Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Back to the good old days... >

Back to the good old days...

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Back to the good old days...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-28-2009, 08:08 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 346
Default Back to the good old days...

Lately there has been much conversation about Pilot qualifications and experience in today's Airline flight decks. There has also been much conversation about pilot pay and QOL.

Being a pilot used to be a glamorous career, which has changed drastically to what we have now in the industry.

So what can we do to make this industry better? Better pay and more experienced pilots?

We need to stop discussing all the problems of the industry and figure out a way to make it better for current and future pilots.
FlyingPirate is offline  
Old 05-28-2009, 08:17 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: Right...CL65
Posts: 279
Default

Regulate the airlines again...
xtreme is offline  
Old 05-28-2009, 08:57 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Killer51883's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: E-170
Posts: 842
Default

instead of bean counters running things how about honest managers who worked from the bottom up and actually understand the fact that it costs money to make money
Killer51883 is offline  
Old 05-28-2009, 09:25 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 155
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingPirate
So what can we do to make this industry better? Better pay and more experienced pilots?
Increase the experience requirement for 121 carriers. No more 250 hour pilots.

I think 1500 hours should be the absolute minimum.
rustypigeon is offline  
Old 05-28-2009, 09:34 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,530
Default

Originally Posted by xtreme
Regulate the airlines again...
There's a reason gov got out a long time ago. No one wants to touch this industry, it's doomed. You can't make any money from selling a one dollar product for a dime. I'm surprised more airlines haven't gone under.
Purpleanga is offline  
Old 05-28-2009, 09:53 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Luv2Rotate's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,498
Default

Originally Posted by rustypigeon
Increase the experience requirement for 121 carriers. No more 250 hour pilots.

I think 1500 hours should be the absolute minimum.
I totally agree... ATP mins should be standard for hiring mins
Luv2Rotate is offline  
Old 05-28-2009, 10:29 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
exwaterski's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 328
Default

Things will never go back to the good old days. All of this negative press is simply a PR problem for the airlines as soon as the heat dies down and the press finds another ambulance to chase it will be back to business as usual.

UNLESS... the government steps in and forces change. But you can bet there would be a big pushback from the ATA, RAA, etc.
exwaterski is offline  
Old 05-29-2009, 07:33 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
wags3539's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Slinger
Posts: 316
Default

Originally Posted by rustypigeon
Increase the experience requirement for 121 carriers. No more 250 hour pilots.

I think 1500 hours should be the absolute minimum.
All this talk about raising the mins to fly for an airline. Increased hours doesn't necessarily make better pilots, quality flight training makes better pilots. While going through training they even tell you the most dangerous time in your career is when you aquire about 800-1000 hours in the A/C and complacency starts to set in. I feel for the captains who constantly baby sit the person sitting in the right seat, but that could have absolutely nothing to do with the amount of time they have. If they got through the airline's training program and they are still a burden on the captain, then that's not showing a lack of experience on their part, that's showing a lack of judgement on the training department. That is the point of IOE, obviously no matter how much time you have, there is going to be a transition period when switching aircraft. If the IOE captain signs them off, in my mind that should be good enough, and the amount of hours they had prior to that should have nothing to do with it.
wags3539 is offline  
Old 05-29-2009, 07:39 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Poprocket's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: MD88 CA
Posts: 116
Default

Originally Posted by exwaterski
Things will never go back to the good old days. All of this negative press is simply a PR problem for the airlines as soon as the heat dies down and the press finds another ambulance to chase it will be back to business as usual.

UNLESS... the government steps in and forces change. But you can bet there would be a big pushback from the ATA, RAA, etc.

"Change we can believe in!" - WHATEVER.
Poprocket is offline  
Old 05-29-2009, 07:44 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: CA
Posts: 155
Default

Originally Posted by wags3539
All this talk about raising the mins to fly for an airline. Increased hours doesn't necessarily make better pilots, quality flight training makes better pilots.
Yes quality training makes better pilots, but when it comes to flight hours you have to draw the line somewhere. 250 hours is not where that line should be drawn.

Enough experience is gained in that 250-1500 time frame that I think the line should be drawn at a minimum of 1500.
rustypigeon is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BigToe
Foreign
1603
09-14-2023 08:04 PM
USMCFLYR
Military
5
04-26-2009 11:13 PM
Corkscrew
Cargo
21
01-25-2009 04:04 PM
JungleBus
Major
121
12-20-2008 04:13 PM
steamgauge
Cargo
200
12-18-2008 06:25 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices