Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

RAH and 190's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2009, 10:03 PM
  #41  
Gets Off
 
Bond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: On Top
Posts: 742
Default

Originally Posted by BarbieTrash
I hope I am wrong as well! Anything more than 66 seats is hazardous to my career progression. It's tough to see Mainline flying chipped away one E-jet at a time...
Amen to that. Nothing would make me happier than Delta integrating Compass, or US airways contractually taking back everything above a 70 seater, or CAL tightening up their scope even more and restricting the number of RJ's and props in the system. We'll see.
Bond is offline  
Old 04-05-2009, 10:08 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Posts: 617
Default

Originally Posted by BarbieTrash
I hope I am wrong as well! Anything more than 66 seats is hazardous to my career progression. It's tough to see Mainline flying chipped away one E-jet at a time...
This proves that folks are just biased towards E-jets. What about big CRJs? Or ATR-72s? or Q400s? Guess none of those are a problem.
SVA402 is offline  
Old 04-05-2009, 10:15 PM
  #43  
Gets Off
 
Bond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: On Top
Posts: 742
Default

Originally Posted by SVA402
This proves that folks are just biased towards E-jets. What about big CRJs? Or ATR-72s? or Q400s? Guess none of those are a problem.
Any prop over 19 seats, or anything with jet engines should be at mainline, how's that? But seeing as they can't take all back at once, they have to start with the biggest. Is the CRJ900 a mainline aircraft? You bet!!! It's a DC9 as far as I'm concerned.
Bond is offline  
Old 04-06-2009, 03:02 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Rightseat Ballast's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: E170/175 CA
Posts: 334
Default

Yes. two RAH certificates have been approved for branded flying. Those approvals are just contingency plans. With Airways and United on ever unstable ground financially, RAH needs a plan for its aircraft should a major partner go away. Independence (ACA branded) came to be only because it lost its contract with United. ExpressJet did branded flying because it lost a significant amount of Continental flying. Neither airline went branded because they thought it was a good idea. They did it because they needed to generate some revenue, even if only enough to prolong the inevitable. RAH would do branded flying under the same circumstances, with the notable exception being Mokulele should RAH choose to assume further control.

RAH management wants 190's, and they are pretty good at getting their way. Labor contracts are merely bumps in the road to them. I have no preference either way at this point. You can tell me that getting 190's at RAH is career suicide, but this is coming from the guys who have watched the mainline job crumble beneath them. Age 65 extended my career at a regional. Mainline weakness in regards to scope has extended my career at a regional. You all make it sound as though I am the one choosing to settle for less and undermine my future, but it has always been the votes of mainline pilots and politicians that have dictated the length of my regional career. I put myself at a regional so that I could be qualified and experienced when the majors needed to fill seats. I am here because I wanted to better my career, to move on. You gave up the seats that I am stuck flying. And until you all at certain majors begin to show the backbone (AMR and CAL have held the scope line pretty well), the only thing I can look forward to is a bigger plane at my company.
Rightseat Ballast is offline  
Old 04-06-2009, 03:17 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
contrail67's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 737
Posts: 590
Default

Originally Posted by BarbieTrash
I hope I am wrong as well! Anything more than 66 seats is hazardous to my career progression. It's tough to see Mainline flying chipped away one E-jet at a time...

Hazardous to your career progression???...Above 66-70 seats will STOP your career progression. 50-70 seats was hazardous to your career progression.
Glad to see an RJ person have some goals though.
contrail67 is offline  
Old 04-06-2009, 05:42 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CANAM's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: 1986 LeBaron Convertable
Posts: 439
Default

For the sake of future arguments, can everybody please not reference FAs as a source of reference for postings.
CANAM is offline  
Old 04-06-2009, 06:18 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: Right...CL65
Posts: 279
Default

Originally Posted by Rightseat Ballast
Yes. two RAH certificates have been approved for branded flying. Those approvals are just contingency plans. With Airways and United on ever unstable ground financially, RAH needs a plan for its aircraft should a major partner go away. Independence (ACA branded) came to be only because it lost its contract with United. ExpressJet did branded flying because it lost a significant amount of Continental flying. Neither airline went branded because they thought it was a good idea. They did it because they needed to generate some revenue, even if only enough to prolong the inevitable. RAH would do branded flying under the same circumstances, with the notable exception being Mokulele should RAH choose to assume further control.

RAH management wants 190's, and they are pretty good at getting their way. Labor contracts are merely bumps in the road to them. I have no preference either way at this point. You can tell me that getting 190's at RAH is career suicide, but this is coming from the guys who have watched the mainline job crumble beneath them. Age 65 extended my career at a regional. Mainline weakness in regards to scope has extended my career at a regional. You all make it sound as though I am the one choosing to settle for less and undermine my future, but it has always been the votes of mainline pilots and politicians that have dictated the length of my regional career. I put myself at a regional so that I could be qualified and experienced when the majors needed to fill seats. I am here because I wanted to better my career, to move on. You gave up the seats that I am stuck flying. And until you all at certain majors begin to show the backbone (AMR and CAL have held the scope line pretty well), the only thing I can look forward to is a bigger plane at my company.

Enjoy a life of crappy pay flying "big" planes at a crappy regional. That's all I have to say about that.
xtreme is offline  
Old 04-06-2009, 06:48 AM
  #48  
Portuguese Troubleshooter
 
ImEbee's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Burrito Bomber
Posts: 370
Default

However RAH flies 190's, branded or not, it will be a mainline a/c on a regional payscale!
ImEbee is offline  
Old 04-06-2009, 07:29 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Aviatormar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: CH2T Worst plane ever
Posts: 673
Default

I mean rightseat ballast, are you kidding? I love it when guys who fly smaller equipment are making more money, and I love that my concessionary contract makes more money then your current contract.
Aviatormar is offline  
Old 04-06-2009, 08:07 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
seattlepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 790
Default

Originally Posted by Rightseat Ballast
Yes. two RAH certificates have been approved for branded flying. Those approvals are just contingency plans. With Airways and United on ever unstable ground financially, RAH needs a plan for its aircraft should a major partner go away. Independence (ACA branded) came to be only because it lost its contract with United. ExpressJet did branded flying because it lost a significant amount of Continental flying. Neither airline went branded because they thought it was a good idea. They did it because they needed to generate some revenue, even if only enough to prolong the inevitable. RAH would do branded flying under the same circumstances, with the notable exception being Mokulele should RAH choose to assume further control.

RAH management wants 190's, and they are pretty good at getting their way. Labor contracts are merely bumps in the road to them. I have no preference either way at this point. You can tell me that getting 190's at RAH is career suicide, but this is coming from the guys who have watched the mainline job crumble beneath them. Age 65 extended my career at a regional. Mainline weakness in regards to scope has extended my career at a regional. You all make it sound as though I am the one choosing to settle for less and undermine my future, but it has always been the votes of mainline pilots and politicians that have dictated the length of my regional career. I put myself at a regional so that I could be qualified and experienced when the majors needed to fill seats. I am here because I wanted to better my career, to move on. You gave up the seats that I am stuck flying. And until you all at certain majors begin to show the backbone (AMR and CAL have held the scope line pretty well), the only thing I can look forward to is a bigger plane at my company.
awesome points...
seattlepilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
B1900YX
Regional
36
11-06-2008 03:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices