? for Shuttle America
01-11-2009, 01:19 PM
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: AMR Big one
Posts: 177
U can hide behind MGT... But you PILOT are the ones who signed a CBA that pays FO's $37/hr... That's why we are upset!!! The BLAME does fall on your pilots for that....
01-11-2009, 01:20 PM
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 744 CA
Posts: 4,772
Well at least you admit its DAL mainline MGT who made these decisions. Of course there are some on this board who would say that S5 pilots should refuse to fly those routes ...they would be wrong.. but they are out there.
01-11-2009, 01:23 PM
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 744 CA
Posts: 4,772
Probably less than a couple hundred of the nearly 2000 pilots at RAH were there when the current contract was signed.... so I say again... dont blame the pilots. And lets be honest..... pilot compensation when compared to the other costs of running an airline are probably not even in the top 3 or 4.
01-11-2009, 01:39 PM
#24
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
01-11-2009, 02:24 PM
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 408
mainline guys are the ones that signed the CBA allowing their management to hand it over to the $37/hr guy....
Last edited by reelbigchair; 01-12-2009 at 12:00 AM.
01-11-2009, 02:35 PM
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 1,105
01-11-2009, 02:59 PM
#27
The NeverEnding Story
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,618
Yup...closest I've come to flying a 170 was sitting on the jumpseat when I worked at AWAC!
I've said it many times, and I'll say it again: RAH's E175/190 CA payrates from their 2003 contract are +/- 1% of AWAC's B146 CA rates from the 2003 concessionary contract. Nobody *****ed about what AWAC pilots made flying the BAC.
FOs on the other hand...yeah, that DESPERATELY needs to be remedied, and I'm 100% positive all current RAH pilots feel the same way.
I've said it many times, and I'll say it again: RAH's E175/190 CA payrates from their 2003 contract are +/- 1% of AWAC's B146 CA rates from the 2003 concessionary contract. Nobody *****ed about what AWAC pilots made flying the BAC.
FOs on the other hand...yeah, that DESPERATELY needs to be remedied, and I'm 100% positive all current RAH pilots feel the same way.
01-11-2009, 03:49 PM
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 744 CA
Posts: 4,772
Yup...closest I've come to flying a 170 was sitting on the jumpseat when I worked at AWAC!
I've said it many times, and I'll say it again: RAH's E175/190 CA payrates from their 2003 contract are +/- 1% of AWAC's B146 CA rates from the 2003 concessionary contract. Nobody *****ed about what AWAC pilots made flying the BAC.
FOs on the other hand...yeah, that DESPERATELY needs to be remedied, and I'm 100% positive all current RAH pilots feel the same way.
I've said it many times, and I'll say it again: RAH's E175/190 CA payrates from their 2003 contract are +/- 1% of AWAC's B146 CA rates from the 2003 concessionary contract. Nobody *****ed about what AWAC pilots made flying the BAC.
FOs on the other hand...yeah, that DESPERATELY needs to be remedied, and I'm 100% positive all current RAH pilots feel the same way.
I LOVE Anchorman. So funny. 
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
