PDT News and Rumors
#4181
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 259
I remember this coming up when we voted on Q400 rates a few gears ago, but I remember being told that the company can place larger equipment on property whenever they want. We would fly them at current rates for X amount of months and then have so long to agree on new rates. Since our rates are currently so low, what would keep them from doing this with larger RJ's? Put them on property, get me to fly them at the -300 rate ($65), while they make bank for a few months then negotiate rates with the union.
#4182
Banned
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
I remember this coming up when we voted on Q400 rates a few gears ago, but I remember being told that the company can place larger equipment on property whenever they want. We would fly them at current rates for X amount of months and then have so long to agree on new rates. Since our rates are currently so low, what would keep them from doing this with larger RJ's? Put them on property, get me to fly them at the -300 rate ($65), while they make bank for a few months then negotiate rates with the union.
Unless your contract stipulates a specific maximum negotiation period and then arbitration, try years.........many years. If you do have an arbitration clause, the arbitrator will have an open door to award the company a match of the most competitive rates out there.
I'd spend a lot if time reviewing Pinnacles contract in that case. But hey...........shiny new RJ's !!!!
#4184
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: CL-65 / Gear Wrangler
Posts: 321
You need to be drug tested if you think PDT is getting larger RJs.
USAir has no vested interest in keeping PDT around long term.
And why would USAir/AA want to finance an order of lets say 30 aircraft (which would shrink PDT another 30%), at $30mil+ each ($900mil at list costs) when they could get someone else to finance them.
Plus on the East side operation, they are scoped out of any large RJs.
Only the west side has open scope, and PDT isn't moving out to PHX for flight ops. If you believe that, go tan in the desert for the afternoon, it'll burn some sense into you.
USAir has no vested interest in keeping PDT around long term.
And why would USAir/AA want to finance an order of lets say 30 aircraft (which would shrink PDT another 30%), at $30mil+ each ($900mil at list costs) when they could get someone else to finance them.
Plus on the East side operation, they are scoped out of any large RJs.
Only the west side has open scope, and PDT isn't moving out to PHX for flight ops. If you believe that, go tan in the desert for the afternoon, it'll burn some sense into you.
#4185
You need to be drug tested if you think PDT is getting larger RJs.
USAir has no vested interest in keeping PDT around long term.
And why would USAir/AA want to finance an order of lets say 30 aircraft (which would shrink PDT another 30%), at $30mil+ each ($900mil at list costs) when they could get someone else to finance them.
Plus on the East side operation, they are scoped out of any large RJs.
Only the west side has open scope, and PDT isn't moving out to PHX for flight ops. If you believe that, go tan in the desert for the afternoon, it'll burn some sense into you.
USAir has no vested interest in keeping PDT around long term.
And why would USAir/AA want to finance an order of lets say 30 aircraft (which would shrink PDT another 30%), at $30mil+ each ($900mil at list costs) when they could get someone else to finance them.
Plus on the East side operation, they are scoped out of any large RJs.
Only the west side has open scope, and PDT isn't moving out to PHX for flight ops. If you believe that, go tan in the desert for the afternoon, it'll burn some sense into you.
#4187
Piedmonster, you speak in absolutes like you know what's going to happen here. I don't know what your motive is but if it's to get people to think again about working here you can stop because the job has already been done. Why would you work at Piedmont? That's a hard question to answer right now. Congrats Piedmonster, you made the right choice by leaving for greener pastures. Is that what you want to hear?
The truth is probably only a few people in the merger integration planning team for AA/US and Parker, Kirby and his team have even a remote idea of the future of Piedmont, PSA and Eagle, and even this is still up for negotiation and change.
Speaking from my own experiences working in another major airline's flight operations department, fleet and future route network plans change monthly, weekly, and even daily. One week you're planning massive expansion with a new fleet type, the next you're parking 10 aircraft and furloughing. In this business everything is subject to change at a moments notice and sometimes what seems like the least likely ends up happening. The pasture that seems green today could be brown tomorrow and vise versa. Take PNCL/Colgan as an example.
#4188
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: Ask scheduling
Posts: 384
We can't post anything about PDT without Piedmonster reminding us of his high hopes for a PDT demise, but we are in the same place PSA was in when they got their new fleet. Bombardier does not support the 100's anymore. I do find it interesting that overnight the PSA/PDT pilots were given a contract to review after being so far apart for so long and yet our FA's still don't have a contract. I was willing to put money down that they would have a TA within a month of the pilots getting one. Not so much.
#4189
I do find it interesting that overnight the PSA/PDT pilots were given a contract to review after being so far apart for so long and yet our FA's still don't have a contract. I was willing to put money down that they would have a TA within a month of the pilots getting one. Not so much.
#4190
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: CL-65 / Gear Wrangler
Posts: 321
Nor do I want to see PDT disappear. A lot of friends have made a home there.
As I've said over and over, my commentary either boils down to:
A) Don't believe the carrot they are dangling, it's not true
B) having hope at PDT is dangerous to your career, just don't do it.
C) don't go to work at PDT, but if you do, go in with your eyes open and have an end game
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post