Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Cockpit Video

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-2008, 11:48 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JayHub's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: Up Front.
Posts: 253
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777

Any pictures that are obviously below 10,000' should be kept private...
I'm not condoning putting safety at risk........ but I do believe they'll still need to prove that you took the picture, it could have been taken by someone in the jump....Now, if they wanna nail you with that, well there gonna need to prove that you gave them permission, or even knew about it!!!
JayHub is offline  
Old 10-08-2008, 12:03 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Left
Posts: 1,809
Default

Cockpits also are supposed to be sterile environments, free of distractions, and federal regulations prohibit pilots from being engaged in any activity below 10,000 feet that is not conducive to flights


from the article.....is this a reg?
pagey is offline  
Old 10-08-2008, 12:12 PM
  #13  
First Rule of Fight Club
 
BoredwLife's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: My seat smells like cat pee
Posts: 1,536
Default

Originally Posted by pagey
Cockpits also are supposed to be sterile environments, free of distractions, and federal regulations prohibit pilots from being engaged in any activity below 10,000 feet that is not conducive to flights


from the article.....is this a reg?

Yes

§ 121.542 Flight crewmember duties.

(a) No certificate holder shall require, nor may any flight crewmember perform, any duties during a critical phase of flight except those duties required for the safe operation of the aircraft. Duties such as company required calls made for such nonsafety related purposes as ordering galley supplies and confirming passenger connections, announcements made to passengers promoting the air carrier or pointing out sights of interest, and filling out company payroll and related records are not required for the safe operation of the aircraft.
(b) No flight crewmember may engage in, nor may any pilot in command permit, any activity during a critical phase of flight which could distract any flight crewmember from the performance of his or her duties or which could interfere in any way with the proper conduct of those duties. Activities such as eating meals, engaging in nonessential conversations within the cockpit and nonessential communications between the cabin and cockpit crews, and reading publications not related to the proper conduct of the flight are not required for the safe operation of the aircraft.
(c) For the purposes of this section, critical phases of flight includes all ground operations involving taxi, takeoff and landing, and all other flight operations conducted below 10,000 feet, except cruise flight.
BoredwLife is offline  
Old 10-08-2008, 12:27 PM
  #14  
Airport Hobo
 
flyandive's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 844
Default

Some guys at here got some paid time off while they investigated a youtube video of them (you could hear the flight number in the background) taken by a F/A in the jumpseat who recorded them without their knowledge. Lucky for them she confessed.
flyandive is offline  
Old 10-08-2008, 01:28 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Jet Pilot
Posts: 797
Default

Originally Posted by TristarJS30
Aren't there more important issues for the FAA to worry about?
This is an important issue.

I'm glad to see the FAA initiating an investigation into this. The industry used to have a fair amount of respect and dignity associated with it. Now, especially after looking at many of those youtube videos, it is hard to distinguish between a professional and a bunch of high school kids.
Lab Rat is offline  
Old 10-08-2008, 01:47 PM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 87
Default

As I understand in the 91 regs (91.21), a.) it only applies to IFR, and b.) it is at the discretion of PIC. Can someone confirm?
Corny357 is offline  
Old 10-08-2008, 01:47 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cfii2007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,213
Default

Originally Posted by TristarJS30
Aren't there more important issues for the FAA to worry about?
Yeah, like pilots texting while flying...oh...wait, they do that anyway!!
cfii2007 is offline  
Old 10-08-2008, 01:55 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 440
Default

Originally Posted by JayHub
I'm not condoning putting safety at risk........ but I do believe they'll still need to prove that you took the picture, it could have been taken by someone in the jump....Now, if they wanna nail you with that, well there gonna need to prove that you gave them permission, or even knew about it!!!
How could you not know about it? Even in larger cockpits it would be difficult to not see someone videotaping.

With "ignorance is no excuse for the law", the feds will probably question why the prohibition of electronic devices was not briefed prior to departure. Either way, you as the PIC are ultimately responsible for the safety of the flight, thus everything falls on your shoulders. You have to begin thinking like a lawyer in addition to thinking like a captain.
Led Zep is offline  
Old 10-08-2008, 01:58 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 440
Default

Originally Posted by pagey
Cockpits also are supposed to be sterile environments, free of distractions, and federal regulations prohibit pilots from being engaged in any activity below 10,000 feet that is not conducive to flights


from the article.....is this a reg?
At the very least you could see what your company SOP's have to say about use and storage of electronic devices. If your company's SOP's prohibit you from using a camera below 10,000' and you violate that prohibition, then you will probably be subject to a violation by the FAA. Since a carrier's SOP has to be approved by the FAA, if you violate it then you are also violating an FAA approved document.
Led Zep is offline  
Old 10-08-2008, 02:29 PM
  #20  
Permanent Ready Reserve
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Upright and Locked
Posts: 969
Default

Originally Posted by Lab Rat
This is an important issue.
As opposed to upgrading their antique ATC system and creating safe duty regs to fight pilot fatigue? I think you were missing my point.

And please, don't turn this into a FlightInfo thread about those "dang young inexperienced pilots with ipods, hairgel, and no hats."
TristarJS30 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Longbow64
Foreign
8
03-16-2011 08:25 AM
sigtauenus
Military
14
02-12-2011 03:42 AM
alarkyokie
Hangar Talk
5
09-13-2008 11:41 AM
Tech Maven
Hangar Talk
10
08-13-2008 12:03 PM
matty
Cargo
6
08-01-2008 07:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices