Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
All UAX carriers will be denying jumpseat to UAL mainline pilots on 8/31/08 >

All UAX carriers will be denying jumpseat to UAL mainline pilots on 8/31/08

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

All UAX carriers will be denying jumpseat to UAL mainline pilots on 8/31/08

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-01-2008, 05:43 AM
  #131  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,611
Default

Originally Posted by Lambourne
Walk to work if you have to, but you won't be doing it on my airplane as of 7/1.
Now why on earth would you start a jumpseat war now, before things get a chance to be worked out?

And why would you beat up an RJ captain who takes a delay to get ballast, allowing a jumpseater onboard? Its not like crews wanted the FAA to keep jacking around with weights, causing W&B issues.

Preemption was a Cold War tactic and rash emotional responses just like yours will cause this thing to get really out of hand and really, really fast.
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 07-01-2008, 05:58 AM
  #132  
Line Holder
 
rocketman99's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: Q CA
Posts: 75
Default

Originally Posted by Lambourne
I am glad this letter was written. Many UAL pilots don't understand what a bunch of iceholes we have flying our paint. This will be an eye opener for many and hopefully will allow a full combat campaign against the UAX carriers. Fight is on!
Ahh, you sound like that same ******* UA CA who chewed me out two years ago for saying hello and not requesting a seat on your pretty aircraft when I was NON-REVVING (not jumpseating). Thanks for playing. Go back and count what's left of your big bucks.
rocketman99 is offline  
Old 07-01-2008, 06:16 AM
  #133  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 564
Default

this is why the industry is the way it is, GROW UP FOLKS
buffalopilot is offline  
Old 07-01-2008, 06:23 AM
  #134  
*********
 
paxhauler85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,068
Default

Originally Posted by Lambourne
I am glad this letter was written. Many UAL pilots don't understand what a bunch of iceholes we have flying our paint. This will be an eye opener for many and hopefully will allow a full combat campaign against the UAX carriers. Fight is on!
Iceholes? Full combat campaign?

Calm down. Let's figure this out in a mature way. As a 767 captain, you should know how to solve problems in this manner.
paxhauler85 is offline  
Old 07-01-2008, 06:46 AM
  #135  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 31
Default

This has been a subtle, yet blatant attempt by UALs MEC to gain priority of UAX's jumpseats. Now that they are caught in the act, it UAX's pilots fault, UAL management, or IT problem... The MEC had the priorities change with management's approval and now, they won't change them back.
Thinking man is offline  
Old 07-01-2008, 06:53 AM
  #136  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 744 CA
Posts: 4,772
Default

Cuts both ways slick!!!

Originally Posted by Lambourne
I'm sorry but this is about the priority code changing? Why doesn't it mention that in the letter?

Walk to work if you have to, but you won't be doing it on my airplane as of 7/1.
HercDriver130 is offline  
Old 07-01-2008, 07:37 AM
  #137  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
Default

Originally Posted by Terrain Terrain
Nice post, you seem like a stand up guy. I think the problem here is it has nothing to do with UAL management, your MEC is the one that changed the priority code and refuses to change it back.
Thanks Terrain. The way I read the letter, it sounds like the appeals have been to UAL management, but I have no inside info on this at all, so it is possible its the UAL MEC.

I think we may be talking about two different issues. The priority codes were changed a short time ago to give priority to TSA and GO Jets over other UAX carriers, as they give our pilots priority over other UAX carriers. I know the UAL J/S coordinator would like the priority on ALL UAX flights to be 1) Own Airline 2) UAL 3) Other UAX 4) Other Airlines. I have never heard from our J/S coordinator that we were trying to get jumpseat priority over UAX on your own airline.

The letter that was circulated sounds like a different issue, and one that has been around for few years. Conspiracy theories aside, I don't know of any active attempt by the UAL MEC to try to get the jumpseat over UAX on their own carriers. Doesn't mean it doesn't exist... I just haven't heard about it. When I leave the jet, the last thing I want to think/talk about is the airline industry.

Last edited by gettinbumped; 07-01-2008 at 08:00 AM.
gettinbumped is offline  
Old 07-01-2008, 07:41 AM
  #138  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
Default

Originally Posted by rememberaloha
Agree completely....BUT.....the agents handling UAX at ORD are UNITED MAINLINE agents. DEN/LAX/SFO, yes, they are UAX, but ORD is MAINLINE.
Didn't know that it was mainline agents in ORD. In that case, I can state with complete certainty that you should be able to get an OMC card and see the Captain without question, regardless of how many OMC's have shown up. THAT is the UAL policy, and if it isn't being followed, please contact your jumpseat coordinator with the flight, date, gate, and agents last name (it should be on their tag). I would suggest keeping the conversation professional, but asking them to look at the HOW OMC in Apollo if they don't agree with the policy. We have had agents fired for not following this specific provision of the policy intentionally. As a Captain, I don't want some agent deciding who gets on the jumpseat. We worked long and hard to have that decision brought back to the Captain.

Its upsetting to me that your J/S coordinators have been unable to convince UAL to force our agents to use our own policy, and I hope that our J/S coordinator sees this as egregious behavior. It is an erosion of Captains authority, pure and simple.

I can certainly see where this issue would irritate our Express Brothers and Sisters. I remember this type of issue at Horizon awhile back, as I commuted to SEA from PDX. I got denied a few times and always left without any questions. I do remember thinking to myself that it was a strange tactic to bite the hand of the 50 guys that actually USED Horizon and were actively trying to get the horrific policy changed at the time when the other 9550 pilots at UAL could care less about Horizon. The policy got changed in that case NOT because we were denied the jumpseat, but because it was a bad policy. I suspect the same would be true here. This post was an education to me. I didn't know this was an issue, and will contact my J/S coordinator to see why it isn't being addressed. NOT because I'm being threatened, but because its wrong. Once again.... take me on the J/S or not. I could care less. In the interim, I would suggest making UAL pilots aware of the issue when you have them on the seat, because we had no idea this was going on. Might I suggest, however, that when you do mention it, you catch more bees with honey.

Last edited by gettinbumped; 07-01-2008 at 07:51 AM.
gettinbumped is offline  
Old 07-01-2008, 07:53 AM
  #139  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A320 Cap
Posts: 2,282
Default

Originally Posted by dojetdriver
That was a well written post. The only thing I have is the contract being put up for rebid. UAL already did that back in 2003. The two most expensive contractors were eliminated. One was fairly quick, the other came later. One of the contractors that won the bid is ALREADY one of the cheapest. You can't undercut MESA on a cost basis. The other is pretty cheap as well. It'd pretty hard to match their costs based on the size of operation they currently have.
Express Jet needs some help, and FAST. Great lakes could probably use some work. Lynx might be out of a job soon. It may take a little time, but I never cease to be amazed at how good UAL is at screwing people.
gettinbumped is offline  
Old 07-01-2008, 07:53 AM
  #140  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 781
Default

This is one of the stupidest threads I've read here in a while. Pilots Vs. Pilots for an empty seat.
BURflyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sr. Barco
Regional
89
09-15-2013 07:22 PM
RockBottom
Major
17
08-04-2007 06:25 AM
Sr. Barco
Major
34
07-31-2007 01:01 PM
nw320driver
Major
15
11-17-2006 07:45 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices