PDT News and Rumors
#4821
Parker and aag
Here's the solution to your staffing issue. Send Eagles 47 CRJ700 to PSA remove the 35 CRJ200 from PSA fleet no negotiation needed since they fly them for free under a blended rate. Place the 60 E175 on Eagle certificate with negotiated new rates and contract improvements. Place PDT pilot group on Eagle/PSA list to help staff their fleet. As the E175 come in remove the Dash from the system. By 2016/17 no more CRJ 200 for PSA and no more Dash 8 no more Piedmont.
#4822
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Left
Posts: 1,809
Here's the solution to your staffing issue. Send Eagles 47 CRJ700 to PSA remove the 35 CRJ200 from PSA fleet no negotiation needed since they fly them for free under a blended rate. Place the 60 E175 on Eagle certificate with negotiated new rates and contract improvements. Place PDT pilot group on Eagle/PSA list to help staff their fleet. As the E175 come in remove the Dash from the system. By 2016/17 no more CRJ 200 for PSA and no more Dash 8 no more Piedmont.
What?
Also our 200s are very new, and make money due to "favorable" lease terms. So outright parking them wouldn't make too much sense. Stranger things have happened though. Perhaps shifting them somewhere else. Or leaving them here and placing eagle's crjs at piedmont and 170s at eagle.
Pure conjecture of course I'm sure we will find out soon what the plan is.
#4823
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Upright
Posts: 605
What?
Also our 200s are very new, and make money due to "favorable" lease terms. So outright parking them wouldn't make too much sense. Stranger things have happened though. Perhaps shifting them somewhere else. Or leaving them here and placing eagle's crjs at piedmont and 170s at eagle.
Pure conjecture of course I'm sure we will find out soon what the plan is.
Also our 200s are very new, and make money due to "favorable" lease terms. So outright parking them wouldn't make too much sense. Stranger things have happened though. Perhaps shifting them somewhere else. Or leaving them here and placing eagle's crjs at piedmont and 170s at eagle.
Pure conjecture of course I'm sure we will find out soon what the plan is.
They have 50 seats and turbofans. They are money sucking vampires.....
#4824
On Reserve
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 19
I doubt you'll see the reduction in 50 seaters come from PSA...more likely Air Wis and since they already said so, Envoy.
What do we think is gonna happen at our meeting with AAG next week?
#4825
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: forever fo
Posts: 2,413
Actually, at a state of the airline like a year ago, Kirby did say the 50 seaters are, in fact, dirt cheap to lease. Makes sense; they are ubiquitous and aren't very fuel efficient. That lower lease cost probably takes some of the sting out of the higher fuel bill.
I doubt you'll see the reduction in 50 seaters come from PSA...more likely Air Wis and since they already said so, Envoy.
What do we think is gonna happen at our meeting with AAG next week?
I doubt you'll see the reduction in 50 seaters come from PSA...more likely Air Wis and since they already said so, Envoy.
What do we think is gonna happen at our meeting with AAG next week?
#4826
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 853
Here's the solution to your staffing issue. Send Eagles 47 CRJ700 to PSA remove the 35 CRJ200 from PSA fleet no negotiation needed since they fly them for free under a blended rate. Place the 60 E175 on Eagle certificate with negotiated new rates and contract improvements. Place PDT pilot group on Eagle/PSA list to help staff their fleet. As the E175 come in remove the Dash from the system. By 2016/17 no more CRJ 200 for PSA and no more Dash 8 no more Piedmont.
#4829
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,648
All regionals are bad, I'm not saying eagle is a great place to work or that PSA is necessarily bad. What I am saying is at least argue with facts.
#4830
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post