Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Icing procedures VS NASA >

Icing procedures VS NASA

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Icing procedures VS NASA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-2008, 07:28 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 173
Default Icing procedures VS NASA

Hi,

I'm studying up for a possible interview, and have been watching a NASA video on icing for Corp and Regional pilots/aircraft. Their recommendations seem to conflict with traditional thought on when and how many/much to cycle the boots. They recommend cycling often and that modern boots do not create ice bridging. Since I don't have this experience, can I get some real life wisdom here.

Thanks,

577nitro-

Last edited by 577nitro; 04-17-2008 at 07:33 AM. Reason: Spelling
577nitro is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 07:36 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SmoothOnTop's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: retired
Posts: 645
Default

The AFM should have the procedure in section 5 for the particular aircraft...
SmoothOnTop is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 07:47 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 737 Left
Posts: 828
Default

Are you talking about ice bridging?

It's kind of a defunct procedure. First sign of ice blow the boots.
DMEarc is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 10:37 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flyguyniner11's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 765
Default

someone once told me that the whole ice bridging myth came from an old movie and it just kinda snowballed from there. We are told to turn the boots on at +5 and visible moisture and leave em on for 15 min after leaving the conditions
flyguyniner11 is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 10:42 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Clue32's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 873
Default

I've been flying a King Air for 4 years and have watched that NASA video many, many times. Beech / Raytheon / Hawker, what ever it is they call themselves this year, recommends waiting for 1/2 inch of ice to build up before you cycle the boots. If you cycle the boots four times (get two inches of build up) then the recommendation is to immediately exit the icing environment. Here is the trick. How do you determine the difference between 1/2 and 1/4 and 1 inch of ice? You guestimate based on things attached to the leading edge of the wing (stall stips, recognition light guards, etc). From what I've been told, many modern T-Props have boots that continuously cycle when you turn them on. Mine don't; they inflate and then deflate until you hit the switch again. I will say that if you hit the boots with too little ice on them, not all will pop off. In my experience, it is best to wait for a build up.

Take that NASA video to heart when it comes to tail plane icing. If you make a configuration change and things start going very bad, undo what you just did. That means keeping your hand on the flap selector until they are fully down and the aircraft is reacting normally.

One last thing. Be careful of rapid decents and level-offs with ice on the wing. Something crazy happened to me about two weeks ago, I think it was an ice induced accelerated stall because I was doing 145knots leveling off from a 2000fpm decent in a King Air, in ICM, 4000 feet above the ground, during the seconds between when I asked for the de-ice boots to be popped and the other pilot hit the switch. Scared the daylights out of me.

Happy Flying
Clue32 is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 01:52 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 251
Default

I'm on the brasilia, and I've been in some very nice icing situations. I have seen bridging a couple of times (luckily we weren't in icing for a long period of time), but it was brought on by cycling the boots too early in clear icing conditions. Not to say it happens all of the time, but I'm sure all of the stars need to be aligned for it to happen. Like Clue said, you gotta watch the tailplane icing close (just because the leading edges don't have much, doesn't mean the tail is clear too). I usually base the boot actuation off of the current accumulation. I've never have issues with airspeed decay, maybe the occasional prop imbalance (due to the stellar prop deice system *sarcasm*) but it's worked well for me. The FAA's done more tests than I have so take this info with a grain of salt.
EMB120IP is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 01:56 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,814
Default

What are these boots you speak of I'd better study up for the Brasilia - teach me and I will listen LoL
ExperimentalAB is offline  
Old 04-17-2008, 04:35 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 251
Default

They look exactly like the moon boots that Napoleon Dynamite wears in his movie. You velcro them around the back, great traction on the bottom, with a shnazzy glimmer in the mid morning winter sun!
EMB120IP is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Beernuts
Fractional
22
09-08-2018 06:05 PM
detpilot
Hangar Talk
0
02-28-2008 09:12 PM
DamonMeyer
Hangar Talk
0
10-22-2007 07:53 AM
TOGA
Money Talk
1
09-16-2007 09:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices