All UAX carriers will be denying jumpseat to UAL mainline pilots on 8/31/08
#51
All they have to do is tell Captains to go to the gate before push to see if there are any jumpseaters, and rectify it that way.
This is going too far in my opinion, and will only strain the mainline/regional relationships further.
This is going too far in my opinion, and will only strain the mainline/regional relationships further.
#52
Please tell me this is BS....
I hope this is some sort of joke. What the hell is this industry comming to when a few pilots, try to abuse their influence (anonomously I might ad), to start a jumpseat war? Good luck, to all the UAL/UAX folks affected by this. Use your heads, keep your cool, do the right thing, and run an honest show, despite management's ineptitude.
The sad part is that the solution to all of this seems simple.....Don't use the damn software until it's fixed (if ever). UAL needs to issue a memo, an e-mail or whatever to the Gate Agents. Tell them to simply use a piece of paper and a pen and make a jumpseat list. It ain't that hard. This is how we used to handle all of our non-revs and jumpseaters years ago, at America West, and it worked just fine. The solution to every problem is not neccesarily a freakin' software upgrade. I'm sure the Gate Agents are pretty sick of being in the middle of this ****ing match too.
The sad part is that the solution to all of this seems simple.....Don't use the damn software until it's fixed (if ever). UAL needs to issue a memo, an e-mail or whatever to the Gate Agents. Tell them to simply use a piece of paper and a pen and make a jumpseat list. It ain't that hard. This is how we used to handle all of our non-revs and jumpseaters years ago, at America West, and it worked just fine. The solution to every problem is not neccesarily a freakin' software upgrade. I'm sure the Gate Agents are pretty sick of being in the middle of this ****ing match too.
#53
I can tell you that the letter was placed on our pilot(not company) website at RAH. The post was made by one of our Jumpseat coordinators. In fact, the coordinators from all three certificates put there names to it.
#54
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 787
What the hell is this industry coming to when pilots can't get seats on their own company's aircraft? What the hell is this industry coming to when I was left by an AA mainline flight that had 15 seats available (against the will of the captain) because AA restricts offline listings (when my airline doesn't). How is it fair that unlimited AA system pilots can ride on my plane but I can't ride on their plane?
This isn't pilots vs. pilots, this is UAX pilots standing up to UAL mgmt for something the UAL mainline pilots are incapable or unwilling to take care of themselves. Have some honor if you're a UAL mainline pilot and call your union rep.
This isn't pilots vs. pilots, this is UAX pilots standing up to UAL mgmt for something the UAL mainline pilots are incapable or unwilling to take care of themselves. Have some honor if you're a UAL mainline pilot and call your union rep.
#55
Short of the C/D gates at IAD one of us has to go print the release anyway. Going to the gate desk isn't that hard.
I'm totally opposed to this on many levels. The computer system needs to be fixed but this isn't the way to accomplish it.
I'm totally opposed to this on many levels. The computer system needs to be fixed but this isn't the way to accomplish it.
#56
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: CRJ 200/700 FO
Posts: 28
Why was the system changed a month or so ago in the first place? What was so wrong with the old system (UAX carrier, then UAL, then other UAX?)
#57
Line Holder
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 31
The jumpseat coordinators have been trying to correct this problem over a year...
UAL management agrees to correct the software with UAL MEC approval...
UAL MEC refuses to honor the agreement and will not approve the correction...
UAL management agrees to correct the software with UAL MEC approval...
UAL MEC refuses to honor the agreement and will not approve the correction...
#58
Remember, these folks have been asking nicely for several years. The UAX pilots who are pushing for this have obviously ALREADY been denied jumpseats on their own airplanes, numerous times.
I don't like it either, but it sure looks to me like UA started it by attempting to punish certain regioanls by putting their priority below mainline and below OTHER regionals on their own airplanes.
If UA pilots wanted priority access to RJ jumpseats, they should have kept the RJ's in their scope and the pilots on their list...you can't have it both ways.
I don't like it either, but it sure looks to me like UA started it by attempting to punish certain regioanls by putting their priority below mainline and below OTHER regionals on their own airplanes.
If UA pilots wanted priority access to RJ jumpseats, they should have kept the RJ's in their scope and the pilots on their list...you can't have it both ways.
I could care less who started what. This is absolutely the worst way to go about it. No regional should go against it's codeshare and no action should be taken against anyone on the pilot's behalf without it being put to vote. People that support this need to sit down and think of what complications it could cause down the road. What if that guy's sitting across from you during an interview one day? Right now this is the regional trying to retaliate against UALs management by using their pilots. You have any idea what their pilots could do to us? It goes both ways and they definitely have the bigger stick.
Worst idea ever and if I get denied a jumpseat because of something a select few did without my pilot groups vote then I'd flip a lid.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post