Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
New FACTS from NTSB on Colgan 3407 >

New FACTS from NTSB on Colgan 3407

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

New FACTS from NTSB on Colgan 3407

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-18-2009, 09:02 AM
  #181  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,814
Default

I did not think it was typical of the NTSB to issue daily updates on accidents such as this...why start now? It seems hard to comprehend that both Pilots allowed the aircraft to enter a deep stall...getting anxious to know what the CVR reveals.
ExperimentalAB is offline  
Old 02-18-2009, 09:06 AM
  #182  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,105
Default

They've always held press conferences. This is not new.

-Fatty
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 02-18-2009, 09:15 AM
  #183  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,814
Default

Press conferences, of course...but I don't think they've ever gone back and forth as they have this week as in other accident investigations.
ExperimentalAB is offline  
Old 03-16-2009, 07:42 PM
  #184  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: MU2-60
Posts: 25
Default

Originally Posted by ehaeckercfi
Do you honestly believe that? After 9/11, a furloughed United pilot could have been the most junior pilot at SkyWest, but one of the most experienced. ANY professional pilot should know that.

If my statement is a lie why wasn't this trip being flown by a more senior crew? Cuz they didn't want it.

Sure some of the junior guys/gals could have previous 121 experience but not all. I stand pat on my statement. Been there, seen it, today the regionals are the training grounds for majors and even corporate operators like Netjets. After three or four years of being abused everyone except the very senior are looking for a way out.


My opinion in no way reflects solely on the pilots if this accident, it is not known at this time if experience or the lack of it was a factor and I do not want to prejudge. My statement only reflects a general opinion of regional management’s cost cutting measures in the area of safety, flight training and schedule's that tax the hardiest of bodies young or old.
bluefishbeagle is offline  
Old 03-18-2009, 10:43 AM
  #185  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,105
Default

Any update on this accident?
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 03-18-2009, 03:02 PM
  #186  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captain152's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,258
Default

That could be the case ... but also take into account the simple fact that there are reserve pilots for a reason. Granted I work at Colgan and have heard NOTHING stating that either pilot was on reserve. I also know, and I'm sure you've thought of this yourself, that some of the trips on the senior lines are also on the junior lines (just not in the amount they might be in the senior lines). I don't know much about the Q lines here, but I know that it goes the same way down in IAH where we have virtually the same operation just with a different aircraft.

I do respect your viewpoint though, and agree with you in regards of cost cutting measures in operations.





I have not heard any update on any NTSB findings, but I know that Colgan held several roadshows recently to update all who attended on what has taken place so far. If I find out any new info, I will be sure to post here.
captain152 is offline  
Old 03-19-2009, 06:53 AM
  #187  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: CL-65 F/O
Posts: 265
Default

Originally Posted by captain152
I have not heard any update on any NTSB findings, but I know that Colgan held several roadshows recently to update all who attended on what has taken place so far. If I find out any new info, I will be sure to post here.
Yeah thanks, please do. I was hoping to attend the one in IAD, but I've just been so busy with stuff here I haven't had a chance to!!
DublinFlyer is offline  
Old 03-19-2009, 03:22 PM
  #188  
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
Thread Starter
 
The Juice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Default

ALPA is doing the shows, Colgan mgmt could care less in keeping us informed
The Juice is offline  
Old 03-19-2009, 07:11 PM
  #189  
Moderator
 
usmc-sgt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,966
Default

For the record there are no "senior" lines at Colgan on the Q in Newark. There are reserve lines and there are other lines. You would be hard pressed to look at any one of our lines besides the few reserve lines and say which one(s) are senior.

Colgan does not know how to build a senior line. Look at the number one pilot in base and the last line holder and compare their lines and they will be very similiar with the exception that the senior one can pick his poision.
usmc-sgt is offline  
Old 03-20-2009, 03:55 AM
  #190  
Gets Weekends Off
 
texaspilot76's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Right Seat
Posts: 1,458
Default

We got an email at PSA from the company advising of an erratic glideslope on the same runway in Buffalo that the Colgan flight was lined up for.

I personally have seen the dangers of an erratic glideslope. The north runway's glideslope going into KAVL is erratic. It has been reported on numerous ASAP reports. In solid IMC, the glideslope immediatly shot way down. The autopilot suddenly pitched down to follow it. Then the slope shot back up, and the airplane pitched up to follow it, causing a rapid decrease in airspeed. I managed to firewall the power just in time to avoid a stickshaker. At that time, I had to hand fly the rest of the approach and try to stay in the middle of the dancing glideslope. Not a very safe situation. Had i not been paying attention, it could have had a drastic outcome.

The NTSB needs to investigate the glideslope in Buffalo. It could hold the answers to the Colgan accident. The data of how the aircraft pitched up and lost airspeed and then stalled is identical to what I experienced in AVL. That coupled with the fact that the glideslope in Buffalo had been reported as erratic.
texaspilot76 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
usmc-sgt
Regional
44
03-11-2012 02:04 PM
FlyJSH
Regional
19
08-11-2010 03:29 PM
aFflIgHt
Regional
1
01-16-2009 03:52 AM
whtever
Regional
109
12-15-2008 09:12 PM
cptmorgancrunch
Regional
5
10-21-2008 05:17 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices