Skywest?
#31
Do yourself a favor and skip the CRJ type rating. Save yourself A LOT of money. Your better off studying the Jepps and AIM in and out.
I do fly for SKYW and can tell you from experience that they (hiring) care about instrument skills and knowledge as well as stick and rudder skills way more than equipment. A guy who can describe the prop on a Dutchess in and out will get hired over a right seat Citation guy who cant describe the engines EVERY TIME!
Yes, you'll probably never do the "turn time twist talk etc" of C172 instrument flying but it is important to everyone you fly with that you know that stuff. You WILL be a$$-n-elbows and the right seat is not on the job training. When you go to training in SLC no one will teach you instruments...your expected to have a basic skill set and I think most who wash out knew some book stuff to get thru the interview but did not have the instrument skill SET.
And finally..I didn't mean to imply the above mentioned schools were bad. It's just very frustrating to see and fly with people who did not bust their hides to get this job because it shows in everything they do. Poor radio technique, preflight prep, look and act sloppy and are willing to work for peanuts because they don't understand or appreciate their "worth". It drags them and us down.
I do fly for SKYW and can tell you from experience that they (hiring) care about instrument skills and knowledge as well as stick and rudder skills way more than equipment. A guy who can describe the prop on a Dutchess in and out will get hired over a right seat Citation guy who cant describe the engines EVERY TIME!
Yes, you'll probably never do the "turn time twist talk etc" of C172 instrument flying but it is important to everyone you fly with that you know that stuff. You WILL be a$$-n-elbows and the right seat is not on the job training. When you go to training in SLC no one will teach you instruments...your expected to have a basic skill set and I think most who wash out knew some book stuff to get thru the interview but did not have the instrument skill SET.
And finally..I didn't mean to imply the above mentioned schools were bad. It's just very frustrating to see and fly with people who did not bust their hides to get this job because it shows in everything they do. Poor radio technique, preflight prep, look and act sloppy and are willing to work for peanuts because they don't understand or appreciate their "worth". It drags them and us down.
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 584
Yes, I'm working on the instrument rating right now and am doing well. My instructor said I've picked it up very quickly and I can do IFR basics pretty much by second nature now. Approaches, holds, etc require attention but I can hold an ILS and find an intersection without much stress. Studying for the written is some of the most boring reading I've ever done. I practice all the time on flight sim too. Sometimes flying is all I can think about
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 584
Mushroom, speaking or Jepp charts, you know where I could find some to study? Naturally, I use the much cheaper NACA books. I have the Jepp IFR/Comm manual and I think it have explanations for the Jepps, but do you know of anymore resources?? Thanks!
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: RJ Captain
Posts: 1,183
As a Captain I've flown with probably at least 100 different FOs over the last several years and only two of them bought hours via Gulfstream or a similiar program. Both of these guys were older/career changers. I would not recommend buying time like that if SkyWest is a goal cause it doesn't seem to open the door here. Additionally, they absolutely will not budge on any of the minimums.
Buying a CRJ type rating would be a serious waste of money. Even if you had Bill Gates money I'd still tell you not to do it.
As far as Jepps go, start using them now. Thats all we use, and during the interview you'll be asked multiple questions concerning all the different charts. I probably spent a good 10 minutes on the Jepps alone during my interview.
This is an excellant time in your career to get the basics down really good. Don't take any shortcuts, and try to learn as much as you can. We actually had a guy several years ago get fired during EMB upgrade training because he didn't know how to turn the lights on at an uncontrolled airport.
Buying a CRJ type rating would be a serious waste of money. Even if you had Bill Gates money I'd still tell you not to do it.
As far as Jepps go, start using them now. Thats all we use, and during the interview you'll be asked multiple questions concerning all the different charts. I probably spent a good 10 minutes on the Jepps alone during my interview.
This is an excellant time in your career to get the basics down really good. Don't take any shortcuts, and try to learn as much as you can. We actually had a guy several years ago get fired during EMB upgrade training because he didn't know how to turn the lights on at an uncontrolled airport.
#35
Originally Posted by MikeB525
rickair, you're a great help once again. One last final verdict: how would you rate the CRJ-200 (add the -700 if you like) on a scale of 1 to 10 on each of the following:
-Overall Performance
-Handling/manouverability
-cockpit displays and systems
-ergonomics/comfort
-"fun to fly" factor
General question I've been wondering. I flew on a CRJ once and it seemed no louder than any other jetliner. So why do I always see RJ pilots wearing the big David Clarke noise reduction headsets? I hear it's a requirement, but why??
Thanks guys
-Overall Performance
-Handling/manouverability
-cockpit displays and systems
-ergonomics/comfort
-"fun to fly" factor
General question I've been wondering. I flew on a CRJ once and it seemed no louder than any other jetliner. So why do I always see RJ pilots wearing the big David Clarke noise reduction headsets? I hear it's a requirement, but why??
Thanks guys
HOWEVER: When you get to fly the 200 empty or nearly so, it's a freakin rocket...
Handling: 7 (10 = military tactical) (700 =7)
Displays/Systems: 8 (700 =9)
Ergo: 4 (Getting in and out of the seat's a *****, the lumbar sucks, but actually really good other than that) (700 = 7)
Fun: 7 (10 = military tactical) (700 = 8)
I use a TELEX 750 ($$$). Some folks keep their David Clarks so they don't have to spend the money I guess. Some older 200's had big fat windshield wipers which made a lot of slipstream noise, but you still don't need to cover your ears in my opinion.
Last edited by rickair7777; 02-07-2006 at 08:27 PM.
#36
Originally Posted by MikeB525
Mushroom, speaking or Jepp charts, you know where I could find some to study? Naturally, I use the much cheaper NACA books. I have the Jepp IFR/Comm manual and I think it have explanations for the Jepps, but do you know of anymore resources?? Thanks!
#38
Originally Posted by MikeB525
How expensive is it to subsribe to Jepp anyway? I hear it's like thousands per year for a nation-wide set. Can you get them by individual states?
More $$$ than NOS, but it's something you need for the airlines. I don't know of any airlines that use NOS, though I heard some turbo-prop commuter does. Or maybe it was a 135 op.
#39
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Position: Alaska 737 FO
Posts: 61
Do yourself a favor and skip the CRJ type rating. Save yourself A LOT of money. Your better off studying the Jepps and AIM in and out.
Know the systems of the airplane you're currently flying. If a procedure has you flip a switch, feather a prop, do something a certain way, know why you're doing it- not just because the checklist says so. Know Jepps, FARs, and IFR procedures.
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 7ER B...whatever that means.
Posts: 3,985
Originally Posted by rickair7777
You can subscibe, or buy a regional pack for approx $30. The regional pack gets thrown away and you buy a new one every 60 days. I think the regional subsciption is $300+ per year and you get bi-monthy updates in the mail that you have to insert into your binder (just like the airlines).
More $$$ than NOS, but it's something you need for the airlines. I don't know of any airlines that use NOS, though I heard some turbo-prop commuter does. Or maybe it was a 135 op.
More $$$ than NOS, but it's something you need for the airlines. I don't know of any airlines that use NOS, though I heard some turbo-prop commuter does. Or maybe it was a 135 op.
PS To those who think instructing is wasted time: since students are always concerned about money, you'll have to learn both in and out regardless of what you use so all your bases are covered
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post