Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
FAA Chief to Draft Tougher Rules to Alleviate >

FAA Chief to Draft Tougher Rules to Alleviate

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

FAA Chief to Draft Tougher Rules to Alleviate

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-15-2009, 07:07 PM
  #11  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Default

I dont get it, was fatigue really the issue on 3407?

The only thing we can pray for is to be allowed to fly more than 8hrs in a day, and not be allowed to have duty days longer than 12hrs
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Old 06-15-2009, 07:10 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Left
Posts: 1,809
Default

Originally Posted by aviatorpr
for commuters say goodbye to your cherished days off, this guy is going to have you in domicile 8 hours prior
How can this be enforced? What if I live 1 hours' drive from my base? I drive there 8 hours before my show time, drive home, then leave my house 6 hours later to drive back and fly? If I am "required" to be at work would I be paid?

Also what is the definition of a "commuter"? 2 hours drive? 3? 300 miles? 400 miles?

This seems too complicated to actually happen.
pagey is offline  
Old 06-15-2009, 07:11 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
seafeye's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Hot tub for now
Posts: 1,203
Default

Originally Posted by Rightseat Ballast
That would be a major change in terms of employment, and against the will of the employee at that. NO airline can afford such a bill in today's economy.
The airlines have been getting away with a "C" scale wage for the last 10-15 years. Not our fault they didn't save for the inevitable.
What scares me about this guy is that he is giving up our privacy rights.
What next medical records? Think Southwest has the right to know where you got that itch from?
And there was no mention of the $20k salary that F/O;s make. ***? Poor Wages = reduced safety. Looks like he wants to run for president next election. There is a group of problems not just fatigue. That's just one link in the destruction chain.
seafeye is offline  
Old 06-15-2009, 07:54 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 520
Default

some thoughts:

1. what happened to ONE LEVEL OF SAFETY-- why is the talk of regional airlines only getting a 12 hour duty day- it shoudl be the same for all
2. the above rule will make airlines ****ed off and moaning and groaning and of course they would want to be able to fly more than 8hrs in a duty period to cx the pilots required for the 12 hr future duty rule- so manpower evens out-- IE manpower neutral.

3. did you know that the NTSB has made over 450 recommendations that the FAA has yet to propose and have only implemented about 12 items-- pretty freaking sad if you ask me--- pilots flying on these antiquated rules, the FAA is at as much fault as most of the pilots for not makeing things happen sooner.

4. i seriously doubt things will change--- they havent for almost 60 years and i doubt they will start soon.

5. personally, i think they should adopt the european rules-- they must be doing something right over there- they are living the dream.

6. anti trust immunity, outsourcing flying at the major airline level, downsizing, the huge gap b/w 70 seaters and the smallest mainline aircraft-- things are only going to get more interesting.

SKIPPY-- no tholding my breath
skippy is offline  
Old 06-15-2009, 08:16 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default Test case?

Wonder if Babbitt commuted when he was flying? This may be a good test of whether a line pilot's perspective will make any difference at the FAA.
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 06-15-2009, 08:20 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bryris's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Position: Hotel
Posts: 714
Default

Originally Posted by skippy
personally, i think they should adopt the european rules-- they must be doing something right over there- they are living the dream.
You ever seen the stack of books that are required reading for the JAA license? Its called "weed out". The standards need to be raised across the board to something high. This isn't to play the experience card exclusively, but to weed out half the competition. Less pilots available for jobs equals higher wages and QOL and bargaining power.
bryris is offline  
Old 06-15-2009, 08:20 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bryris's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Position: Hotel
Posts: 714
Default

Originally Posted by tomgoodman
Wonder if Babbitt commuted when he was flying? This may be a good test of whether a line pilot's perspective will make any difference at the FAA.
Said he did for 5 years.
bryris is offline  
Old 06-15-2009, 08:28 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MatthewAMEL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 752
Default

Originally Posted by DryMotorBoatin
I've heard that the new fatigue regulation are going to be nothing more than reduced prices on Red Bull.
Now that was FUNNY!
MatthewAMEL is offline  
Old 06-15-2009, 09:14 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SrfNFly227's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: PIC Challenger 605
Posts: 454
Default

Originally Posted by Rightseat Ballast
And good luck getting a restriction on commuting instituted. To do so would mean our employers would be forced to may moving expenses to every commuting pilot who was hired when commuting was legal and unrestricted.
Why do you think the company would pay the moving expenses??? There are lots of jobs out there, both in and out of aviation, that do not pay for new employees to move. And since Pinnacle gave us moving days, I assume that the other carriers do also. It is not the fault of the airline that people did not actually move during that time.

Of course, for any future moves, caused by displacement or base closures for example, I would definitely agree that the company should pay to move you.
SrfNFly227 is offline  
Old 06-15-2009, 09:35 PM
  #20  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,107
Default

There is no possible legal way to ban commuting. It's too hard to legally define...

If they require all pilots to be in domicile 8 hours prior, then that is duty and you get paid for it (and it counts against your other duty limits).

If they actually banned commuting, they would lose 30% of the pilot force...this career is not worth dragging your family all over the map for, may as well go back on active duty.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rascal
Major
20
01-10-2009 11:50 AM
EWRflyr
Major
2
01-09-2009 03:12 PM
MD11HOG
Cargo
0
01-05-2009 10:27 PM
forgot to bid
Major
15
11-25-2008 09:21 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices