Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

The sad truth

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-2009, 11:23 AM
  #21  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by Counselor
I don't know about that. I would bet that any growth in the U.S. airline industry comes at the regional level, as regionals swallow more and more of the domestic system.

I think we've seen enough of this. Many have seen enough of their jobs disappear to cheaper regionals, & are ready to put a stop to it.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 06-16-2009, 12:17 PM
  #22  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 97
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
I think we've seen enough of this. Many have seen enough of their jobs disappear to cheaper regionals, & are ready to put a stop to it.
I'm with you. I'm just pessimistic about a labor component's ability to reverse undeniable market and economic forces.
Counselor is offline  
Old 06-16-2009, 12:23 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Former XJ, Corporate HS-125
Posts: 153
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
I think we've seen enough of this. Many have seen enough of their jobs disappear to cheaper regionals, & are ready to put a stop to it.
Because people sitting in the seat next to them gave up scope to regionals at some point to save their own tails. The state of the industry right now has a number of contributing factors...

Nobody's happy about it. Hopefully those that have been put out at the major level by their own counterparts come to their senses. While jumpseating on a mainline flight the crew I got talking. The captain, a fairly senior gent, stated how he would never fly an RJ no matter how big it is. The FO was on the other end of the spectrum, saying how he can't believe that regionals have anything more than 50 seat aircraft.

Regionals are no longer "regionals". Much of North America can be reached by an RJ from a domestic hub now-a-days. I sit right sit in CRJ-900 that has replaced a number of old mainline routes. Why? Old school pilots didn't want the flying when it was on their plate. Now we're all getting the shaft.

I for one would love to see mainline pilots re-claim regional flying. A lot of folks with have to swallow their pride and put their ego aside for this to happen. CRJ7/900s, EMB170(190 NOW!?!) do not belong at regionals. It will only better the future of the industry for both regional and mainline pilots to return the flying to where it belongs.

I realize this is a ramble of a post, excuse the grammar and think about the points
spank is offline  
Old 06-16-2009, 12:52 PM
  #24  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by spank
Because people sitting in the seat next to them gave up scope to regionals at some point to save their own tails. The state of the industry right now has a number of contributing factors...

Nobody's happy about it. Hopefully those that have been put out at the major level by their own counterparts come to their senses. While jumpseating on a mainline flight the crew I got talking. The captain, a fairly senior gent, stated how he would never fly an RJ no matter how big it is. The FO was on the other end of the spectrum, saying how he can't believe that regionals have anything more than 50 seat aircraft.

Regionals are no longer "regionals". Much of North America can be reached by an RJ from a domestic hub now-a-days. I sit right sit in CRJ-900 that has replaced a number of old mainline routes. Why? Old school pilots didn't want the flying when it was on their plate. Now we're all getting the shaft.

I for one would love to see mainline pilots re-claim regional flying. A lot of folks with have to swallow their pride and put their ego aside for this to happen. CRJ7/900s, EMB170(190 NOW!?!) do not belong at regionals. It will only better the future of the industry for both regional and mainline pilots to return the flying to where it belongs.

I realize this is a ramble of a post, excuse the grammar and think about the points
I'm not disagreeing with you. I'm also not denying that there are Mainline pilots that have the I'll never fly an RJ mentality. I for one don't think the CRJ900 is an RJ. I think of it as a DC9 with a smaller cabin. I want it at Mainline, just like the E170/190.

Last edited by johnso29; 06-16-2009 at 02:11 PM.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 06-16-2009, 02:04 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Maddog FO
Posts: 653
Default

It should say Chautauqua/Midwest
Roper92 is offline  
Old 06-16-2009, 02:19 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Reclined
Posts: 2,168
Default

Originally Posted by UpThere
Don't jump to conclusions. AWAC is one of the lower in crew costs because they have an all 50 seat fleet. But if you look at their pay and contract, you will see they are one of the leaders.

Wow, somebody drinks the koolaid
Mason32 is offline  
Old 06-16-2009, 02:51 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 284
Default

Originally Posted by TP199
this is not good news for asa. dont we have until next year to be the second lowest cost carrier. we're not even close.

This figure is just pilot cost and doesn't account for all the other costs involved. ASA has been working on there cost for some time now and i'm sure they have significantly reduced them from what they were. Skywest would be the same if they had as many lifers as ASA does.
flyingkangaroo is offline  
Old 06-16-2009, 02:55 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BigBallzMagee's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: CRJ Flap Operator
Posts: 103
Default

RAISE TICKET PRICES!!!!!!!! End of story. The public just like a gas hike will still pay it......Only way to save us all.
BigBallzMagee is offline  
Old 06-16-2009, 03:11 PM
  #29  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Here, there and now here again
Posts: 50
Smile

Truer words were never spoken, Magee. Well typed anyway.
ndarmour is offline  
Old 06-16-2009, 03:15 PM
  #30  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by Counselor
I don't know about that. I would bet that any growth in the U.S. airline industry comes at the regional level, as regionals swallow more and more of the domestic system.
That would be the correct assessment.

Overall, the domestic market will contract just as the International market is also doing. I would expect the regional level to grow fairly modestly while the domestic mainline level to shrink substantially.

The overwhelming remainder of the 50-seat or less RJ's will eventually be replaced by single class 70-seaters or 85 seat aircraft configured to perhaps 75-80 in mixed class. That will be the growth/replacement of the domestic market over the next 5-7 years. Wheras the tired old 737-300's and S-80's will be retired. The smallest aircraft for mailine fleets will be the 737-800 or A-320 which is up around 145 seats.

That's where we are at, that's where we are going and unfortunately nothing can stop that. Over the next few years there will be some labor heartburn over this, but ultimately the reality that is already here will be realized.
eaglefly is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SVA402
Major
316
06-14-2009 09:01 PM
BringDaFunk
In Memory Of
39
01-13-2009 02:28 PM
LastTraintoMEM
Leaving the Career
10
01-13-2009 06:10 AM
alfaromeo
Mergers and Acquisitions
116
10-30-2008 03:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices