Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Skywest?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2006, 09:57 AM
  #11  
Need More Flight Time!
 
Flying Ninja's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Flight Simulator X
Posts: 400
Default

Hi Rickair777,

Can you explain what you mean by "work rules" for us newbies? I've heard this term thrown around but I have no idea what it entails.

Thank you.
Flying Ninja is offline  
Old 02-05-2006, 10:45 AM
  #12  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,404
Default

Originally Posted by Flying Ninja
Hi Rickair777,

Can you explain what you mean by "work rules" for us newbies? I've heard this term thrown around but I have no idea what it entails.

Thank you.
Work rules determine how the pay scale gets applied, and how much time off you have. My examples are for the regional level...

Guarantee: The minimum number of flight yours you will get paid every month (or bid period), regardless of how much you fly. Reserve pilots often live on this (which is what I'm doing right now). Varies between 65-80 hours/month. My goal is to either fly as little as possible or as much as possible, but not in between. If I fly 20 hours but get paid for 75, that's not bad! Once you go over the guarantee, you get paid for actual flight time. I don't like to fly 73 and get paid 75 if I could have flown 20 hours and STILL got paid 75. But if I can fly 95 hours, that's a nice chunk of change (20 hours) that I get ABOVE the guarantee.

Min days off are usually 8-12 per month, reserve pilots sometimes have less.

Duty Rig: Pays you a minimum flight pay per hour of duty. 1 for 3 or 1 for 4 is typical. This is important if your company schedules long breaks in your flying day, or if you have a lot of WX or congestion delays at your base. If you don't have a duty rig, that's bad, because not only do you not get paid, but the company has no incentive to not waste your time. You don't want to have a 13 hour day with two :35 minutes legs and only get paid 1:10 for 13 hours of duty...Note: The guarantee still protects you for your monthly min.

Trip Rig: Min pay for the entire time you're away from base. Typically some value less than the duty rig, if you even have one. If you fly to some exotic destination, and have a 30 hour layover you would get paid something while sitting there. I don't think many regionals have this.

Per Diem: Cost of living allowance paid for each hour you are on duty or away from base. If you sit ready reserve for 8 hours at the airport, you get 8 hours per diem. If you go on a 4 day trip, you get paid 4x24 = 56 hours per diem (depending what time you actually depart and return. $1-$2/hour is typical rate. Buying airport food will eat up your per diem.

Block Pay: Do get paid flight time for block-to-block (gate-to-gate) or just for SCHEDULED flying time? BIG difference. Congestion, WX, de-icing can leave you on the ground for HOURS only to fly a :28 minute leg. You want to get paid actual block-to-block.

Commuter Clause: If you plan to commute to work, you need to know if your contract has any provisions that allow you to miss work if get stuck trying to commute through no fault of your own. Some companies don't like commuters. Eagle used to not even allow new hires to jumpseat or non-rev! If your company allows no-questions-asked "personal days", you could use these if you get stuck commuting.

Training pay: Most regionals will either pay you during training OR provide a hotel. It's about a wash either way. If you get nothing during training, I'd suggest you don't take that job.

So, the big things to look for in employer work rules are guarantee and duty rig. Some airlines don't use a calendar month as a bid period, so make sure you convert to compare. Mesa'a 70 hour guarantee doesn't compare well with the typical industry average of 75...until you realize that mesa is on a 28 day bid period...convert that to monthly and mesa gets 76 hours/month.

I think duty rig is the most critical, it encourages the company to minimize your sit time while on duty, so your duty days are shorter (or at least you get PAID to sit on your @ss all afternoon in the COS airport). Also what people don't realize is that if the company can leave you on duty, but only fly you a few hours, you could go six days without hitting 30 hours. Then you only get minimum days off. If the company has incentive to fly you @ss off when you're on duty, you'll hit your weekly 30 limit in just a few days and then get more days off.

If you have an interview or job offer, try to get educated by a pilot who works there about what their rules are and how they are applied.
Mesa has 8 days off (ten for line holders) no duty rig, no trip rig, and pays on average, not actual block times. You get the picture...

Last edited by rickair7777; 02-05-2006 at 10:54 AM.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-05-2006, 01:47 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
de727ups's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: UPS 757/767 Capt ONT
Posts: 4,357
Default

"but if I were to get hired by SKW"

MikeB525, I saw at another thread you were hot for RAA. Skywest doesn't hire low time guys from program schools like ExpressJet and ASA does. I've talked to a pilot interviewer there and they don't look highly on multi timebuilding programs, either. You might want to think about getting your CFI tickets and building some quality time if you want to work at Skywest. Plus, make friends with someone on their list.
de727ups is offline  
Old 02-05-2006, 02:00 PM
  #14  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,404
Default

Originally Posted by de727ups
"but if I were to get hired by SKW"

MikeB525, I saw at another thread you were hot for RAA. Skywest doesn't hire low time guys from program schools like ExpressJet and ASA does. I've talked to a pilot interviewer there and they don't look highly on multi timebuilding programs, either. You might want to think about getting your CFI tickets and building some quality time if you want to work at Skywest. Plus, make friends with someone on their list.
I've got a friend at ASA. She thinks that Skywest will phase out ASA's low-time pilot hiring programs. Possible exception might be the DCA, since Delta apparently requires its regional partners to accept some DCA product.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-05-2006, 08:06 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
de727ups's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: UPS 757/767 Capt ONT
Posts: 4,357
Default

"Skywest will phase out ASA's low-time pilot hiring programs"

That would be a big hit to FSA's direct track program.

"Possible exception might be the DCA"

I'm not fan of DCA cause of their marketing practices. But I think guys come out of there with 1100 total and a couple hundred multi, on average, since they have to instruct for a period of time before they are considered "graduated" from the program.
de727ups is offline  
Old 02-05-2006, 08:35 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 584
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
, If you work at SKW you can eventually upgrade into the 700 and never have to fly the 200.

]

Wait.....the CRJ-200 and the CRJ-700 are bid as separate aircraft? Are they not common type ratings?? Seems odd the have two aircraft of the same series in your fleet and bid them as seperate aircraft. They have identical flight decks and probably the same systems (just different speeds, weights, etc.). Can you clarify??
MikeB525 is offline  
Old 02-05-2006, 08:53 PM
  #17  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,404
Default

Originally Posted by MikeB525
Wait.....the CRJ-200 and the CRJ-700 are bid as separate aircraft? Are they not common type ratings?? Seems odd the have two aircraft of the same series in your fleet and bid them as seperate aircraft. They have identical flight decks and probably the same systems (just different speeds, weights, etc.). Can you clarify??

They are the same type. My company (which shall remain anonymous to protect the guilty) operates 200's and 700's interchangeably as far as pilots are concerned. The systems are almost identical, HOWEVER aerodynamic design of the wings and landing is another story...way different. The 200 lands like an F-16, the 700 lands like a real airliner. You have to watch yourself if you've been flying one exclusively, then switch to the other. SkyWest choses to keep the pilots segregated, upgrade from the 200 is brief groundschool and a checkout in the airplane (maybe a sim session or two also?). They still get 90% of the benefit of the common type rating.

Some 75/76 operators keep them separate, others co-mingle (united IIRC).
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-05-2006, 09:10 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: DHC-6-300 EMB 120 CRJ
Posts: 275
Default turbine time

When they start to hire agian, will it be for the CRJ or the EMB? Also, with turbine time, would you be more likely to get the CRJ? Thanks.....
otter is offline  
Old 02-05-2006, 09:19 PM
  #19  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,404
Default

Originally Posted by otter
When they start to hire agian, will it be for the CRJ or the EMB? Also, with turbine time, would you be more likely to get the CRJ? Thanks.....
Last year they seemed to hire pretty much only CRJ drivers into the CRJ. This is because there's a glut of Indy Air guys who are rated on the aircraft, plus a bunch of Mesa types who want out (mesa lost 100+ to SKW last summer). Everybody else pretty much went to the Brasilia. If you have some quality glass turbojet time, they might give you the RJ, I would think...
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-06-2006, 12:20 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 584
Default

So if a SKW CRJ line holder has gone through checkouts for both aircraft, do you mean that they may do -200 one month, then a -700 line the next? Or is it ALWAYS one or the other? In any case, since you've flown both what do you like better? Could you say anything more specific about the landing characteristics? I've never flown an F-16 so I couldn't compare
MikeB525 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JustAMushroom
Regional
65
07-16-2006 11:44 PM
dontsurf
Regional
28
07-13-2006 05:11 AM
ShamH85
Regional
14
10-21-2005 10:01 AM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 04:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices