Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

PDT News and Rumors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-2014, 04:16 PM
  #4831  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Left
Posts: 1,809
Default

Originally Posted by Bzzt
I'm looking at the pay rates here on APC and assuming they're correct your numbers don't add up. The captain pay you reference is listed in the 70s and eagles 18 year pay is much higher than that. Your FO scale tops out at 41 and eagle's tops at 42. If you're referencing the SAP thing I can't really comment since I don't know how that works but it's worth noting eagle offers premium pay for OT almost every day of the month at current staffing levels.

All regionals are bad, I'm not saying eagle is a great place to work or that PSA is necessarily bad. What I am saying is at least argue with facts.
I think he was referencing PSA vs PDT, not Eagle.
pagey is offline  
Old 05-01-2014, 04:33 PM
  #4832  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 853
Default

Originally Posted by Bzzt
I'm looking at the pay rates here on APC and assuming they're correct your numbers don't add up. The captain pay you reference is listed in the 70s and eagles 18 year pay is much higher than that. Your FO scale tops out at 41 and eagle's tops at 42. If you're referencing the SAP thing I can't really comment since I don't know how that works but it's worth noting eagle offers premium pay for OT almost every day of the month at current staffing levels.

All regionals are bad, I'm not saying eagle is a great place to work or that PSA is necessarily bad. What I am saying is at least argue with facts.
I was talking to setpropellers, I thought he was a pdt pilot. If he's an eagle guy then no the numbers wouldn't add up.
fullflank is offline  
Old 05-01-2014, 04:45 PM
  #4833  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: East coast
Posts: 380
Default

Originally Posted by Setpropeller
Send Eagles 47 CRJ700 to PSA remove the 35 CRJ200 from PSA fleet no negotiation needed since they fly them for free under a blended rate.
Do you even know how a blended rate works? This would increase our hourly rate..not a freebie for management.
Ramprat is offline  
Old 05-02-2014, 05:09 AM
  #4834  
Line Holder
 
Setpropeller's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: Dash 8 Q100-300 CA
Posts: 78
Default Yes!

Yes ramprat (Awesome name), I do know how blended rates work! PSA pilots fly the CRJ 200,700,900 for the same cheap rate as the CRJ200. That's why I said send Eagle 700 to psa since they wont ask for more money to fly bigger airplanes... Give us the Eagle 700s, I guarantee you we wont fly them for Dash 8 rates We wont undercut I brothers the way PSA did to piedmont for the original crj200.
Setpropeller is offline  
Old 05-02-2014, 05:23 AM
  #4835  
Line Holder
 
Setpropeller's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: Dash 8 Q100-300 CA
Posts: 78
Default I only fly RED EYES

Originally Posted by fullflank
What are you smoking dummy? The most jr captain at PSA (09 I think) makes the same as your 18 year captain. Your top fo pay is year 3rd pay at PSA.
Really! are you ready? Your comparing jet rates with dash rates! Really? What we lack in hourly rates we more than make up for on contract language. With that said I guarantee you our 18 year captain makes about the same as your most senior captain. And we fly Turbo propellers...
Setpropeller is offline  
Old 05-02-2014, 05:29 AM
  #4836  
Gets Weekends Off
 
meah's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Position: rj left
Posts: 118
Default

Remember when PSA slammed a huge axe into the backs of pdt and alg pilots? Funny how history does repeat itself. Now they did it to a entire industry of pilots this time. Class act psa, nicely done!
meah is offline  
Old 05-02-2014, 05:50 AM
  #4837  
Gets Weekends Off
 
higgi8f6's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DHC-8
Posts: 150
Default

Why is everybody so hung up on rates? Every contract carrier has pros and cons and to just argue about rates is silly.

But here are some rate facts comparing Piedmont and PSA FO rates. I saw an article several years ago and the discussion is still on APC if you wanna google it about comparing first year and 3rd year FO pay at regionals. It stated Piedmont was one of the highest starting pays but after 3 years was average in comparison to total compensation to all regionals. So I did some math and took the rates on APC and figured min guarantee for 3 years at the APC rate. A PDT FO will make $25,200 his first year and $86,400 at min guarantee for 3 years. A PSA FO will make $21,600 his first year and $85,500 at min guarantee for 3 years. So pretty much all things are equal in regards to FO pay rates.

Now I agree that our CA rates are lower but we do fly a smaller plane and the industry has shown you should get paid more to fly bigger equipment. Every mainline contract is like that.

However I'm content with PDT because we have some other areas where we get good soft money. We have a decent company matching contribution to your 401K. We have a min day guarantee of 4hrs if I go to work. We pay very little for our health insurance. Lineholders and Reserves get cancellation and extension pay. We have a great vacation policy that benefits you if you want to maximize your vacation pay credit or maximize your time off. Is there room for improvement? Of course but so is every regional contract.
higgi8f6 is offline  
Old 05-02-2014, 05:57 AM
  #4838  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Upright
Posts: 605
Default

Originally Posted by higgi8f6
Why is everybody so hung up on rates? Every contract carrier has pros and cons and to just argue about rates is silly.
Because most folks can't see the forest through the trees.
frmrdashtrash is offline  
Old 05-02-2014, 05:58 AM
  #4839  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: East coast
Posts: 380
Default

Originally Posted by Setpropeller
Yes ramprat (Awesome name), I do know how blended rates work! PSA pilots fly the CRJ 200,700,900 for the same cheap rate as the CRJ200
Clearly not. We have separate rates for each type.
Ramprat is offline  
Old 05-02-2014, 06:29 AM
  #4840  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Left
Posts: 1,809
Default

Originally Posted by Setpropeller
Yes ramprat (Awesome name), I do know how blended rates work! PSA pilots fly the CRJ 200,700,900 for the same cheap rate as the CRJ200. That's why I said send Eagle 700 to psa since they wont ask for more money to fly bigger airplanes... Give us the Eagle 700s, I guarantee you we wont fly them for Dash 8 rates We wont undercut I brothers the way PSA did to piedmont for the original crj200.
You clearly do not understand how it works.

That being said if AAG negotiates some deal with Piedmont in the meetings on May 5th or whenever I would then expect AAG to come out with a negative announcement in regards to Envoy that coincides closely with the close date of any PDT vote in order to instill some fear to coax a yes out of Piedmont.

Hopefully since all the hoopla that went on with RAH/XJT/Eagle no votes Piedmont can get something a little better than the **** sandwich Eagle voted no to and the turd burger that we took in the face.
pagey is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aviator01
Horizon Air
47
06-24-2008 11:56 AM
triflyier
Cargo
28
05-02-2008 05:26 AM
tankerpuke
Cargo
2
09-23-2007 08:37 AM
Freighter Captain
Hiring News
3
05-16-2005 12:45 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices