Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

The honest future

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2008, 07:52 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 744 CA
Posts: 4,772
Default

nobody knows REALLY what the future holds....any guess past next week for any company is just that.... a guess.
HercDriver130 is offline  
Old 03-24-2008, 07:57 AM
  #12  
Self Employed.
 
SkyHigh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Corporate Pilot
Posts: 7,119
Default No one knows

Originally Posted by HercDriver130
nobody knows REALLY what the future holds....any guess past next week for any company is just that.... a guess.
No one knows what the real estate market will do tomorrow but when you examine a graph over time it is easy to see the overall trend.

As with aviation next week will be a surprise. Ten years into the future is easier to guess.

SkyHigh
SkyHigh is offline  
Old 03-24-2008, 08:28 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 564
Default

SKYHIGH

I cant say i really agree with that. If you look at carriers in other countries, the training that the pilots get fro day 1 is geared toward airlines. They dont do it like we do here with the time building. They hirfe pilot with 0 hours and put them in an Airbus etc. Their pay is OK. So i dont agree that multi crew rating ets will ruin the industry. Its a quick fix for lack of pilots. When the mins go up again, that rating will be useless
buffalopilot is offline  
Old 03-24-2008, 08:32 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,425
Default

Buffalo, ask yourself "why is there a lack of pilots". It's because the career and pay are nothing compared to what they used to be. When I got my commercial DAL pilots still made $300+/hr, and the regionals had 50 seaters max. It's nothing like it was.
fosters is offline  
Old 03-24-2008, 08:52 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 564
Default

I also think that cheap labor, increase in regional flying at lower wages etc was a solution that major airline management thought would work. But they are now realizing that you get what you pay for. RJs arent profitable, even the 170's and that we need less flights and use bigger airplanes. Its happening already. In Buffalo, 3 months ago it was mostly RJs, now is all main,ine overnighting in Buffalo, 757's A320 etc. The RJ was the immedaite fix to 911 but it did not cure the disease! IMO
buffalopilot is offline  
Old 03-24-2008, 08:59 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
groovinaviator's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: CL65 Captain
Posts: 484
Default

Originally Posted by buffalopilot
...In Buffalo, 3 months ago it was mostly RJs, now is all mainline overnighting in Buffalo, 757's A320 etc...
I think we still do at least 2 CRJ200's there a night. I do so many freakin BUF overnights... be there Tuesday and Thursday night this week! Not a bad overnight for us... one of my favorites. Great place to be in the summer!


PM me if you wanna grab a beer.
groovinaviator is offline  
Old 03-24-2008, 09:10 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 564
Default

yeah there still are some RJ but USair 757 United 737 etc. Beer is great. I MAY TAKE YOU UP ON IT.
buffalopilot is offline  
Old 03-24-2008, 10:29 AM
  #18  
Line Holder
 
tcasra's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 25
Default Are you serious?

Originally Posted by groovinaviator
I could even see them hiring foreigners when the wage gets too low for even the bottom of the barrel guys (MESA and TSA types) to accept.

I hope for the best though. I love my job (when the door is closed).
"Bottom of the barrel guys (Mesa and TSA types)?" Who are you to judge others for choosing an airline that does not "meet your standards"! You are assuming that because someone chooses Mesa, TSA or Pinnacle that they are less experienced and qualified than others. There have been plenty of pilots at these carriers that haved moved on to Majors, Legacy carriers and Fractionals. It is my assumption that many go to places like these to get the quick upgrade so they are able to move on and progress their careers. And if you're wondering, I don't work for above. QOL is pretty good where I am, but sometimes I wonder if QOL while sitting right seat for 3+ years is worth it. I don't plan to stay here forever...do you?
tcasra is offline  
Old 03-24-2008, 11:45 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
groovinaviator's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: CL65 Captain
Posts: 484
Default

Originally Posted by tcasra
...You are assuming that because someone chooses Mesa, TSA or Pinnacle...

I never said Pinnacle... are they bottom of the barrel? Interesting.I have quite a few friends from college at TSA and although I don't agree with where they went to work I am by no means better than them. Some have a reason they need to be there, but let's face it most of us (not all) entry level pilots are young and single and could go wherever we wanted. Anyway, My point is that the less money someone is willing to work for the less money we will all make. My company formerly had bases in the midwest, but now we do not and I get paid much less money than I would have because a second rate company that doesn't pay their pilots crap undercut us. I suppose those pay cuts which we had to take to stay afloat helped inch us along in the race to the bottom... Glad we are not winning that race.

How does going to a company like MESA, TSA, and apparently Pinnacle (among others I'm sure) help anyone but yourself. I suppose that in the end everyone is only looking out for #1 anyway.

Same old story... That is part of (dis)honest future.
This has been argued so many times before. There is nothing new from either side to be said.

Didn't mean to sound arrogant... I by no means think i am better than anyone else. I however do think I did my part (through research) to get a job that wasn't screwing over other entry level pilots... although it could be argued I am screwing the guys at the majors... the argument could go on forever.


And no... I don't plan on being at AWAC forever, but i do no if there is another down turn in hiring I will have made the right decision. By the way... don't get caught up on upgrade times. They can (and do) change overnight.
groovinaviator is offline  
Old 03-24-2008, 11:53 AM
  #20  
Self Employed.
 
SkyHigh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Corporate Pilot
Posts: 7,119
Default Multi-Crew

Originally Posted by buffalopilot
SKYHIGH

I cant say i really agree with that. If you look at carriers in other countries, the training that the pilots get fro day 1 is geared toward airlines. They dont do it like we do here with the time building. They hirfe pilot with 0 hours and put them in an Airbus etc. Their pay is OK. So i dont agree that multi crew rating ets will ruin the industry. Its a quick fix for lack of pilots. When the mins go up again, that rating will be useless
High training costs are the driving force behind the MCL. In 3 years we could be paying $10 a gallon for avgas. It is highly possible that in the near future it could cost 140K for a commercial MEL license. Eventually private training programs will drop off.

Rather than to raise wages airlines will constitute their own European style cadet programs and hire high school kids as indentured servants. As with the age 65 rule, the MCL is just another way for companies to continue the supply of cheap pilots.

Skyhigh
SkyHigh is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sharksrock
Hangar Talk
8
01-27-2008 11:49 AM
grant123
Major
12
09-04-2007 10:23 AM
maximaman
Regional
31
09-03-2007 06:38 AM
grasshopper
Major
12
09-02-2007 06:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices