Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
XJT management refused to placate CAL >

XJT management refused to placate CAL

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

XJT management refused to placate CAL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-26-2008, 10:44 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
blastoff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 1,531
Default

Originally Posted by Ottopilot
They are not CAL and CAL does what it wants (to a certain point- I know about the CPA).
While we are not CAL, CAL still acts as we are them. They have vigorously fought to maintain their "Most Favored Nation" clause with us, preventing us from larger CPA's with other carriers. They want us to cut flying yet remain almost exclusively a CAL carrier.
blastoff is offline  
Old 05-26-2008, 10:56 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ottopilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,576
Default

Yea, but in a way they are. They own (lease) all 274 jets and they "created" Expressjet from nothing, so maybe they feel entitled? Who knows? It sucks anyway you look at it. I'm glad I left Express in time, but I worry about my friends there.
Ottopilot is offline  
Old 05-26-2008, 11:05 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
blastoff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 1,531
Default

Originally Posted by Ottopilot
Yea, but in a way they are. They own (lease) all 274 jets and they "created" Expressjet from nothing, so maybe they feel entitled? Who knows? It sucks anyway you look at it. I'm glad I left Express in time, but I worry about my friends there.
I don't know if "created" is the right word. "Spun off" is probably the best description...but if this was their plan all along, what was the point of spinning off an "independent company." If they wanted to control what Expressjet does outside of CAL, they should have just kept COEX in-house.
blastoff is offline  
Old 05-26-2008, 11:12 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Left, Right, Left
Posts: 143
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
The XJT CEO is going to do what he believes is best for the shareholders. Looking back, you may make a case that his decisions in were not correct in respect to shareholder value. But hindsight is 20/20. I don't think that anything transpired that wasn't just business decisions made at the time with the information given at the time.
I think it was nothing more than a personality clash. Ream started his own airline once Kellner gave him to finger. His decision will ultimately lead to either bankruptcy or ExpressJet being dismantled via SKYW.
meritflyer is offline  
Old 05-26-2008, 11:15 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 585
Default

And Eagle is out for sale, though probably not many bids.

CAL and AMR have much in common. They make the regional suffer and take the losses, be it scheduling, cancellations, or low wages so the mainline won't have to.

CAL, AMR, UAL, and so on want their cake and to eat it to. All in fun, clean, bloody business as usual.
jedinein is offline  
Old 05-26-2008, 11:24 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
OKLATEX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: B767 FO
Posts: 423
Default

The reason the ExpressJet was created was to pay off debt for CAL. Originally it was to pay for airport expansion/fleet expansion. As it was further divested, it was used to fund the retirements. The IPO, as far as I know and can remember, never reached what they thought. The stock for the most parts has always been below what they expected, but did give them some money. I think part of the problem was that it was after 911, which Ream admitted, it was horrible timing. But, I also think it never had a large value as it was then, a paper company. They owned nothing. Not a towbar. That may have changed since I have been gone, 3 years.

Granted they have done some incredible things with that company and has done much better than I ever thought it would be severed from CAL. I give Ream credit for that. Branded, while using the EMBs was not bright given what happend to Independence, at least they used the CPA to prop them up and try things. The Charter is great because they can pass the cost along. But, bottom line Ream came from Air Mike, Continental Micronesia, and got a division that was a mini CAL. That is why the airline runs well, and the CPA was a cash cow for them. That is why it made so much money.

I have mixed emotions about Ream. Express has done better than I ever thought it would, but he is also the guy that stood there in the hotel in CLE for me, and said, if you don't like or want to take part in this, your can leave, and that is fine. The name ExpressJet came because they forgot to name the company and realized that it needed a name and ExpressJet was already on the airplane from CAL's branding of the RJ.

ExpressJet, COEX to me, is a great place to work. I loved my time, 6.5 years. We had a good contract, and a great crew force, and a good product. A lot of that comes from being formed by CAL and sold by CAL.

CAL is doing what they need to do to stay competitive in the industry. CAL, in my opinion is the best US airline. And they started looking at alternatives very early on. CHQ but a bid in, and COEX laid off office folks and did some other cost cutting things in 03 or 04. It was Ream who led us all Jet, then not too long later they contracted with CommutAir to bring the 1900s back, while our 1900s were flying in Miami.

I wish all the luck to the COEX guys. If being part of Skywest is in the cards for them, I hope Ream leads them in such a way that as many Express people can keep working.

Last edited by OKLATEX; 05-26-2008 at 11:34 AM. Reason: spelling
OKLATEX is offline  
Old 05-26-2008, 11:25 AM
  #17  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by duvie
That is where I may not totally agree with you. Jim Ream's decisions weren't very prudent. I don't think they were bad or irresponsible given the information he had but, hindsight or not, he knew he was taking a big risk by playing hardball with CAL.
Sure, he knew it had risk. But that risk and associated reward is what he thought he had to do to increase shareholder value. That is all I'm saying. Plus I'm sure that if the price of a barrel of oil was at $133, he would NOT have taken that risk especially considering that the Branded operation would be close to break even if the price of oil would have stayed the same as it was in June 2006. Like I said, hindsight is 20/20.

Originally Posted by Ottopilot
Yea, but in a way they are. They own (lease) all 274 jets and they "created" Expressjet from nothing, so maybe they feel entitled? Who knows? It sucks anyway you look at it. I'm glad I left Express in time, but I worry about my friends there.
They are in a way because of the CPA CAL wrote before XJT was spun off. Because that CPA gives CAL all the cards. It requires XJT to have to renegotiate rates EVERY year, it requires XJT to get permission from CAL to acquire another airline or to be acquired by any other airline, it allows CAL to release 25% of the aircraft, it allows CAL to cancel the CPA with 12 months notice, it prohibits XJT from operating any of their aircraft in CAL hubs, it requires XJT to give CAL the terms and conditions of any other CPA XJT has with another partner if its more favorable or limit it to only 10 aircraft, it requires XJT to give preference to CAL operations over their own operations.

XJT has been under the thumb of CAL all along with all those clauses put into the CPA by CAL.

Originally Posted by meritflyer
I think it was nothing more than a personality clash. Ream started his own airline once Kellner gave him to finger. His decision will ultimately lead to either bankruptcy or ExpressJet being dismantled via SKYW.
I don't think any of this would have happened if they would have come to an agreement before the whole release of the 69 aircraft. I think that JR was holding his ground on rates because he felt that was what was best for shareholder value. Shareholders want to see increased revenue and profits, not reduced. Maybe if JR knew that CAL would release 69 aircraft, he would have caved in on the rates instead. Of course, that is just my opinion.
Nevets is offline  
Old 05-26-2008, 11:28 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
OKLATEX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: B767 FO
Posts: 423
Default

By the way, it was always the intention of Express to be its own airline,to do its own flying from day one. It was an option for them anyway. I sat and listened to that too in that hotel in CLE. All the CAL management guys were part of this deal. They all got shares of ExpressJet.

None of us know what CEOs do/think. We know how they impact our lives. I am on my 3rd airline. They have all are basically the same. I don't think they are going to wake up and think how they can screw us all, but they have a job to do, and their is a cost of making a choice. Sometimes we pay the price for their choice.

Last edited by OKLATEX; 05-26-2008 at 11:36 AM. Reason: content
OKLATEX is offline  
Old 05-26-2008, 11:37 AM
  #19  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by OKLATEX
They owned nothing. Not a towbar. That may have changed since I have been gone, 3 years.
XJT has had many assets for the last 3 years. XJT has over $550 million in assets.

Originally Posted by OKLATEX
Branded, while using the EMBs was not bright give what happend to Independence, atleast they used the CPA to prop them up and try things.
Indy Air is not a fair comparison to the Branded operation. Two separate and distinct business models.

Originally Posted by OKLATEX
We had a good contract, and a great crew force, and a good product. A lot of that comes from being formed by CAL and sold by CAL.
And a lot of the heart ache now is because of CAL and how they wrote that CPA before the spin off.

Originally Posted by OKLATEX
CAL is doing what they need to do to stay competitive in the industry. CAL, in my opinion is the best US airline. And they started looking at alternatives very early on. CHQ but a bid in, and COEX laid off office folks and did some other cost cutting things in 03 or 04. It was Ream who led us all Jet, then not too long later they contracted with CommutAir to bring the 1900s back, while our 1900s were flying in Miami.
CAL is but a shadow of itself from when Bethune ran it. LK is in the middle of witting his book, "From First to Worst" if he keeps this up.

Originally Posted by OKLATEX
By the way, it was always the intention of Express to be its own airline, from day one. I sat and listened to that too in that hotel in CLE. All the CAL management guys were part of this deal.
The problem with that is that now that XJT is its own airline, it cannot operate like one because of what CAL wrote in the CPA before XJT was spun off.
Nevets is offline  
Old 05-26-2008, 12:35 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
OKLATEX's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: B767 FO
Posts: 423
Default

As I mentioned before I am impressed what the company has done, and some of that stuff was started when I was there, but certainly has changed since I left.

It is and isn't. Independence had the foresight to acquire mainline airplanes that could spread out the operating costs. But bottom line, the 50 seat Jet is not a money maker. It didn't work for Independence, it didn't work for Ozark II/Great Plains. I know ExpressJet has done well in the west, and from what I understand, it is a good product. But that is not an airliner that makes money in a stand alone basis, unless you are doing charters as ExpressJet has proven.

If you are running CAL, wouldn't you put the restrictions on ExpressJet. That was smart business so they wouldn't have to compete against them.

I agree Kellner is no Gordo, but the industry is a mess currently. Kellner was brought in during the turn around to straighten out the finances/accounting of CAL. He was a banker. They taught him to be an airline guy. CAL is doing well for itself currently because they cut the fat 10 years ago. They did then what everyone did after 911. He maybe putting the screws to the company and the contractors, but this industry is a mess, and has been since 911, and with oil, it is only getting worse, for pax and cargo. My company is turning the screws. This is worse than it was after 911. Again, I would cut the guy some slack. They were smart enought not to merge with UAL when he said that he wouldn't be left out of the merger game. It really is a well run airline.

Ream mentioned day one that we maybe our own airline. The point I was trying to make is that ExpressJet/COEX was sold to pay debt off for CAL. Pure and simple. They set it up so they wouldn't have to compete against it. Smart business. I was also there in that CLE hotel when he told us that this was not a place to stay forever. I have to agree with Ottopilot on that. The truth is that ExpressJet is a contractor, and contractors lose contracts and have to compete with other contractors. That sucks because COEX/ExpressJet is a great company. But again, it was a division that was sold to accomplish something for its parent. It sucks, and again, the Express guys are a great group, and I really wish them all the best.

Last edited by OKLATEX; 05-26-2008 at 02:52 PM. Reason: content
OKLATEX is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
160
04-28-2008 06:45 PM
molson247
Regional
11
04-12-2008 12:34 AM
grant123
Major
33
02-11-2008 07:47 AM
Hawkeye
Regional
2
01-19-2006 03:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices