Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

latest Pinnacle rumor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-19-2008, 06:59 AM
  #51  
Property of Scheduling
 
higney85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Bus driver
Posts: 2,573
Default

Originally Posted by Truman_Sparks
Look fella's,

I'm not starting any war. My point is, you should watch the tone of your gleeful posts on how great it is that Pinnacle is growing for Delta in ATL, when ASA is shrinking. You may not think that you are taking any flying from ASA, or replacing ASA, but you are - if you get more flying. Hmmmm, ASA parks 12 planes permenantly, and Pinnacle talks about growing by what, 12 or so 900's??? Hey, great for you guys, but think about who is down and out while you are rejoicing. And don't act like you don't, or aren't all excited. You are. (Or some of you are) You are getting growth in ASA's only backyard, which means upgrades, more line, better schedules while ASA just announced downgrades. Line-holders are moving back to reserve, maybe furloughs, etc... So keep the "hey guys, allright! We're getting more planes and growth in ATL" - to a minimum while others are suffering because of it. Next, don't hide behind the whole "we don't decide where we fly, it's management." We all know this. It is in the excitement of your fortunes, while you have no consideration to others misfortunes.

Truman- I hope you don't take this the wrong way, but this is a pinnacle RUMOR thread. The things I have read on here have gone from 100% correct to utterly impossible. I understand ASA has had cutbacks, so has PNCL. We were supposed to have 16 full airframe lines up and running by january for DL- that has been pushed back. On the NWA side we have had flying slashed in MSP (due to compass and mesaba 76'ers coming online) and DTW and MEM have experienced cuts as well. Our september schedules across the board are looking to be just at guarantee (75ish hours) instead of 85-95 hours. We are taking the hits too. The fact that we are going into the winter schedules in addition to the fuel/reorganization/merger mania is just a recipe for the mess. I understand your frustrations for losing flying, but the ASA/PNCL mentality is the same at PNCL with the loss of our flying to mesaba's 900's and Compass Jungle jets. Problem with the mentality is ASA/PNCL/Compass/XJ/RAH/Comair/SKYw don't "own" any of the routes. We are ALL along for the ride. I can only expect this to be the "status quo" until the merger is complete, at which point the "new delta" execs will dangle some RFP's for the remainder of the available 70/76 seaters and try and pull more of the -200's out of the system.
higney85 is offline  
Old 08-19-2008, 07:00 AM
  #52  
Property of Scheduling
 
higney85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Bus driver
Posts: 2,573
Default

Originally Posted by Noseeums
I don't care who you are "that's funny right there"

-Larry the Cableguy
higney85 is offline  
Old 08-19-2008, 07:02 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: crj-200 FO
Posts: 479
Default

I just hope the 200s will atleast get replaced with the 700s. BUT that opens up a whole can of worms that we don't have to open up.
USMC3197 is offline  
Old 08-19-2008, 07:03 AM
  #54  
Line Holder
 
dondk's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: in a seat
Posts: 82
Default

Originally Posted by Truman_Sparks
Look fella's,

I'm not starting any war. My point is, you should watch the tone of your gleeful posts on how great it is that Pinnacle is growing for Delta in ATL, when ASA is shrinking. You may not think that you are taking any flying from ASA, or replacing ASA, but you are - if you get more flying. Hmmmm, ASA parks 12 planes permenantly, and Pinnacle talks about growing by what, 12 or so 900's??? Hey, great for you guys, but think about who is down and out while you are rejoicing. And don't act like you don't, or aren't all excited. You are. (Or some of you are) You are getting growth in ASA's only backyard, which means upgrades, more line, better schedules while ASA just announced downgrades. Line-holders are moving back to reserve, maybe furloughs, etc... So keep the "hey guys, allright! We're getting more planes and growth in ATL" - to a minimum while others are suffering because of it. Next, don't hide behind the whole "we don't decide where we fly, it's management." We all know this. It is in the excitement of your fortunes, while you have no consideration to others misfortunes.
very well said...

the problem with ATL is many junior pilots are heading there, many right out of training. ATL has many senior pilots who have been through 9E flying being distributed amongst the NWA family and can respect the feelings of what is happening with the DCI carriers.

One day the junior guys will learn the respect that the DCI carriers deserve, until then.. just remember that excitement is only because the last job they probably had was High school and they have not matured yet to understand that additional flying for one carrier may mean someone else is losing that flying.

When 9E hires these guys, humility is not a requirement, only a pulse and the ignorance that they are now working for a company that see's it's pilot corp as "hired help" and not professionals.
dondk is offline  
Old 08-19-2008, 07:14 AM
  #55  
Line Holder
 
bornc7d's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Flap Operator
Posts: 73
Default

Originally Posted by Truman_Sparks
Look fella's,

I'm not starting any war. My point is, you should watch the tone of your gleeful posts on how great it is that Pinnacle is growing for Delta in ATL, when ASA is shrinking. You may not think that you are taking any flying from ASA, or replacing ASA, but you are - if you get more flying. Hmmmm, ASA parks 12 planes permenantly, and Pinnacle talks about growing by what, 12 or so 900's??? Hey, great for you guys, but think about who is down and out while you are rejoicing. And don't act like you don't, or aren't all excited. You are. (Or some of you are) You are getting growth in ASA's only backyard, which means upgrades, more line, better schedules while ASA just announced downgrades. Line-holders are moving back to reserve, maybe furloughs, etc... So keep the "hey guys, allright! We're getting more planes and growth in ATL" - to a minimum while others are suffering because of it. Next, don't hide behind the whole "we don't decide where we fly, it's management." We all know this. It is in the excitement of your fortunes, while you have no consideration to others misfortunes.
I understand that it doesnt make you feel good reading other people having a happy thought about their job. (For Pinnacle guys this is rare indeed) But its a public forum and while your entitled to right "hey guys shut up, dont rub it in." you also have the right to STOP READING and go to another thread. Let us have fun celebrating a good rumor, we will undoubtedly be ****ed here in a couple of days when our negotiations turn sour once again. You are going stupid over a couple of guys smiling about a rumor that chances are completely untrue.
bornc7d is offline  
Old 08-19-2008, 07:30 AM
  #56  
Line Holder
 
dondk's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: in a seat
Posts: 82
Default

Originally Posted by bornc7d
I understand that it doesnt make you feel good reading other people having a happy thought about their job. (For Pinnacle guys this is rare indeed) But its a public forum and while your entitled to right "hey guys shut up, dont rub it in." you also have the right to STOP READING and go to another thread. Let us have fun celebrating a good rumor, we will undoubtedly be ****ed here in a couple of days when our negotiations turn sour once again. You are going stupid over a couple of guys smiling about a rumor that chances are completely untrue.
A little more than a year after returned from my furlough from 9E, I had the pleasure of sitting in the jumpseat of a NWA flight commuting to DTW. As we went northbound the NWA CA and FO commented as we passed over all the cities the they use to fly to that 9E was now doing... this was about the same time 9E went from 56 jets to 75 jets.

rumor or no rumor, those jets coming in Jan and next year for 9E is not all "new" flying, it is replacing someones flying. Jeez... is it really that hard to figure out?

Negotiations... I think our original negotiation committee said it best in '05 (when GB was chair), not until there is a change at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue will there be any change to our contract status with the NMB.
dondk is offline  
Old 08-19-2008, 07:44 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Noseeums's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 426
Default

Originally Posted by Truman_Sparks
Look fella's,

I'm not starting any war. My point is, you should watch the tone of your gleeful posts on how great it is that Pinnacle is growing for Delta in ATL, when ASA is shrinking. You may not think that you are taking any flying from ASA, or replacing ASA, but you are - if you get more flying. Hmmmm, ASA parks 12 planes permenantly, and Pinnacle talks about growing by what, 12 or so 900's??? Hey, great for you guys, but think about who is down and out while you are rejoicing. And don't act like you don't, or aren't all excited. You are. (Or some of you are) You are getting growth in ASA's only backyard, which means upgrades, more line, better schedules while ASA just announced downgrades. Line-holders are moving back to reserve, maybe furloughs, etc... So keep the "hey guys, allright! We're getting more planes and growth in ATL" - to a minimum while others are suffering because of it. Next, don't hide behind the whole "we don't decide where we fly, it's management." We all know this. It is in the excitement of your fortunes, while you have no consideration to others misfortunes.
Well so far Pinnacle has done nothing but shrink over the past few months. It looks like almost nobody will be breaking guarantee in MSP and MEM for September. Marketing hours have dropped a couple thousand hours month over month on the NW Airlink side. In a certain light this could be viewed as step 1 to furloughs. But hey! That's a whole 'nother baseless rumor thread!

Oh and by the way. Since we're talking feelings I'm sure Delta mainline pilots feel wonderful watching two DCI regionals squabble over flying they should never of had to begin with.
Noseeums is offline  
Old 08-19-2008, 08:16 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: CRJ
Posts: 2,356
Default

Originally Posted by Truman_Sparks
Look fella's,

I'm not starting any war. My point is, you should watch the tone of your gleeful posts on how great it is that Pinnacle is growing for Delta in ATL, when ASA is shrinking. You may not think that you are taking any flying from ASA, or replacing ASA, but you are - if you get more flying. Hmmmm, ASA parks 12 planes permenantly, and Pinnacle talks about growing by what, 12 or so 900's??? Hey, great for you guys, but think about who is down and out while you are rejoicing. And don't act like you don't, or aren't all excited. You are. (Or some of you are) You are getting growth in ASA's only backyard, which means upgrades, more line, better schedules while ASA just announced downgrades. Line-holders are moving back to reserve, maybe furloughs, etc... So keep the "hey guys, allright! We're getting more planes and growth in ATL" - to a minimum while others are suffering because of it. Next, don't hide behind the whole "we don't decide where we fly, it's management." We all know this. It is in the excitement of your fortunes, while you have no consideration to others misfortunes.

yeah, but just like higney said i posted this under the pinnacle thread. for pinnacle pilots. i could see you being mad about my post if i had gone to an asa post and said what i said, but i didn't.
Airsupport is offline  
Old 08-19-2008, 09:22 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: CA
Posts: 534
Default

You know what...it does suck that pilots get jerked around with their former jobs being shipped off to other companies. Some say it's just business, but it's not. In business, if your job goes to a competitor, you at least have a shot at being hired somewhere else in a similar capacity. In aviation, you start over at the bottom regardless of experience. I think it's our fault for not evolving with the changing times. We should have some system in place to make sure we are unified and that there are negligable benefits for airlines swapping planes/routes to other companies. A minimum pay/national sen. list/ something to unify all pilots across companies moreso than alpa does now. It should include all Airline pilots...maybe all ATP's after recieveing their liscense, they are inducted...Someone with more qual's and passion for it than I can figure this out. Until we are all unifed, we will be split like this. It does suck to be the other company losing flying and hearing about another benefiting from your jobs lost
HIREME is offline  
Old 08-19-2008, 12:31 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Windsor's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Zee Airboos
Posts: 404
Default

Originally Posted by HIREME
You know what...it does suck that pilots get jerked around with their former jobs being shipped off to other companies. Some say it's just business, but it's not. In business, if your job goes to a competitor, you at least have a shot at being hired somewhere else in a similar capacity. In aviation, you start over at the bottom regardless of experience. I think it's our fault for not evolving with the changing times. We should have some system in place to make sure we are unified and that there are negligable benefits for airlines swapping planes/routes to other companies. A minimum pay/national sen. list/ something to unify all pilots across companies moreso than alpa does now. It should include all Airline pilots...maybe all ATP's after recieveing their liscense, they are inducted...Someone with more qual's and passion for it than I can figure this out. Until we are all unifed, we will be split like this. It does suck to be the other company losing flying and hearing about another benefiting from your jobs lost
Amen to that. We DO need some sort of national seniority list. I appreciate ALPA for all that they do, but times have changed. With a national seniority list, companies could not hold pilots hostage to work at a crappy company. Airlines would be forced to maintain a status quo or risk losing pilots to other companies. For example, airline A wants to enforce a 20% paycut. With a national seniority list, all pilots from airline A would have the ability to leave for better airlines and still maintain their seniority at the other airlines. This would force airline A into maintaining a certain QOL, or risk losing their pilots.
A national seniority list would also unify the pilot groups. Lets say Pinnacle is about to go on strike. If they strike, every single plane operated by pilots on this national seniority list is grounded. Every single damn one of them. Imagine working for a union with that kind of power. The days of 5,6,7 year contract negotiations would be over. No longer would you have to be tied to one airline for the rest of your life. Too bad this is just a pipe dream. The infighting between carriers will always exist unless someone does something to change it.
Windsor is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PinnacleFO
Regional
44
08-22-2008 08:04 AM
Sturbmaster
Regional
41
08-18-2008 05:04 AM
Truman_Sparks
Regional
44
08-17-2008 04:11 PM
Airsupport
Regional
62
08-10-2008 08:06 PM
RockBottom
Hiring News
1
03-06-2005 01:25 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices