Even if they pay RAH pilots more...?
#11
On another note why would you be against RAH having them for Midwest if they pay more than say US Airways? Don't get me wrong I want them gone but I'm wondering what your rational is behind it.
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 127
I didn't say anything about RAH outsourcing flying from anyone. Rethink what I just said? Perhaps you should reread it. All I said is that I don't care what aircraft are at RAH so long as they pay for it. You can hold me to that all you'd like. We're talking aircraft not airlines. Midwest is on the verge of going BK and probably won't be around very long. RAH can fly these in Hawaii till their eyes pop out for all I care or basically take over Midwest and keep them flying here so long as they make the pay.
On another note why would you be against RAH having them for Midwest if they pay more than say US Airways? Don't get me wrong I want them gone but I'm wondering what your rational is behind it.
On another note why would you be against RAH having them for Midwest if they pay more than say US Airways? Don't get me wrong I want them gone but I'm wondering what your rational is behind it.
Really? So do you want them gone or do you not care?
#13
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: /A
Posts: 34
So, what is going to happen when RAH mgnt doesn't give you JBLU wages? According to the APC page, 1st year FO for JBLU gets $40/hr and 1st year FO for RAH gets $23/hr regardless of aircraft. Good luck getting the JBLU wages...
#14
I want them gone from Midwest but don't care what aircraft we have so long as we are paid right. If they want to send them to Hawaii then that's perfectly fine by me but it they're going to go mainline then I want mainline wages.
#15
Even if they pay RAH pilots more money to fly the 190, it is still not acceptable for anyone at a regional to be flying a jet that large.
If management at other airlines see they can undercut their mainline pilots with regional pilots and pay the regional pilots more money, and still save money compared to what they were paying their mainline pilots, RAH will not be the first if they get away with it. This is not acceptable at any pay rate. We will end up with regional contracts with regional work rules, flying for slightly more money. Its not worth it people!!! WAKE UP!!!!
If management at other airlines see they can undercut their mainline pilots with regional pilots and pay the regional pilots more money, and still save money compared to what they were paying their mainline pilots, RAH will not be the first if they get away with it. This is not acceptable at any pay rate. We will end up with regional contracts with regional work rules, flying for slightly more money. Its not worth it people!!! WAKE UP!!!!
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: ERJ FO
Posts: 1,276
It's absolutely unacceptable for a regional to fly these aircraft. BUT - I refuse to take the blame because the "major" airline pilot groups could not adequately protect their scope. Everyone forgets that RAH would still be flying turboprops in the Northeast if US, UAL, and DAL didn't relax scope on their contracts. First it was 50 seaters, then 70, then 76, and at US Air it's 86 seats!
What is RAH management supposed to do? Not take advantage of this fact so someone else can? You think SKW, GJ, Mesa, Pinnacle, etc. etc. wouldn't jump at the chance to up the revenues and secure more flying with bigger airplanes? HA! They're not in it to play nice...they're in it to make as much money as they can.
And what is an RAH pilot supposed to do?? Walk off the job because management is angering the rest of the industry?? The best we can do is tighten up the contract, go for more pay, better work rules, etc. etc. We're 1.5 years into that now and if the ASA contract is any indication...it's still another 2.5 years away. Everyone acts like because we got 190's we can just automatically strike with absolutely no repercussions.
But it all comes back to scope. ALPA gave away everyones jobs back in the 90's when it started relaxing scope for RJ's. It has only gotten much much worse. You want to put a stop to the bleeding? Get stronger scope language. Period. RAH took major concessions on pay and work rules to put an iron clad scope clause in our contract. But calling me a scab because I should up to work one day and we had -190's on property is a friggin' joke.
What is RAH management supposed to do? Not take advantage of this fact so someone else can? You think SKW, GJ, Mesa, Pinnacle, etc. etc. wouldn't jump at the chance to up the revenues and secure more flying with bigger airplanes? HA! They're not in it to play nice...they're in it to make as much money as they can.
And what is an RAH pilot supposed to do?? Walk off the job because management is angering the rest of the industry?? The best we can do is tighten up the contract, go for more pay, better work rules, etc. etc. We're 1.5 years into that now and if the ASA contract is any indication...it's still another 2.5 years away. Everyone acts like because we got 190's we can just automatically strike with absolutely no repercussions.
But it all comes back to scope. ALPA gave away everyones jobs back in the 90's when it started relaxing scope for RJ's. It has only gotten much much worse. You want to put a stop to the bleeding? Get stronger scope language. Period. RAH took major concessions on pay and work rules to put an iron clad scope clause in our contract. But calling me a scab because I should up to work one day and we had -190's on property is a friggin' joke.
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,530
Even if they pay RAH pilots more money to fly the 190, it is still not acceptable for anyone at a regional to be flying a jet that large.
If management at other airlines see they can undercut their mainline pilots with regional pilots and pay the regional pilots more money, and still save money compared to what they were paying their mainline pilots, RAH will not be the first if they get away with it. This is not acceptable at any pay rate. We will end up with regional contracts with regional work rules, flying for slightly more money. Its not worth it people!!! WAKE UP!!!!
If management at other airlines see they can undercut their mainline pilots with regional pilots and pay the regional pilots more money, and still save money compared to what they were paying their mainline pilots, RAH will not be the first if they get away with it. This is not acceptable at any pay rate. We will end up with regional contracts with regional work rules, flying for slightly more money. Its not worth it people!!! WAKE UP!!!!
#19
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
I couldn't disagree with you more. Should RAH pay mainline wages, ie match JBLU, there's absolutely no reason these aircraft can't stay where they are. Southwest got started the same way. The company could fly 757s all over the country if they want they had just better pay for it. I'm talking matched pay with those who have the aircraft, B plans, etc.
TD,
While I agree getting better rates then JB would make this an easier pill to swallow, pay is not the only issue. Most guys who work at the regional level don't understand the huge increase in QOL that comes with moving on to a Legacy. There are many other things that need to be addressed. Also, I think B.B. is hoping to use these at Midwest until it goes under, and then shift them to Hawaii for an independent operation.
#20
Line Holder
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: CRJ-700 Captain
Posts: 53
Have you lost your mind?! Is RAH doing self branding flying? Or are they simply replacing the job of perfectly capable pilots at Midwest that are now on the street!
You better rethink what you just said. Im going to hold you to saying that you think it is ok for Republic to outsource 757 flying to replace other major airlines. Unbelievable.
You better rethink what you just said. Im going to hold you to saying that you think it is ok for Republic to outsource 757 flying to replace other major airlines. Unbelievable.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
38
12-05-2012 09:29 AM