Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Routes the CRJ and EMB135/145 should not fly >

Routes the CRJ and EMB135/145 should not fly

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Routes the CRJ and EMB135/145 should not fly

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-06-2009, 11:49 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 456
Default

Originally Posted by Roper92
The RJ was made for routes like EWR-TUL, EWR-XNA, IAH-TUS, IAH-PSP, IAH-CME, IAH-RIC/ORF/GSP/SAV/AVL..you get the point.

It's not about the distance, it's about the size of cities you are flying to. Flying an EMB-145 from IAH-ORD and DFW does not make sense. Why? ORD and DFW are major airports in large metropolitan areas. However, a 737 would never fill to RIC, ORF, GSP. The distance is too far for a turboprop. That, in my opinion, is the niche market for the RJ----> A semi-long flight (1.5-2.5 hours) to a city with capacity too small for a 737/A320. These ridiculous IAH-BPT/CLL/CRP could go either way between a turboprop or RJ. I prefer to ride on an RJ as a passenger and prefer to fly one as a pilot
More airlines should get the Q400...
Dan64456 is offline  
Old 05-06-2009, 12:37 PM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheDashRocks's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: DHC-8 CA Furloughed
Posts: 305
Default

Originally Posted by Roper92
I prefer to ride on an RJ as a passenger and prefer to fly one as a pilot
I prefer to fly the DHC8 when I have to circle to RWY 33 at ASE or RWY 27 at TEX.
TheDashRocks is offline  
Old 05-06-2009, 12:50 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: rear GV
Posts: 294
Default

Originally Posted by RAHPilot5
We had those legs in the 170s before delta decided not to have us do them anymore. I guess they passed them along to yall. Lucky bastards!

Nothing like a 3 or 4-day trip doing a AUS or DFW overnight(22 hours+). Wake up and fly aus-jfk back to aus or dfw just under 8 hours of block with a 22+ hour overnight. I loved those trips. My longest was JFK-AUS 6 hr 45 mins. with a 2 hour sit in JFK due to taxiing behind the intl departures after 5:00pm. I know of 1 captain who blocked over 8 hours JFK-AUS due to weather at JFK plus taxiing behind all the int. departures.

However, we never stopped enroute for fuel.

Of course it was the 170 so it was comftorable too. I think their is a youtube clip about us when the JFK delays were really bad couple years ago.

I wish we had those JFK-AUS/DFW legs though. I had a lot of days off with those trips.

Enjoy em!

I bet you dont like those legs so much when they CANCEL and you dont get paid. But its a 170 and its comfortable, i'd fly that thing for free!!!
DLAJ77 is offline  
Old 05-06-2009, 09:53 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
avi8tor4life's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 378
Default

Originally Posted by Dan64456
More airlines should get the Q400...
I agree that on some flights they would be better off than an RJ. But what about pay? Pilots flying the Q get paid crap to fly more passengers around than what an RJ driver gets and that is crap as well.
avi8tor4life is offline  
Old 05-06-2009, 10:00 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TPROP4ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: none ya...
Posts: 1,154
Default

Originally Posted by DLAJ77
I bet you dont like those legs so much when they CANCEL and you dont get paid. But its a 170 and its comfortable, i'd fly that thing for free!!!

Oh poop here we go in 3...2...1
TPROP4ever is offline  
Old 05-06-2009, 10:56 PM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atpwannabe's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Student Pilot
Posts: 2,277
Default

Originally Posted by STINKY
I have flown DAY-CVG

In a CRJ in 12:37 the record lol.

I've flown that route as well, but as a passenger (Comair employee) back in '98. Never could understand why they used an RJ when the Bro's seemed more practical.



atp
atpwannabe is offline  
Old 05-07-2009, 03:46 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: EMB135BJ SIC
Posts: 205
Default

Short hops: CLE-CMH, EWR-PVD
Long ones have been mentioned for xjt. IAH-BFL (no more), IAH-ONT/PSP, IAH-PIT, EWR-CYYT.

Shortest i've done in a jet was MMU-TEB...... a whopping 16nm.
U-I pilot is offline  
Old 05-07-2009, 06:12 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Avroman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: FIRE ALPA
Posts: 3,097
Default

Originally Posted by U-I pilot
Short hops: CLE-CMH, EWR-PVD
Long ones have been mentioned for xjt. IAH-BFL (no more), IAH-ONT/PSP, IAH-PIT, EWR-CYYT.

Shortest i've done in a jet was MMU-TEB...... a whopping 16nm.
Got ya beat I did DTW to YIP in a CE-550, all of about 6 miles.
Avroman is offline  
Old 05-07-2009, 07:33 PM
  #69  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: fo
Posts: 91
Default

PWK-ORD in a C525 about 3 years ago....thats like 6nm...haha

ORD-PIT...with our loads it should be mainline
ORD-JAX..not sure how the loads are but its kind of a long flight.
MIA-PIT
MIA-CMH..i can see a regional jet on this one since its CMH, however it does seem kinda long in a EMB-140.
Bobs98tlr is offline  
Old 05-08-2009, 05:38 AM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
groovinaviator's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: CL65 Captain
Posts: 484
Default

I did BEC-AAO in a Beechjet on several occasions... 3 miles between airport centers and the runways were both 18-36 with only 1/4 mile sidestep. Usually we went straight in... never even sucked the gear up

At AWAC some short ones are...

CLT-GSP
CLT-GSO
PHL-AVP
ERI-PIT (although i think that one is a thing of the past)
PHL- Allentown
PHL-MDT

We even used to do CLT-PHF-ORF... the PHF-ORF leg was blocked at 5 minutes.

Last edited by groovinaviator; 05-08-2009 at 09:27 AM.
groovinaviator is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices