Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
How TOUGH is Great Lakes Training >

How TOUGH is Great Lakes Training

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

How TOUGH is Great Lakes Training

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-30-2008, 01:20 PM
  #31  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: seeking the right seat
Posts: 64
Default

I remember a couple years back one of my instructors told me that they were going to phase out some if not all ndbs? Anyone know if this is true cause I know here in the northeast there are plenty of ndbs.And i just shot an Ndb approach not too long ago and it wasn't hard.
rlh724 is offline  
Old 11-30-2008, 01:20 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 939
Default

Originally Posted by BURflyer
I can't imagine doing anything above other than an ILS or VOR single engine during a checkride or training for that matter.
way to show confidence there in your abilities
Dont you think the passengers deserve a little more out of your training? If you can't be bothered to train a SE NDB approach you really do not belong in this industry.
IBPilot is offline  
Old 11-30-2008, 01:25 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ebl14's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 73N
Posts: 862
Default

I agree with Mooney, why shouldn't you be required to fly each of those approaches? Whats next... pilots shouldn't be required to maintain altitude without an autopilot? Emergencies happen all the time, not just when its convienent for the pilot. It does however suck when the instructors aren't worth a crap and aren't willing to help people out with stuff related specifically to learning how to fly the particular aircraft.
ebl14 is offline  
Old 11-30-2008, 01:34 PM
  #34  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 781
Default

Originally Posted by IBPilot
way to show confidence there in your abilities
Dont you think the passengers deserve a little more out of your training? If you can't be bothered to train a SE NDB approach you really do not belong in this industry.
Huh? Half the people out there can't fly their airliners without their flight directors let alone single engine NDB. Have you been through a pt121 training event lately? You might do a VOR approach with a flight director once just to be sure.
BURflyer is offline  
Old 11-30-2008, 02:12 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 939
Default

Originally Posted by BURflyer
Have you been through a pt121 training event lately?

oh yes, in the past 13 years I've been through about 6 135 checks and about 25 or so PC's/PT's.....plus some type ratings...nice try please play again.
IBPilot is offline  
Old 11-30-2008, 02:19 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,839
Default

fly the following approaches, before entering training: LOC, LOC DME, LOC BC, LOC BC DME, VOR, VOR DME, ILS, ILS DME, and NDB.
Originally Posted by mooney
Personally I believe that should be how every 121 training outfit should be. If you don't have those abilities you shouldn't even be applying to somewhere that flies 19-90 paying passengers...
I haven't flown any one of those approaches in over 20 years so I can't say I have those abilities right now, but I'm pretty sure that I can be retrained/retaught. Now I've flown some approaches that are fairly similar to some of those mentioned so I think I could make it through but with the advertised washout rate it sounds harder than even Marine OCS!

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 11-30-2008, 02:20 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 939
Default

Originally Posted by BURflyer
Huh? Half the people out there can't fly their airliners without their flight directors let alone single engine NDB.
Then you work with a bunch of guys who should not be in a 121 cockpit.
IBPilot is offline  
Old 11-30-2008, 02:27 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Beech 1900D
Posts: 280
Default

Originally Posted by BURflyer
That's pretty impressive. Do you have to demonstrate all of these to be signed off for the checkride? When you say they give you abnormals during these approaches, you're saying caution stuff right? I can't imagine doing anything above other than an ILS or VOR single engine during a checkride or training for that matter.
It's not necessarily all of them, right down the list, but you could expect any of them during training. Those are all the approaches we are approved to do. They really don't slam FO candidates with abnormals, although you will definitely see some. Abnormals are roughly equal to caution items, but include more items than just what is illuminated by the caution annunciators. You are guaranteed to experience the following, at some point: ILS, single-engine ILS, a few non-precision approaches (NDB guaranteed!), circling approach, missed approach procedures, landing single-engine, go-around procedures, DPs, every imaginable stall, steep turns, rejected takeoffs, V1 cuts, crosswind procedures, some abnormal procedures, and any emergency procedure that is in the book. You may see single-engine non-precisions during training, but I don't believe it is a checkride requirement (don't quote me on that). Probably more than that, but that's all that comes to the top of my head.

Last edited by 1900luxuryliner; 11-30-2008 at 02:45 PM.
1900luxuryliner is offline  
Old 11-30-2008, 02:50 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
blastoff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 1,531
Default

Originally Posted by rlh724
I remember a couple years back one of my instructors told me that they were going to phase out some if not all ndbs?
They've been saying that for years...ever notice that many ILS Marker Beacons are changing to an NDB Locator on the Outer Marker...even recently? Still need them to identify the FAF when the GS is OTS.

They've been telling us the whole VOR system will go away for just as long. Wonder what's going to happen when someone sets off an EMP in space that takes out GPS. Better hope you have a Navigator on board with a sextant.
blastoff is offline  
Old 11-30-2008, 03:28 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Beech 1900D
Posts: 280
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
... Odds are that you are going to acquire a permanent black mark on your record for your trouble. GL isn't that great of a job to begin with...

And don't kid yourself, even if you got through the program, it is just plain bad. With that kind of attrition, luck plays just as much of a role as skill. If their standards are REALLY that high, they should either:

A. Screen for the desired skill level at the interview OR
B. Provide enough training to get most new-hires up to the desired skill level.
You won't receive anything on your record if you bomb out of the training. You're not considered an employee until you pass the checkride. The training process could be considered an extension to your job interview. Anything that happens in training, no matter how bad you do, is NOT PRIA reportable. So, there is nothing to lose by giving it a shot. I don't think they should have to train people to fly basic instruments, and I'm not pro-management, whatsoever. If a person can't fly an ILS without going full-scale deflection, enter a hold, or fly a non-precision approach, how the heck could that same person expect to safely hand-fly a turbine aircraft full of passengers into a mountain airport, in bad weather with a contaminated runway. This experience is not a rare event. It's every day on the job. I don't understand how some candidates were ever able to get their instrument rating. I sure as heck wouldn't want to be their passenger while in IMC conditions...Those types shouldn't be able to make it through the training.
1900luxuryliner is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
skatergeek
Part 135
19
03-27-2019 03:28 PM
papacharlie
Regional
36
03-07-2012 08:25 PM
CaptainTeezy
Regional
29
11-28-2008 12:09 PM
LOW FUEL
Regional
17
11-20-2008 06:10 AM
FlyingPirate
Regional
86
11-11-2008 09:11 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices