Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
2 airlines + 7 regionals = someone left holding themselves >

2 airlines + 7 regionals = someone left holding themselves

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

2 airlines + 7 regionals = someone left holding themselves

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2008, 06:46 AM
  #31  
Used to get weekends off
 
p1ayn's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: BusFo
Posts: 581
Default

Originally Posted by andy171773
You PNCL guys just can't get it through your skulls..not that i'm wishing any malice on ya'll..but c'mon..wake up

WHO CARES that your contract was signed by NW. That means DL can't violate it?

DELTA signed ASA's and Comair's contracts...and they're doing whatever they please with em.
Andy..very well said. I have been saying that contracts mean NOTHING! Abosolutely NOTHING! Delta will, has and will continue to do whatever they want to make their plan work, as Comair has witnessed. Noone and I mean noone including he NWA side is exempt.
p1ayn is offline  
Old 11-23-2008, 06:47 AM
  #32  
Used to get weekends off
 
p1ayn's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2006
Position: BusFo
Posts: 581
Default

Originally Posted by P-51D
it wont be e9...too good performance for nwa and money maker...although anything can happen in this industry.
Thats just funny and naive.
p1ayn is offline  
Old 11-23-2008, 07:33 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ThunderChicken's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320
Posts: 110
Default

I can't figure out this euphoric feeling that 9E pilots have. You have newer airplanes, that doesn't make any difference whatsoever. Your performance on the NWA side is great but they run things different than DAL, look at your performance in ATL and you will see what I mean. Your cheaper, but if you guys get a new contract (which you deserve), and it is a good one, then there goes the cost advantage. Plus, Delta will require more crews per airplane than you have now, increasing cost even more. NWA does not exist anymore (technically). It is a Delta world now and you guys have to realize things are not going to be the same. NO ONE knows what is going to happen, EVERYONE has a chance at growth, shrinkage, bankruptcy, more airplanes, whatever.
ThunderChicken is offline  
Old 11-23-2008, 08:53 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SrfNFly227's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: PIC Challenger 605
Posts: 454
Default

Originally Posted by ThunderChicken
You have newer airplanes, that doesn't make any difference whatsoever.
Actually this does make a difference. Newer airplanes are going to have a lower operating cost (Fuel burn, maintenance problems, etc). If DL decides it is going to start parking 200's, it won't be the new ones.

Originally Posted by ThunderChicken
Your performance on the NWA side is great but they run things different than DAL, look at your performance in ATL and you will see what I mean.
ATL is a different game than our NWA bases. From what I understood, we were set up for failure from the beginning (gates too far apart, ops too far away, unrealistic block times). These problems were addressed and when we kept the contract, our numbers got significantly better. Also, performance numbers are very good in MEM, DTW, and MSP. Are they the best??? I am not sure. But at our operating cost, they are surely competitive.

Originally Posted by ThunderChicken
Your cheaper, but if you guys get a new contract (which you deserve), and it is a good one, then there goes the cost advantage. Plus, Delta will require more crews per airplane than you have now, increasing cost even more.
This is actually a very good point. It is something that I am concerned about. It is also something that I hope our union is considering while in negotiations. While I do think that we deserve more money and better work rules, I don't want industry leading by any measure. Industry leading only makes you less competitive in the new aviation world.



I should point out that I have no idea who will keep what flying. I don't think anybody could know, including DL. I am simply pointing out why some at Pinnacle feel that we have a good shot at keeping what we currently operate. I personally think that DL will cut whichever contracts the lawyers decide are easiest to get out of. I say grab some popcorn and watch it happen. As pilots, there is nothing we can do to stop any of it.
SrfNFly227 is offline  
Old 11-23-2008, 09:28 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
thrustsetrj200's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 195
Default

[quote=SrfNFly227;504629]Actually this does make a difference. Newer airplanes are going to have a lower operating cost (Fuel burn, maintenance problems, etc). If DL decides it is going to start parking 200's, it won't be the new ones.

Mesaba and Pinnacle know full well that "big daddy mainline" (that goes for NWA and DL) has NO problem swapping aircraft between their regionals. Mesaba got 16 or 17 of Pinnacles newer CRJ200s. Just handed them over. Also, DL decided to hand over the few CRJ900s that Pinnacle is currently operating to Mesaba. So just because you have the newest CRJ200s today doesn't mean you will be keeping them.
I also have a real hard time reading someone brag that their airline has the lowest operating costs. That means LOW wages and that's not the direction we should be going. But I understand that makes a regional competitive. Where do you draw the line??
thrustsetrj200 is offline  
Old 11-23-2008, 09:46 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CTPILOT's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Up front
Posts: 396
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32
Well, Compass, Comair, Mesaba and whomever are wholly owned should be prepared for a huge whipsaw like AMR did with the multiple subcontractors all flying as Eagle back in the early 90's. The Eagle guys took a 16 year contract that really sucks in exchange for a single pilot list.... well it sux by todays standards, back then it was pretty good.... most of the rest have caught up by now. Anyway, then the scope section was so poorly worded that it allowed them, years later, to subcontract with TSA and CHQ... setting up yet another round of whipsawing.

Watch your six guys (and gals)
very true. I am gonna bring up the subject of a wholly owned merger, like Ealge is made up of multiple regionals like BizEx e.t.c. It would be crazy but again its crazy times. At Comair we just got a new CEO and doing massive downsizing so were guessing the "M" word is a potential.
CTPILOT is offline  
Old 11-23-2008, 09:52 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ThunderChicken's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320
Posts: 110
Default

Newer airplanes means they are easier to sell. There is still a big market for our 50 seat friends overseas. I agree newer airplanes are more efficient, but not to the point where the opportunity cost of keeping them is greater than selling them. Just my opinion, no flamebait intended at all.
ThunderChicken is offline  
Old 11-23-2008, 09:54 AM
  #38  
Property of Scheduling
 
higney85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Bus driver
Posts: 2,575
Default

[QUOTE=thrustsetrj200;504644]
Originally Posted by SrfNFly227
Actually this does make a difference. Newer airplanes are going to have a lower operating cost (Fuel burn, maintenance problems, etc). If DL decides it is going to start parking 200's, it won't be the new ones.

Mesaba and Pinnacle know full well that "big daddy mainline" (that goes for NWA and DL) has NO problem swapping aircraft between their regionals. Mesaba got 16 or 17 of Pinnacles newer CRJ200s. Just handed them over. Also, DL decided to hand over the few CRJ900s that Pinnacle is currently operating to Mesaba. So just because you have the newest CRJ200s today doesn't mean you will be keeping them.
I also have a real hard time reading someone brag that their airline has the lowest operating costs. That means LOW wages and that's not the direction we should be going. But I understand that makes a regional competitive. Where do you draw the line??

You disregard 2 facts from the points you are making.

The 16 airframe transfer of -200's was written into our ASA with NWA. If we did not have a pilot contract in place by March 31st, 2008 we lost them. We obviously did not have a contract and around aug/sept the planes had all been transfered.

The 7 900's pncl will transfer to mesaba were the 7 we were to operate "temporarily" from Mesa. The transfer/delivery schedule from 9E to XJ is the same delivery schedule of 9E's remaining order of -900's from bombardier.


I refuse to acknowledge any "euphoric" feeling on the 9E side, just correcting any misnomers that are stated on public boards. When going through 9E crewrooms the "doom and gloom" discussions are abundant. Time will tell what happens to everyone, I for one am nervous but also in full understanding that beyond doing my job to the best of my ability there is nothing I can do and worrying only impacts my QOL negatively.

The operating cost discussion is dead on. There are more senior (relative) groups that are more expensive but with the very junior levels at XJ and Compass this fact gets negated overall.
higney85 is offline  
Old 11-23-2008, 09:55 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,369
Default

Originally Posted by thrustsetrj200
Mesaba and Pinnacle know full well that "big daddy mainline" (that goes for NWA and DL) has NO problem swapping aircraft between their regionals. Mesaba got 16 or 17 of Pinnacles newer CRJ200s. Just handed them over. Also, DL decided to hand over the few CRJ900s that Pinnacle is currently operating to Mesaba. So just because you have the newest CRJ200s today doesn't mean you will be keeping them.
Well at least they can't get rid of 11 of our airplanes. Anything with PQ on the tail can't be touched by Delta unless we go out of business.
cencal83406 is online now  
Old 11-23-2008, 10:20 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ebl14's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 73N
Posts: 863
Default

To address all of the shots to the ribs from one pilot group to another:

The current situation is not a new one. Over the years there are usually some airlines furloughing and some hiring. I think the youth of the pilots on this board is very obvious with a large number of these posts. When you choose a place to work it is a total GUESS as to whether or not it will be a good choice in the long run. If you are furloughed... too bad but you may have guessed wrong, but don't worry most of us will be in your shoes at some point in our careers as well. If you are at a growing airline you need to feel lucky for being where you are and also know that you may be the one in the furloughees shoes in the future, so try to use a little more thought and insight before you start your celebrations. The bottom line is... lucky or not, don't hate your fellow pilots. We will only survive and maintain our status as a group of highly qualified professionals if those of us one the lucky side can support those who aren't so lucky. So check your ego at the door and lets try to help each other out instead of cut each other down.
ebl14 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vagabond
Major
6
11-03-2008 11:29 AM
vagabond
Major
15
10-12-2008 12:07 PM
Splanky
Regional
11
09-17-2008 02:52 PM
DLax85
Cargo
3
08-30-2008 07:00 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
02-26-2005 11:49 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices