Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
New rumor - RAH and Alaska Airline >

New rumor - RAH and Alaska Airline

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

New rumor - RAH and Alaska Airline

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-23-2008, 09:59 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mccube5's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 722
Default

let's make sure we keep things in perspective before the flaming really begins in this thread.

if i had a dollar for everytime this RAH Alaska rumor comes up i could probably retire early and rich. you hear it every couple weeks, and at this point i would say any regional has a chance of picking up flying if Alaska mgmt decides to outsource it.
mccube5 is offline  
Old 10-23-2008, 02:27 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Beechlover's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: E-190/175/170
Posts: 172
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32
and there lays the problem.... so long as the pilots themselves think like this we will never get anywhere as a profession.
I disagree. It's been proven time and time and time again.., that management in MANY airlines throught the history of comercial aviation does what it wants..., regardless of contract..., regardless of ethics..., most definately regardless of it's pilots opinion, wishes, or desires.., ie we have ZERO..., I'll say it again.., ZERO input as to what contracts, deals, or agreements our respective airline makes. Trust me when I say we, the RAH pilot group are no happier about the midwest deal thatn the midwest pilots. Did that change anything? nope, do you think if our vote actually counted in this, it would've happened at all? It sure didn't save me from getting furoughd so I'll squash that argument right now.

In fact I challenge anybody.., please come up with any example of how pilots at an airline participated in the management's decision making process with regard to contractual decisions. Not talking about greavances or injunctions or work actions.., I'm talking about actual vote counting decisions that it's pilots took part in while employed in a part 121 airline where a decision to enter into a contract involving future aircarrier operations. Short scope and CBA, I'd be willingto bet that that mechanism doesn't exist. We fly from point a to b and that folks is about ALL I can see we have control over. I could be way off base here with my "pilot's" soda straw perspective of the universe but I think I'm pretty close. Just something to consider when we vent misguided gripes at each other.

Now back to the Alaska and RAH discussion ; )
Beechlover is offline  
Old 10-23-2008, 03:18 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
duvie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: WB Bunkie
Posts: 1,246
Default

If Alaska doesn't want their flying outsourced then they need to vote to change their scope. PERIOD. Regionals respond to RFPs, they are businesses and we are their pawns and like Rickair said, we don't have a choice unless we want to lose our jobs.

I will say this once more just in case anybody missed it: the regional race to the bottom was started by mainliners voting away their scope. I don't know their reasons for voting yes, but I know for some airlines management said: we'll give you that 10% pay increase across the board if you raise the scope from 50 seat jets to 76 seaters. I don't think most mainline guys had any idea what their vote meant at the time, but here we are.
duvie is offline  
Old 10-23-2008, 03:27 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Splanky's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: Moving backwards
Posts: 220
Default

Originally Posted by duvie
If Alaska doesn't want their flying outsourced then they need to vote to change their scope. PERIOD. Regionals respond to RFPs, they are businesses and we are their pawns and like Rickair said, we don't have a choice unless we want to lose our jobs.

I will say this once more just in case anybody missed it: the regional race to the bottom was started by mainliners voting away their scope. I don't know their reasons for voting yes, but I know for some airlines management said: we'll give you that 10% pay increase across the board if you raise the scope from 50 seat jets to 76 seaters. I don't think most mainline guys had any idea what their vote meant at the time, but here we are.
The scope clause is a big point we are working on with the Horizon contract and I know it is a big issue for the Alaska pilots as well. Everyone got concerned when Alaska managers got rid of the ramp workers and hired menzies to replace them.
Splanky is offline  
Old 10-23-2008, 03:55 PM
  #45  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

Originally Posted by Mason32
and there lays the problem.... so long as the pilots themselves think like this we will never get anywhere as a profession.
Let me put it to you like this. When both pilot groups first hear about the deals being made in press releases then there's no reason for anyone to sling mud at a group.
ToiletDuck is offline  
Old 10-24-2008, 06:43 AM
  #46  
Line Holder
 
rickkane's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: md-8
Posts: 51
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
Let me put it to you like this. When both pilot groups first hear about the deals being made in press releases then there's no reason for anyone to sling mud at a group.
step up and be accountable for your company's actions and quit making excuses.
rickkane is offline  
Old 10-24-2008, 08:08 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Killer51883's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: E-170
Posts: 842
Default

yeah because 2nd year fo's can hold managment accountable for picking up more flying. i would love to know who you work for if its a company that allows their pilots to vote on the company's transactions.
Killer51883 is offline  
Old 10-24-2008, 09:07 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Reclined
Posts: 2,168
Default

Originally Posted by Beechlover
I disagree. It's been proven time and time and time again.., that management in MANY airlines throught the history of comercial aviation does what it wants..., regardless of contract..., regardless of ethics..., most definately regardless of it's pilots opinion, wishes, or desires.., ie we have ZERO..., I'll say it again.., ZERO input as to what contracts, deals, or agreements our respective airline makes. Trust me when I say we, the RAH pilot group are no happier about the midwest deal thatn the midwest pilots. Did that change anything? nope, do you think if our vote actually counted in this, it would've happened at all? It sure didn't save me from getting furoughd so I'll squash that argument right now.

In fact I challenge anybody.., please come up with any example of how pilots at an airline participated in the management's decision making process with regard to contractual decisions. Not talking about greavances or injunctions or work actions.., I'm talking about actual vote counting decisions that it's pilots took part in while employed in a part 121 airline where a decision to enter into a contract involving future aircarrier operations. Short scope and CBA, I'd be willingto bet that that mechanism doesn't exist. We fly from point a to b and that folks is about ALL I can see we have control over. I could be way off base here with my "pilot's" soda straw perspective of the universe but I think I'm pretty close. Just something to consider when we vent misguided gripes at each other.

Now back to the Alaska and RAH discussion ; )

I'll revise the previous statement:
Originally Posted by Mason32
and there lays the problem.... so long as the pilots themselves think like this we will never get anywhere as a profession..... and contracts, when negotiated, need to include much more comprehensive scope clauses and prohibitions....
Mason32 is offline  
Old 10-24-2008, 04:21 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: B737 CA
Posts: 1,518
Default

Honestly, I think most everyone in the industry realizes regional pilots have very little to do with the deals our companies make. That said, anytime you have a regional pilot gloating over new flying that came at the expense of a major or higher-paid regional with no regard for the larger consequences throughout the industry, it makes everyone else think "that's exactly the kind of person who'd gladly take a paycut for more growth."

Those happy that good things are happening at their company when it results in others' misfortune are best advised to keep their thoughts to themselves lest they be thought a douchebag.
JungleBus is offline  
Old 10-24-2008, 05:23 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 143
Default

Originally Posted by rickkane
step up and be accountable for your company's actions and quit making excuses.
Ok,you first-account for Mesa dismantling CCAir.
frankwasright is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1900Driver
Major
4
09-25-2008 09:12 AM
Splanky
Major
7
09-13-2008 07:26 PM
vagabond
Major
37
09-09-2008 02:19 PM
vagabond
Major
1
08-07-2008 12:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices