Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

ASA this Fall

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-19-2009, 09:30 AM
  #41  
Line Holder
 
TP199's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: ASA FO
Posts: 50
Default

im gonna have to agree with gtech. yes brad did a good job turning the company around. but, like gtech said, we've furloughed for the first time, our schedules and quality of life are worse now than in the LePrick days, we're shrinking, and wasnt last quarter the first time we have lost money in a while. im not saying all these things are brad's fault by any means but it does raise the question of why almost every asa pilot thinks brad is a savior.
TP199 is offline  
Old 06-19-2009, 09:40 AM
  #42  
Line Holder
 
TP199's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: ASA FO
Posts: 50
Default

Originally Posted by John Pennekamp
Ok, mr smart guy, instead of shooting down mine, let's hear your prediction. We'll see who's closer in 6 mos.
alright. in my infinite wisdom i predict that there will be no more furloughs in 2009. they will wait until they realize that mesa is NOT going completely out of business (yes their delta future does not look good, but i dont think any other dci will gain because of it) thus ending their 'plan' for the 20 200's. i would expect more furloughs after that. not sure how many. i really hope im wrong and i hope they do have a plan.

et tois?
TP199 is offline  
Old 06-19-2009, 10:30 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Trip7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,659
Default

Originally Posted by FlyASA
They don't run a social welfare program so they have to have the best interests of the company first. That said they do seem to genuinely care about the employees and their well being.
Well said. Running a business with the well being of your employees being your first priority will run you quickly out of business. Especially in this industry. If you want to work for a company where the company looks after your well being first there's only one way to do it.....start your own business
Trip7 is offline  
Old 06-19-2009, 12:06 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FlyASA's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: CRJ-200 First Officer
Posts: 262
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
Well said. Running a business with the well being of your employees being your first priority will run you quickly out of business. Especially in this industry. If you want to work for a company where the company looks after your well being first there's only one way to do it.....start your own business
If you had a big enough pile of money to start an airline you'd be better off torching it and enjoying the bonfire.......the entertainment alone would give you a much better ROI then actually running an airline
FlyASA is offline  
Old 06-19-2009, 01:28 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atlmsl's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: ATL
Posts: 413
Default

Originally Posted by TP199
im gonna have to agree with gtech. yes brad did a good job turning the company around. but, like gtech said, we've furloughed for the first time, our schedules and quality of life are worse now than in the LePrick days, we're shrinking, and wasnt last quarter the first time we have lost money in a while. im not saying all these things are brad's fault by any means but it does raise the question of why almost every asa pilot thinks brad is a savior.
Southwest lost money too! This is a little different economic period than when Lebreque et al. were in charge. All I said was that I trust our current management to keep ASA successful in the future. No more no less.
atlmsl is offline  
Old 06-19-2009, 03:01 PM
  #46  
Line Holder
 
TP199's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: ASA FO
Posts: 50
Default

Originally Posted by atlmsl
Southwest lost money too! This is a little different economic period than when Lebreque et al. were in charge. All I said was that I trust our current management to keep ASA successful in the future. No more no less.
ya i do understand that things are different today. and i dont even want to know where we'd be today if lebreque was at the helm for the last year and a half.
TP199 is offline  
Old 06-19-2009, 04:56 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atlmsl's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: ATL
Posts: 413
Default

Originally Posted by TP199
ya i do understand that things are different today. and i dont even want to know where we'd be today if lebreque was at the helm for the last year and a half.
That's a scary thought
atlmsl is offline  
Old 06-19-2009, 08:12 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
broncoflyer8912's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: ATR 72 FO
Posts: 140
Default

Originally Posted by FlyASA
If you had a big enough pile of money to start an airline you'd be better off torching it and enjoying the bonfire.......the entertainment alone would give you a much better ROI then actually running an airline
Or you could start Pet Airways!! LOL

Did anyone else see that in the USA Today Money section?!?!
broncoflyer8912 is offline  
Old 06-20-2009, 05:06 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
John Pennekamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Captain, CRJ-200, ASA
Posts: 876
Default

Originally Posted by TP199
alright. in my infinite wisdom i predict that there will be no more furloughs in 2009. they will wait until they realize that mesa is NOT going completely out of business (yes their delta future does not look good, but i dont think any other dci will gain because of it) thus ending their 'plan' for the 20 200's. i would expect more furloughs after that. not sure how many. i really hope im wrong and i hope they do have a plan.

et tois?
United IS dumping Mesa this fall. RFPs have already gone out for their flying.

The maximum number that can be furloughed is 60 before they hit the no furlough clause. You don't know what you don't know.
John Pennekamp is offline  
Old 06-20-2009, 07:01 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FlyASA's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: CRJ-200 First Officer
Posts: 262
Default

Originally Posted by broncoflyer8912
Or you could start Pet Airways!! LOL

Did anyone else see that in the USA Today Money section?!?!
Yeah I know, it's outrageous that people will spend that much to fly their stupid dog somewhere but they balk at paying more than $49 to fly themselves to the same place. Same with FedEx and UPS, individuals will pay a ton of money to overnight a package but refuse to pay a reasonable fare to overnight themselves. Maybe we should start charging people by the pound too?
FlyASA is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mregan
Regional
31
05-06-2009 06:31 AM
FlyASA
Regional
8
03-08-2009 10:31 AM
SpyGlass
Regional
35
02-02-2009 07:17 PM
jungle
Money Talk
7
01-25-2009 07:02 AM
Banshee365
Regional
126
11-09-2008 08:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices