RAH and 190's
#162
Would you also agree with this statement Bond?
#163
Banned
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 698
Check yourself next time, because the courts took away a lot of that flying.
#164
#166
Banned
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 698
I took regional out and put mainline in from a post by Bond. Not a big ego just pointing out how hypocritical mainline pilots are for blaming this mess on regional pilots. Ask yourself, did we mainline pilots allow this to happen? Check yourself, and place the blame where it belongs.
Mainline pilots are not those responsible.
Just because you fly a 170, doesn't mean you have to justify yourself.
#169
Just think of where we'd be if DALPA hadn't been too good to fly the CRJ back in 1991, and instead made it a mainline aircraft instead of letting it go to Comair.
Just think of where we'd be if US Airways, who had some of the tightest RJ scope prior to 9/11, had held the line at a small number of 50 seat jets...and later 70 seat jets.
And finally, think of where we'll be if CALPA doesn't hold the scope line at 50 seat turbojets.
Scope isn't taken, it is SOLD...sold for work rules, sold for narrow/widebody payrates, sold for pension considerations, and when scope is sold it and the jobs associated with it don't ever come back. The sooner you and everybody else realizes that simple fact the sooner regional pilots and mainline pilots can IN UNITY start to "take it back"; until then, it'll be petty sniping at each other.
#170
Banned
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 698
Scope was not sold, it was taken under threat.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post