ASA this Fall
#21
Does anyone know what kind of attrition numbers we are looking at for the new publication of the seniority list in July? I'm guessing 0-5 but I have no idea.
Also how many of the 80 ended up going to G7? I can think of 4. I thought all of them were supposed to resign when they went there.
Also how many of the 80 ended up going to G7? I can think of 4. I thought all of them were supposed to resign when they went there.
#22
Q1 2011 recall seems realistic.
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: crj-200 FO
Posts: 479
John where would these other 700/900's come from on another 2-1 deal? DCI has already MAXED out their larger AC's for connection flights.
#24
Q1 2011 seems realistic to me for the following reasons:
- Scott said not to expect any changes till summer 2010 in that email about block hours. If they can make it through this summer with the record number of block hours with out recalls there is no reason why they can't do it next summer, especially with 20 CRJs (net negative 10 aircraft) leaving the fleet.
- PBS could slash our staffing needs by 10% or more if it is voted in
- If the rumors of another 2-1 swap are true (don't know) we'll have a net loss of 20 aircraft (when added with the other 2-1 swap) and at roughly 5.5 crews per aircraft, that's over 220 pilots we won't need anymore.
There is also the Skywest wild card, what's to stop them from taking more ASA flying to avoid furloughs on their side?
#25
Do you really expect them to share their business plan with you before its implemented? That would be unprecedented in this industry. Why tip your hand to your competitors.
Regarding Mesa, they're done for Delta either way. Delta has made it clear that they want rid of them. As for the company as a whole, they're probably done come fall. Their capitalization is so low, they're about to lose their certificate. They're coasting through the summer on high interest short term credit. Look for the biggest implosion since Enron sometime late this fall. That will create a huge vacuum to fill and ASA is best positioned to fill it.
Regarding Mesa, they're done for Delta either way. Delta has made it clear that they want rid of them. As for the company as a whole, they're probably done come fall. Their capitalization is so low, they're about to lose their certificate. They're coasting through the summer on high interest short term credit. Look for the biggest implosion since Enron sometime late this fall. That will create a huge vacuum to fill and ASA is best positioned to fill it.
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: crj-200 FO
Posts: 479
What is the current attrition rate? I would guess it's near 0.
Q1 2011 seems realistic to me for the following reasons:
- Scott said not to expect any changes till summer 2010 in that email about block hours. If they can make it through this summer with the record number of block hours with out recalls there is no reason why they can't do it next summer, especially with 20 CRJs (net negative 10 aircraft) leaving the fleet.
- PBS could slash our staffing needs by 10% or more if it is voted in
- If the rumors of another 2-1 swap are true (don't know) we'll have a net loss of 20 aircraft (when added with the other 2-1 swap) and at roughly 5.5 crews per aircraft, that's over 220 pilots we won't need anymore.
There is also the Skywest wild card, what's to stop them from taking more ASA flying to avoid furloughs on their side?
Q1 2011 seems realistic to me for the following reasons:
- Scott said not to expect any changes till summer 2010 in that email about block hours. If they can make it through this summer with the record number of block hours with out recalls there is no reason why they can't do it next summer, especially with 20 CRJs (net negative 10 aircraft) leaving the fleet.
- PBS could slash our staffing needs by 10% or more if it is voted in
- If the rumors of another 2-1 swap are true (don't know) we'll have a net loss of 20 aircraft (when added with the other 2-1 swap) and at roughly 5.5 crews per aircraft, that's over 220 pilots we won't need anymore.
There is also the Skywest wild card, what's to stop them from taking more ASA flying to avoid furloughs on their side?
#27
I'd be willing to bet they have a plan. Why would a company that was previuosly refusing a 2 for 1 deal agree to a 2 for 1 deal if they didn't have some sort of plan? Skywest INC. isn't a bunch of idiots. Nothing is signed and dotted yet so there is no announcement of anything. JP is right. Why would they talk about something that is not complete? That would just be stupid. Our new management has made good moves so far, let's give them the benefit of the doubt for the time being.
#28
I'd be willing to bet they have a plan. Why would a company that was previuosly refusing a 2 for 1 deal agree to a 2 for 1 deal if they didn't have some sort of plan? Skywest INC. isn't a bunch of idiots. Nothing is signed and dotted yet so there is no announcement of anything. JP is right. Why would they talk about something that is not complete? That would just be stupid. Our new management has made good moves so far, let's give them the benefit of the doubt for the time being.
Bottom line, yes they have a plan but it doesn't mean that plan is good for the pilots.
#29
I'm sure they are making a good move regardless because, from a management perspective, increasing the size of the 700/900 fleet reduces the company's exposure to 50 seaters. They'll diversify the company while the Delta scope still allows them to do so. I'm sure they would love to find homes for all the -200s but given the current financial climate and terrible economics of the aircraft it is doubtful that they will.
Bottom line, yes they have a plan but it doesn't mean that plan is good for the pilots.
Bottom line, yes they have a plan but it doesn't mean that plan is good for the pilots.
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 326
Sorry, no personal attack here, but I hear that line often enough that I have to point out the obvious.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post