Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
SkyWest Ends its Midwest Agreement >

SkyWest Ends its Midwest Agreement

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

SkyWest Ends its Midwest Agreement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-2009, 06:44 PM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Beechlover's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: E-190/175/170
Posts: 172
Default

Originally Posted by SpiraMirabilis
RAH is replacing them with 135s? That sure makes a lot of economical sense... NOT.

WE ARE RAH..., YOU WILL BE ASSIMILATED.., RESISTANCE IS FUTILE..., YOU WILL SERVICE.......,US! MUWAHAHAH! Simmah dahn nah.
Beechlover is offline  
Old 06-09-2009, 07:51 PM
  #82  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

Originally Posted by Convairator
Best damn band in the land too.
Behind Texas A&M. I've seen them both in person and A&M rocks every school out there.


YouTube - Fightin' Texas Aggie Band
ToiletDuck is offline  
Old 06-09-2009, 08:00 PM
  #83  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

YouTube - Fightin' Texas Aggie Band Full Halftime Performance Vs. Neb. great intro
ToiletDuck is offline  
Old 06-09-2009, 08:02 PM
  #84  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by IFlyForFood
Huh? You know something we don't or are you being sarcastic?? Getting paid for cancelled flights......right, when h*ll freezes over, dude.

I think he was implying that your contract has much room for improvement. Many Regional pilot contracts pay for CXD flights.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 06-09-2009, 08:22 PM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,814
Default

Originally Posted by JetJock16
On a side note; it's sad that if Mgmnt & SAPA came to our pilot group and said that if we voted yes for Q pay at EMB rates plus 5% we'd get 40 new airframes; they'd get a 65% approval vote. Most would say let's get them on property and then we'll get paid and the others just care about the movement (Upgrades, transitions, etc).

It will be a dark day if we start operating Q's for those rates.
Just a slight thread-drift on my end as well...that is the reasoning GoJet Pilots use to sleep at night; that Trans States should have done anything to get the planes on property first, and that ALPA mislead them all the way...

But I'm with you...a fair wage or nothing at all.
ExperimentalAB is offline  
Old 06-09-2009, 08:50 PM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Originally Posted by JetJock16
On a side note; it's sad that if Mgmnt & SAPA came to our pilot group and said that if we voted yes for Q pay at EMB rates plus 5% we'd get 40 new airframes; they'd get a 65% approval vote. Most would say let's get them on property and then we'll get paid and the others just care about the movement (Upgrades, transitions, etc).
You mean like when UAL was in BK and the 70/90 seat for 50 seat rate and the 18 month pay freeze that lasted TWICE that was agreed too?

NO, I'm not flaming you, but that sounds pretty familiar to what happened back in the 2003-2004 time frame. Not sure if you where there for it or not. But that didn't exactly do good things for the other UAX carriers at the time.
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 06-09-2009, 08:56 PM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JetJock16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SkyWest Capt.
Posts: 2,963
Default

Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB
Just a slight thread-drift on my end as well...that is the reasoning GoJet Pilots use to sleep at night; that Trans States should have done anything to get the planes on property first, and that ALPA mislead them all the way...

But I'm with you...a fair wage or nothing at all.
This is fine as long as it's a fair first rate, EMB + 5% is a slap in the face.
JetJock16 is offline  
Old 06-09-2009, 09:06 PM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 2,035
Cool

Originally Posted by JetJock16
This is fine as long as it's a fair first rate, EMB + 5% is a slap in the face.





Anything less than Horizon's rate is a slap in the face... Up to 78 pax with a cruising speed that allows block times for 300 NM segments within a few minutes of RJ block times!
Paid2fly is offline  
Old 06-09-2009, 09:10 PM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Originally Posted by Paid2fly
Anything less than Horizon's rate is a slap in the face... Up to 78 pax with a cruising speed that allows block times for 300 NM segments within a few minutes of RJ block times!
20 to 40 MORE seats for the same rate was a slap in the face.
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 06-09-2009, 09:17 PM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,814
Default

Originally Posted by JetJock16
This is fine as long as it's a fair first rate, EMB + 5% is a slap in the face.
Yes...

Originally Posted by Paid2fly
Anything less than Horizon's rate is a slap in the face... Up to 78 pax with a cruising speed that allows block times for 300 NM segments within a few minutes of RJ block times!
Yes...

Originally Posted by dojetdriver
20 to 40 MORE seats for the same rate was a slap in the face.
And amen!
ExperimentalAB is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SVA402
Major
316
06-14-2009 09:01 PM
dimondan
Regional
2
03-19-2009 10:08 AM
ToiletDuck
Major
22
03-12-2009 12:01 PM
Hal9000
Regional
111
01-22-2009 08:24 PM
BoilerUP
Regional
110
09-06-2008 08:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices