135 checkride needed?
#21
That is ridiculous. It sounds like you have connections for some good experience. If the company needs an SIC for the Navajo (didn't know any operation had that requirement), and it can lead to a PIC position when you have met the mins, why not stay there? You're probably based at home and chances are good you'd make more than a 1st year regional FO.
I don't know if I'd recommend anybody get newly involved in the airline business right now. Besides, RJs aren't all they're cracked up to be.
I don't know if I'd recommend anybody get newly involved in the airline business right now. Besides, RJs aren't all they're cracked up to be.
#22
Crazy business!
Last edited by Jetjock65; 03-13-2008 at 12:29 PM.
#23
That is ridiculous. It sounds like you have connections for some good experience. If the company needs an SIC for the Navajo (didn't know any operation had that requirement), and it can lead to a PIC position when you have met the mins, why not stay there? You're probably based at home and chances are good you'd make more than a 1st year regional FO.
I don't know if I'd recommend anybody get newly involved in the airline business right now. Besides, RJs aren't all they're cracked up to be.
I don't know if I'd recommend anybody get newly involved in the airline business right now. Besides, RJs aren't all they're cracked up to be.
#24
Hey PIT Dude,
Yes log the time, and yes talk about it in the interview. As said before, be sure you can discuss technical basics about the good ol' Navajo. If the leg was 91, you can certainly log part 91 PIC if you are the sole manipulator of the controls (you have your multi cert, right?). This should be fine for most regional airlines.
For applying to a Major airline your turbine PIC must be "by the book", and it is a different set of rules and conditions from what you are operating under. For a regional, you have proven basic competency, character, and personality to have someone "give" you the shot to fly a somewhat bigger airplane around, and to be willing to spend time with you up front. This actually will mean something to most regional recruiters.
Yes log the time, and yes talk about it in the interview. As said before, be sure you can discuss technical basics about the good ol' Navajo. If the leg was 91, you can certainly log part 91 PIC if you are the sole manipulator of the controls (you have your multi cert, right?). This should be fine for most regional airlines.
For applying to a Major airline your turbine PIC must be "by the book", and it is a different set of rules and conditions from what you are operating under. For a regional, you have proven basic competency, character, and personality to have someone "give" you the shot to fly a somewhat bigger airplane around, and to be willing to spend time with you up front. This actually will mean something to most regional recruiters.
#25
*I am not an airline guy* but I wouldnt sweat how your logging it when regionals are hiring pilots with 300 hours of 172 time and 15 hours in a duchess. You will be fine I am sure.
I did the same things years and years ago when I started out, and I logged the 91 legs as PIC because I was rated in the plane and did all of the company training, although I did not require a checkride. for the 135 legs, after talking to our cheif pilot and POI, we decided that I should log it as total time, but no pic or sic. I was required to be in the aircaft for insurance but the FAA considered it a single pilot operation. Again, go to 20 different FSDO's and you will get 20 different interpretations on what to do. It never was questioned and it never prevented me from getting any other job. And like someone else said earlier, if you are going to claim that you are a PIC, then you better know that airplane STONE COLD for your interview.
I did the same things years and years ago when I started out, and I logged the 91 legs as PIC because I was rated in the plane and did all of the company training, although I did not require a checkride. for the 135 legs, after talking to our cheif pilot and POI, we decided that I should log it as total time, but no pic or sic. I was required to be in the aircaft for insurance but the FAA considered it a single pilot operation. Again, go to 20 different FSDO's and you will get 20 different interpretations on what to do. It never was questioned and it never prevented me from getting any other job. And like someone else said earlier, if you are going to claim that you are a PIC, then you better know that airplane STONE COLD for your interview.
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: 737 Right
Posts: 955
Of course he'd make more than a 1st yr Regional FO but would he make more than a 3rd yr capt.? First year pay in the 121 buisness sucks every place including the Majors 1st yr pay. On top of all that turbine time means everything these days and your not going to get that flying a navajo.
When I wrote that post, here's what I was thinking, but didn't say: Air Ambulance seems to me like a flying job with a good amount of stability. It sounds like the kind of experience that could lead to other part 135 or 91 opportunities, and may provide for good live-in-base quality of life and better pay.
But if the original poster is ready to stomach the world of part 121 flying, and will accept nothing else as a long-term goal, so be it. Better get in while they're still hiring.
#27
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: 737 Right
Posts: 955
2) US carriers are in a transitional period. Legacies are in merger talks and two regionals have gone out of business so far in 2008.
3)You said it... oil prices. This is a big deal for two reasons. First, it will constrict the general state of the US economy even further. This, of course, means a reduction of demand for air travel. Second, airlines may respond to high fuel prices by increasing fares and increasing load factors. To accomplish this, a reduction of capacity (and pilot jobs) will likely be necessary.
The party is over. If it's your sole desire to work for an airline this decade, I'd get on board now. But be prepared to wait out a long career as an FO, take pay concessions, get furloughed, survive a merger, or some combination of these. If you're a career changer, give it some serious thought.
But that's just my opinion, and you know what they say about opinions.
#29
You make good points.
When I wrote that post, here's what I was thinking, but didn't say: Air Ambulance seems to me like a flying job with a good amount of stability. It sounds like the kind of experience that could lead to other part 135 or 91 opportunities, and may provide for good live-in-base quality of life and better pay.
But if the original poster is ready to stomach the world of part 121 flying, and will accept nothing else as a long-term goal, so be it. Better get in while they're still hiring.
When I wrote that post, here's what I was thinking, but didn't say: Air Ambulance seems to me like a flying job with a good amount of stability. It sounds like the kind of experience that could lead to other part 135 or 91 opportunities, and may provide for good live-in-base quality of life and better pay.
But if the original poster is ready to stomach the world of part 121 flying, and will accept nothing else as a long-term goal, so be it. Better get in while they're still hiring.
Also the only reason I say anything about low-time guys being hired is because I know first hand how hard the transition is especially in ground school. I hope these guys that are getting hired with these kinds of hours are sharp, both with the books and their flying, this is a whole different type of training than what you have been used to while getting your basic ratings, take this from a guy who started flying a high performance swept wing jet with less than 400TT. it can and will be tough so be prepared, you do not want a failed 121 training note in your PRIA paperwork. Best of luck to ya and if anyone with low time should be hired you should at least your experience includes some type of flying besides in a 172 and a semenhole. Like I said In the begining this post and my post on this board are not to be an a$$h*!@, just looking out for you guys that seem to wana get into 121 flying. Im only trying to look out for you and the Industry. Imagine what kind of contracts and pay they would have to give us if everyone waited to go to the airline with 1000+ time.
#30
*I am not an airline guy* but I wouldnt sweat how your logging it when regionals are hiring pilots with 300 hours of 172 time and 15 hours in a duchess. You will be fine I am sure.
I did the same things years and years ago when I started out, and I logged the 91 legs as PIC because I was rated in the plane and did all of the company training, although I did not require a checkride. for the 135 legs, after talking to our cheif pilot and POI, we decided that I should log it as total time, but no pic or sic. I was required to be in the aircaft for insurance but the FAA considered it a single pilot operation. Again, go to 20 different FSDO's and you will get 20 different interpretations on what to do. It never was questioned and it never prevented me from getting any other job. And like someone else said earlier, if you are going to claim that you are a PIC, then you better know that airplane STONE COLD for your interview.
I did the same things years and years ago when I started out, and I logged the 91 legs as PIC because I was rated in the plane and did all of the company training, although I did not require a checkride. for the 135 legs, after talking to our cheif pilot and POI, we decided that I should log it as total time, but no pic or sic. I was required to be in the aircaft for insurance but the FAA considered it a single pilot operation. Again, go to 20 different FSDO's and you will get 20 different interpretations on what to do. It never was questioned and it never prevented me from getting any other job. And like someone else said earlier, if you are going to claim that you are a PIC, then you better know that airplane STONE COLD for your interview.
I've heard a few different things about this also, but you weren't given any problems for the 135 legs being logged as just total time? Not as PIC or SIC?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post