Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

PDT News and Rumors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-25-2014, 02:30 AM
  #5161  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,011
Default

Originally Posted by N927EV
Absorbed into AA? If only. AA now has 11 feeders flying under the "American eagle" brand. They would more than likely spread the flying across the board. Plus, where do you think 2200 pilots are going to go? Most would have to go to other regionals. And more than likely, they'd end up flying Eagle paint again.
So yeah, envoy folding is kind of a big deal to 2200 of us.
They'll try to spread it across the board but won't be able to completely because only 70% of the 2200 pilots are going to return to the airline industry as a new hire FO making $20,000 per year.

Yeah I know its a big deal to 2200 of you but Envoy is so top heavy there doesn't appear to be any workable solution that allows Envoy to survive in the long run other than maybe merger.
tom11011 is offline  
Old 08-25-2014, 02:41 AM
  #5162  
Line Holder
 
JohnLocke's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 99
Default

Originally Posted by Bzzt
Quote:
I don't believe there is a way out of the situation Envoy is now in.
Merger. It's blatantly obvious- it's a way for them to have their cake and eat it too i.e. keep the pilots get rid of the company

Last edited by JohnLocke; 08-25-2014 at 02:51 AM.
JohnLocke is offline  
Old 08-25-2014, 03:34 AM
  #5163  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 264
Default

Originally Posted by BSOuthisplace
My take after reading the language of this TA.

Pros:

-Flow (especially for those who want to go to a legacy carrier but couldn't because either they didn't have a college degree or didn't fit the BS hiring profile)
- There's some commitment to a future by AAG for PDT pilots
- mods to CBA only happen with jets, we get flow from DOS regardless
Cons:

-Pay scales are cut and paste of PSA large RJ rates
-Pay caps at 12/4 with no grandfathering scales for jets, only for the dash which won't be around in 3-4 years anyway
-healthcare rates jacked up
-vacation goes to 4.2 hrs per day instead of pay for dropped trip, in most cases you will lose a few hours of pay per slot over this.
-sick acrual 3.5 per month instead of 4
-the fact we are doing the opposite of stopping the whipsaw and piling on damage done to the regional industry by the likes of PSA, Endeavor, GoJets, Republic and the likes.
-the chance that AAG will transfer Envoy a/c (145s) to piedmont in the interim
of 175 deliveries to get us started on our CBA mods and to get jets on the operating cert.

That said, I'm fairly confident this TA will pass with over 70% in favor.

I haven't read the language yet. Does it say something about our 145's getting transferred?
bretthull is offline  
Old 08-25-2014, 04:41 AM
  #5164  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BSOuthisplace's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: N/A
Posts: 637
Default

Originally Posted by bretthull
I haven't read the language yet. Does it say something about our 145's getting transferred?
Nope, I can just see that as a likely possibility. AAG is looking for more scare tactics to try and bring Envoy crawling back to the table. What better way to do that then to start transferring equipment off property. I'm telling you, it's coming. Either way I doubt Envoy will furlough because of it.
BSOuthisplace is offline  
Old 08-25-2014, 04:55 AM
  #5165  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,373
Default

Originally Posted by BSOuthisplace
My take after reading the language of this TA.

Pros:

-Flow (especially for those who want to go to a legacy carrier but couldn't because either they didn't have a college degree or didn't fit the BS hiring profile)
- There's some commitment to a future by AAG for PDT pilots
- mods to CBA only happen with jets, we get flow from DOS regardless
Cons:

-Pay scales are cut and paste of PSA large RJ rates
-Pay caps at 12/4 with no grandfathering scales for jets, only for the dash which won't be around in 3-4 years anyway
-healthcare rates jacked up
-vacation goes to 4.2 hrs per day instead of pay for dropped trip, in most cases you will lose a few hours of pay per slot over this.
-sick acrual 3.5 per month instead of 4
-the fact we are doing the opposite of stopping the whipsaw and piling on damage done to the regional industry by the likes of PSA, Endeavor, GoJets, Republic and the likes.
-the chance that AAG will transfer Envoy a/c (145s) to piedmont in the interim
of 175 deliveries to get us started on our CBA mods and to get jets on the operating cert.

That said, I'm fairly confident this TA will pass with over 70% in favor.

I haven't read the language yet. Does it say something about our 145's getting transferred?
Well, looks like PDT will join their brownstreak brothers after all. They will just won't get our "promised" fleet while in BK, they will get our current planes.

Woohoo!!!
PilotJ3 is offline  
Old 08-25-2014, 04:58 AM
  #5166  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,011
Default

Originally Posted by BSOuthisplace
AAG is looking for more scare tactics to try and bring Envoy crawling back to the table.
I highly doubt that.
tom11011 is offline  
Old 08-25-2014, 05:02 AM
  #5167  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 19
Default

Originally Posted by tom11011
I highly doubt that.

I don't. They guaranteed Envoy and PSA airplanes in their respective agreements, but not PDT. I wonder why?
ExpWayVisual is offline  
Old 08-25-2014, 06:20 AM
  #5168  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BSOuthisplace's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: N/A
Posts: 637
Default

Originally Posted by ExpWayVisual
I don't. They guaranteed Envoy and PSA airplanes in their respective agreements, but not PDT. I wonder why?
Exactly. This LOA language makes it sound like AAG doesn't have a plan for Piedmont and that possibly in the distant future we'll get jets. I think this is just masking their real intension to transfer Envoy aircraft. They know our TA has less of a chance of passing if we are voting on blatant aircraft theft and career destruction at Envoy. This is just my opinion but I heard a bunch of rumors of training meetings. We already have a 145 training program ready to go from the old US Air Jets 4Jobs program. I'm telling you it's all ready to go, as soon as the TA passes you'll see them start to execute this plan.
BSOuthisplace is offline  
Old 08-25-2014, 07:24 AM
  #5169  
Happy at PDT
 
Lvlng4Spd's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Position: EMB-145 CA
Posts: 983
Default

Originally Posted by BSOuthisplace
Exactly. This LOA language makes it sound like AAG doesn't have a plan for Piedmont and that possibly in the distant future we'll get jets. I think this is just masking their real intension to transfer Envoy aircraft. They know our TA has less of a chance of passing if we are voting on blatant aircraft theft and career destruction at Envoy. This is just my opinion but I heard a bunch of rumors of training meetings. We already have a 145 training program ready to go from the old US Air Jets 4Jobs program. I'm telling you it's all ready to go, as soon as the TA passes you'll see them start to execute this plan.
Perhaps in the short term. To me, Appendix D reads that, as long as the FA's and MX can reach agreements, that 20 175s are coming with the possibility of 20 more. I believe that's the IF in all this with the 175s. I believe those groups would also reach agreements, as there aren't other alternatives for them. If they can negotiate some kind of flow or preferential hiring program for them at mainline also, that would be excellent.
Lvlng4Spd is offline  
Old 08-25-2014, 07:30 AM
  #5170  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: PNF
Posts: 622
Default

Originally Posted by bretthull
I haven't read the language yet. Does it say something about our 145's getting transferred?
I don't see this happening at all. It is easier just to phase it out at envoy. The cost of adding an additional aircraft type is a lot more than you think... just wishful thinking by the poster.

If you vote yes to this slum TA a couple things will happen:
Pros:
1. You WILL get 40 E175s. I guarantee it.
2. You will actually keep the dash for a bit until another turboprop enters the market. It will more than likely be a smaller fleet though. You are the only turboprop carrier for american. Cost efficency for small markets is the key to success and Parker realizes this.

Cons:
1. You will continue to degredate the industry. Confirming the truth that pilots will step all over each other to get "ahead" when the truth is networking and keeping touch with your co-workers is the key to a major.
2. You will get significant negative feedback from the XJT, envoy, and republic groups. Remember... we WiLL be your co-workers in the future. We don't want to make it a long trip...
3. Your flow can be: metered, loopholed,you name it. Post the language of this and I can find a way around it.

I will personally buy a beers for any PDT crew I come across if you vote no.
yimke is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aviator01
Horizon Air
47
06-24-2008 11:56 AM
triflyier
Cargo
28
05-02-2008 05:26 AM
tankerpuke
Cargo
2
09-23-2007 08:37 AM
Freighter Captain
Hiring News
3
05-16-2005 12:45 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices