Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
TSA/ Go Jet integration sticker >

TSA/ Go Jet integration sticker

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

TSA/ Go Jet integration sticker

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-13-2009, 01:08 PM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 208
Default

Originally Posted by TrevorW
Don't take me out of context. I will not fly struck work. I said it would be more expensive to give GoJet TSA flying than it would be for TSA to get a raise. GoJet has 50 seat rates in their contract that are greater than TSA's. If TSA goes on strike, Chautaqua and anyone else will pick up some 50 seat flying for United. I guess that will be different though because "it's not their choice," "it's managment." Just like when Republic started flying for Midwest or Skywest for Skyway.
No. Chautaqua wouldn't fly struck work, either.
SpiraMirabilis is offline  
Old 03-13-2009, 01:38 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Xelectro's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: CRJ-700
Posts: 177
Default

Ok here is some food for thought. And in no way do I agree with this type of behavior in any way. But hypothetically speaking what if company "A" Goes on strike and work is offered to company "B" to compesate for the strtike. How many people at company "B" would refuse to come to work of go on strike. Yeah alot of people might agree that it's wrong and it is. But how many people would actually stand up and refuse to fly. When it comes to the bottom line, that is having a job, not alot of people would protest. I know there is a rumor at XJT among some pilots going on, that the Flying we did for united in Early 2008 will come into play later this year when TSA will be dissolved and XJT will fly their planes. I know i am probably not a highly respected member on this board due to some points of view that some people might disagree with. But here is my point, just like most companies out there that only care about their bottom line, same rule applies to alot of people on personal level as well. Threaten someones job and they will do what you want therm to do, even if it's immoral or wrong. The bottom line is what people care about. Everything else is just for the show. Again not something that I beleive is right, just speaking from experiance of dealing with people.
Xelectro is offline  
Old 03-13-2009, 01:56 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
jaded's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: Airline #4
Posts: 450
Default

Originally Posted by Xelectro
Ok here is some food for thought. And in no way do I agree with this type of behavior in any way. But hypothetically speaking what if company "A" Goes on strike and work is offered to company "B" to compesate for the strtike. How many people at company "B" would refuse to come to work of go on strike. Yeah alot of people might agree that it's wrong and it is. But how many people would actually stand up and refuse to fly. When it comes to the bottom line, that is having a job, not alot of people would protest. I know there is a rumor at XJT among some pilots going on, that the Flying we did for united in Early 2008 will come into play later this year when TSA will be dissolved and XJT will fly their planes. I know i am probably not a highly respected member on this board due to some points of view that some people might disagree with. But here is my point, just like most companies out there that only care about their bottom line, same rule applies to alot of people on personal level as well. Threaten someones job and they will do what you want therm to do, even if it's immoral or wrong. The bottom line is what people care about. Everything else is just for the show. Again not something that I beleive is right, just speaking from experiance of dealing with people.
The point your missing is, you already have work, and there's plenty apparently if you guys are hiring street caps. What you're saying is you will take work at the cost of a fellow pilot's job. Taking struck work makes you a scab.
jaded is offline  
Old 03-13-2009, 02:04 PM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
STILL GROUNDED's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 1,105
Default

Maybe I am off base here but it looks like tsa is going down anyhow. If all the TSA pilots would come together and not move an airplane on time for just one day management may notice that you have some unity and start listening. Because when today's delays are 5 minutes and tomorrows are 10 and so on the code shares are going to make TSA do something about it or Hulas is going to loose the flying. They can't give all the flying to go jet that quick, they are going to have to meet some demands and if they don't what do you have to loose, they certainly can't fire everyone. We are no more unified at RW but at the moment we don't have fire fight on our hands. Not criticizing, just saying...
STILL GROUNDED is offline  
Old 03-13-2009, 02:21 PM
  #55  
Sprung
 
Positive_Rate's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 674
Default

Originally Posted by Xelectro
Ok here is some food for thought. And in no way do I agree with this type of behavior in any way. But hypothetically speaking what if company "A" Goes on strike and work is offered to company "B" to compesate for the strtike. How many people at company "B" would refuse to come to work of go on strike. Yeah alot of people might agree that it's wrong and it is. But how many people would actually stand up and refuse to fly. When it comes to the bottom line, that is having a job, not alot of people would protest. I know there is a rumor at XJT among some pilots going on, that the Flying we did for united in Early 2008 will come into play later this year when TSA will be dissolved and XJT will fly their planes. I know i am probably not a highly respected member on this board due to some points of view that some people might disagree with. But here is my point, just like most companies out there that only care about their bottom line, same rule applies to alot of people on personal level as well. Threaten someones job and they will do what you want therm to do, even if it's immoral or wrong. The bottom line is what people care about. Everything else is just for the show. Again not something that I beleive is right, just speaking from experiance of dealing with people.

I stick to my previous prediction that you will end up on a scab list before your career is over.

Originally Posted by STILL GROUNDED
Maybe I am off base here but it looks like tsa is going down anyhow. If all the TSA pilots would come together and not move an airplane on time for just one day management may notice that you have some unity and start listening. Because when today's delays are 5 minutes and tomorrows are 10 and so on the code shares are going to make TSA do something about it or Hulas is going to loose the flying. They can't give all the flying to go jet that quick, they are going to have to meet some demands and if they don't what do you have to loose, they certainly can't fire everyone. We are no more unified at RW but at the moment we don't have fire fight on our hands. Not criticizing, just saying...
The TSA pilots are together. We are a very strong pilot group. We are solid in the fact that we aren't going to roll over for a sub-par contract with no job security when our "sister" is growing and hiring. We are not going to do anything illegal now or ever especially while we are in this vital times for our contract. What you described would be instantly picked up on my mgmt as a job action and would have further consequences.
Positive_Rate is offline  
Old 03-13-2009, 03:50 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
250 or point 65's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 999
Default

Originally Posted by STILL GROUNDED
Maybe I am off base here but it looks like tsa is going down anyhow. If all the TSA pilots would come together and not move an airplane on time for just one day management may notice that you have some unity and start listening. Because when today's delays are 5 minutes and tomorrows are 10 and so on the code shares are going to make TSA do something about it or Hulas is going to loose the flying. They can't give all the flying to go jet that quick, they are going to have to meet some demands and if they don't what do you have to loose, they certainly can't fire everyone. We are no more unified at RW but at the moment we don't have fire fight on our hands. Not criticizing, just saying...
It amazes me every time how pilots have NO IDEA about the RLA.

No man, you're right, the NMB (who is on our side and basically waiting for Obama's Dem nominee) wouldn't think this is a job action.
250 or point 65 is offline  
Old 03-13-2009, 04:09 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,530
Default

Originally Posted by Xelectro
Ok here is some food for thought. And in no way do I agree with this type of behavior in any way. But hypothetically speaking what if company "A" Goes on strike and work is offered to company "B" to compesate for the strtike. How many people at company "B" would refuse to come to work of go on strike. Yeah alot of people might agree that it's wrong and it is. But how many people would actually stand up and refuse to fly. When it comes to the bottom line, that is having a job, not alot of people would protest. I know there is a rumor at XJT among some pilots going on, that the Flying we did for united in Early 2008 will come into play later this year when TSA will be dissolved and XJT will fly their planes. I know i am probably not a highly respected member on this board due to some points of view that some people might disagree with. But here is my point, just like most companies out there that only care about their bottom line, same rule applies to alot of people on personal level as well. Threaten someones job and they will do what you want therm to do, even if it's immoral or wrong. The bottom line is what people care about. Everything else is just for the show. Again not something that I beleive is right, just speaking from experiance of dealing with people.
xelectro, lay off the weed while waiting for that class date. Now we know what this is all about because why would someone from XJET even remotely care about TSA going down?? For you this not a scab issues or even a GJ TSA issue. It's because you want TSA to die so XJET can fly for UA! Seriously man you are what is wrong with this industry. And you have a serious deficiency in understanding how labor works, especially at the airlines... Nothing will happen at TSA, it's not going anywhere Hulas likes to keep things quiet, private company and one of the most conservative airlines out there, that's why they furlough so often. It's the way he's done it since the beginning.
Purpleanga is offline  
Old 03-13-2009, 11:09 PM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
STILL GROUNDED's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 1,105
Default

Originally Posted by Positive_Rate

The TSA pilots are together. What you described would be instantly picked up on my mgmt as a job action and would have further consequences.
I didn't mean to imply that the TSA pilots are not together, and it should be immediately picked up as a job action. What are they going to do, call Reagan in to fire everyone, they are already giving your flying away. What do you have too loose.

You can't have your union organize it (thats a job action), it's got to be done quietly among your "together" pilot group. There is no one able to pick up that much flying at a moments notice so they can't cover it. Hell if comes too it start writing up all the stuff that should be written up in the first place. There are 20 ways to ground an ERJ, I am told.

Then again, all of us are sideline quaterbacking, If we don't work at TSA we should just shut up. I'll go first.
STILL GROUNDED is offline  
Old 03-14-2009, 01:42 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
laserman2431's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 226
Default

Originally Posted by STILL GROUNDED
I didn't mean to imply that the TSA pilots are not together, and it should be immediately picked up as a job action. What are they going to do, call Reagan in to fire everyone, they are already giving your flying away. What do you have too loose.

You can't have your union organize it (thats a job action), it's got to be done quietly among your "together" pilot group. There is no one able to pick up that much flying at a moments notice so they can't cover it. Hell if comes too it start writing up all the stuff that should be written up in the first place. There are 20 ways to ground an ERJ, I am told.

Then again, all of us are sideline quaterbacking, If we don't work at TSA we should just shut up. I'll go first.
I think, at this point, you should ask youself, "what would sully do?" Let's just say that you have just ingested a flock of birds and both engines are going off line.

Last edited by laserman2431; 03-14-2009 at 01:55 AM.
laserman2431 is offline  
Old 03-14-2009, 06:36 AM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
STILL GROUNDED's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 1,105
Default

Originally Posted by laserman2431
I think, at this point, you should ask youself, "what would sully do?" Let's just say that you have just ingested a flock of birds and both engines are going off line.
Nice pic, Mesa Pride! You vote?
STILL GROUNDED is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
multipilot
Aviation Law
7
05-14-2010 10:08 AM
Justdoinmyjob
Regional
34
06-04-2009 11:05 AM
fireman0174
Foreign
2
10-12-2008 07:03 PM
WAVIT Inbound
Regional
1
09-18-2008 10:21 AM
JiffyLube
Major
4
08-21-2008 07:49 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices