Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Routes the CRJ and EMB135/145 should not fly >

Routes the CRJ and EMB135/145 should not fly

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Routes the CRJ and EMB135/145 should not fly

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-04-2009, 08:20 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 122
Default

Originally Posted by JetBlast77
XJT does a ridiculous amount of flights that shouldn't be an RJ:

EWR-OKC, EWR-TUL, EWR-NAS, EWR-MCI, EWR-LIT, EWR-XNA, EWR-STL, EWR-MSY, CLE-NAS, CLE-MIA, CLE-PBI, CLE-MCO, CLE-TPA, IAH-NAS, IAH-PIT, IAH-SLC, IAH-ABQ, IAH-PHX, IAH-TUS, IAH-YYZ, IAH-BOI (now removed), IAH-PSP, IAH-MEX, IAH-PVR, IAH-SJD, IAH-ACA, IAH-HUX, IAH-CME, IAH-RIC, IAH-DCA, IAH-ORD, IAH-MCO, IAH-RSW.....They even used to do IAH-GUA. Am I forgetting any? Its always funny when I talk to mainline guys and they tell me how sweet the schedules and overnights will get once we're at a major and get away from these "regional" schedules. You tell me whats regional about a 25 hour commutable 4 day with overnights in Boston, Cabo, and PHX. Boston the hotel is right downtown next to everything, Cabo is an all inclusive resort in the beach, and PHX is also downtown close to a lot. Yeah, these "regional" schedules are for the birds...

Mmmmm...beans and swine flu. PHX toilets beware.

I remember doing LA-Veracruz turns during the DC days 2 summers ago. Routinely over 8 hours...FAA wasn't too happy about that.
Washout is offline  
Old 05-04-2009, 08:44 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ERJ135's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: CR7 Capt
Posts: 1,621
Default

LGA XNA in the ERJ135.... If we needed to alt's we'd have to stop in BNA for fuel.
ERJ135 is offline  
Old 05-04-2009, 08:55 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ebl14's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 73N
Posts: 862
Default

Originally Posted by freezingflyboy
I know people always give us XJT guys grief for it (as if it's OUR choice) but I am doing IAH-YYZ tommorow. Seems like that should be a mainline route just based on the distance and the fact that its the 4th largest US city and largest Canadian city. But Air Canada flies the route (and YUL-IAH, YYC-IAH) with Jazz CRJ-700s and the occasional E170 so there must not be as much demand there as you'd think.
Probably cause Canadians and Texans go together like oil and water.
ebl14 is offline  
Old 05-04-2009, 12:25 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Maddog FO
Posts: 653
Default

Originally Posted by JetBlast77
XJT does a ridiculous amount of flights that shouldn't be an RJ:

EWR-OKC, EWR-TUL, EWR-NAS, EWR-MCI, EWR-LIT, EWR-XNA, EWR-STL, EWR-MSY, CLE-NAS, CLE-MIA, CLE-PBI, CLE-MCO, CLE-TPA, IAH-NAS, IAH-PIT, IAH-SLC, IAH-ABQ, IAH-PHX, IAH-TUS, IAH-YYZ, IAH-BOI (now removed), IAH-PSP, IAH-MEX, IAH-PVR, IAH-SJD, IAH-ACA, IAH-HUX, IAH-CME, IAH-RIC, IAH-DCA, IAH-ORD, IAH-MCO, IAH-RSW.....They even used to do IAH-GUA. Am I forgetting any? Its always funny when I talk to mainline guys and they tell me how sweet the schedules and overnights will get once we're at a major and get away from these "regional" schedules. You tell me whats regional about a 25 hour commutable 4 day with overnights in Boston, Cabo, and PHX. Boston the hotel is right downtown next to everything, Cabo is an all inclusive resort in the beach, and PHX is also downtown close to a lot. Yeah, these "regional" schedules are for the birds...
The RJ was made for routes like EWR-TUL, EWR-XNA, IAH-TUS, IAH-PSP, IAH-CME, IAH-RIC/ORF/GSP/SAV/AVL..you get the point.

It's not about the distance, it's about the size of cities you are flying to. Flying an EMB-145 from IAH-ORD and DFW does not make sense. Why? ORD and DFW are major airports in large metropolitan areas. However, a 737 would never fill to RIC, ORF, GSP. The distance is too far for a turboprop. That, in my opinion, is the niche market for the RJ----> A semi-long flight (1.5-2.5 hours) to a city with capacity too small for a 737/A320. These ridiculous IAH-BPT/CLL/CRP could go either way between a turboprop or RJ. I prefer to ride on an RJ as a passenger and prefer to fly one as a pilot
Roper92 is offline  
Old 05-04-2009, 12:49 PM
  #45  
Line Holder
 
tr disagree's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: Furlough
Posts: 86
Default

Originally Posted by JetBlast77
XJT does a ridiculous amount of flights that shouldn't be an RJ:

EWR-OKC, EWR-TUL, EWR-NAS, EWR-MCI, EWR-LIT, EWR-XNA, EWR-STL, EWR-MSY, CLE-NAS, CLE-MIA, CLE-PBI, CLE-MCO, CLE-TPA, IAH-NAS, IAH-PIT, IAH-SLC, IAH-ABQ, IAH-PHX, IAH-TUS, IAH-YYZ, IAH-BOI (now removed), IAH-PSP, IAH-MEX, IAH-PVR, IAH-SJD, IAH-ACA, IAH-HUX, IAH-CME, IAH-RIC, IAH-DCA, IAH-ORD, IAH-MCO, IAH-RSW.....They even used to do IAH-GUA. Am I forgetting any? Its always funny when I talk to mainline guys and they tell me how sweet the schedules and overnights will get once we're at a major and get away from these "regional" schedules. You tell me whats regional about a 25 hour commutable 4 day with overnights in Boston, Cabo, and PHX. Boston the hotel is right downtown next to everything, Cabo is an all inclusive resort in the beach, and PHX is also downtown close to a lot. Yeah, these "regional" schedules are for the birds...

You forgot IAH-OAX, IAH-MSP, IAH-TUS, EWR-STL
tr disagree is offline  
Old 05-04-2009, 04:22 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CaptKrunch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: LeftSeat PA-44
Posts: 528
Default

Originally Posted by Roper92
The RJ was made for routes like EWR-TUL, EWR-XNA, IAH-TUS, IAH-PSP, IAH-CME, IAH-RIC/ORF/GSP/SAV/AVL..you get the point.

It's not about the distance, it's about the size of cities you are flying to. Flying an EMB-145 from IAH-ORD and DFW does not make sense. Why? ORD and DFW are major airports in large metropolitan areas. However, a 737 would never fill to RIC, ORF, GSP. The distance is too far for a turboprop. That, in my opinion, is the niche market for the RJ----> A semi-long flight (1.5-2.5 hours) to a city with capacity too small for a 737/A320. These ridiculous IAH-BPT/CLL/CRP could go either way between a turboprop or RJ. I prefer to ride on an RJ as a passenger and prefer to fly one as a pilot
Don't waste your breathe people here want a 757 on those routes no matter if it is filled or not.
CaptKrunch is offline  
Old 05-04-2009, 04:29 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 224
Default

Originally Posted by ERJ135
LGA XNA in the ERJ135.... If we needed to alt's we'd have to stop in BNA for fuel.
I stopped in MEM the one time I needed a fuel stop.
be76flyer is offline  
Old 05-04-2009, 05:32 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Avroman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: FIRE ALPA
Posts: 3,097
Default

Originally Posted by CaptKrunch
Don't waste your breathe people here want a 757 on those routes no matter if it is filled or not.
Are you joking... I'd rather be on either an A320 or a B767. The worst plane as a passenger is the 753... Followed closely by the 752.
Avroman is offline  
Old 05-04-2009, 05:46 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CaptKrunch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: LeftSeat PA-44
Posts: 528
Default

Originally Posted by Avroman
Are you joking... I'd rather be on either an A320 or a B767. The worst plane as a passenger is the 753... Followed closely by the 752.
OK then, people here would rather EWR-XNA be done on a 744.
CaptKrunch is offline  
Old 05-04-2009, 05:46 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,814
Default

Originally Posted by Avroman
Are you joking... I'd rather be on either an A320 or a B767. The worst plane as a passenger is the 753... Followed closely by the 752.
I respectfully disagree! It's all opinion, joker
ExperimentalAB is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices