Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
When Delta/NWA merge, which base closes first? >

When Delta/NWA merge, which base closes first?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines
View Poll Results: When Delta/NWA merge, which base closses first.
Salt Lake City
6
4.92%
Memphis
66
54.10%
Cincinnati
37
30.33%
Detroit
9
7.38%
Seattle
4
3.28%
Voters: 122. You may not vote on this poll

When Delta/NWA merge, which base closes first?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-18-2008, 01:20 PM
  #11  
N/a
 
naley70b's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 198
Default

I personally can't understand why airlines don't place more value on SLC. Its a decent sized city and growing fast, its closer to skiing than any other major airport, its got one of the best on time performance records and deals with snow better than any other airport.

And on top of that the people around SLC are just so friendly. Delta is growing it, but it doesn't seem like it gets the attention it deserves IMHO.
naley70b is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 04:21 PM
  #12  
No Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 362
Default

Originally Posted by Airsupport
i can tell you right now pinnacle is getting more routes and doing more flying for nwa every month. we now have a mem-cos route. we are also starting a mem-crw route. memphis is going no where. plenty of room to grow, little to no taxi time, and a very good location.
Things are good in MEM right now. But remember, in a merger all bets are off.

MSP, DTW, CVG -- all are located close together. Something has to give.

ATL, MEM. Same thing. No way Delta maintains both as hubs.

So....

DTW & ATL are locks to stay post-merger.

MSP - even money. Minnesota politicians could hold up the merger unless they get assurances of a hub.

CVG - shaky

MEM - odd man out, too small, few international routes, WAY too close to ATL SuperHub. MEM closes.
norskman2 is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 04:28 PM
  #13  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

Originally Posted by jdt30
Cal can merge if NWA doesn't merge it just costs more than 100 dollars.
CAL can't merge without NWAs approval. The only way around that is if NWA itself merges. I doubt NWA would want them to merge unless with them.
ToiletDuck is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 04:56 PM
  #14  
Underboob King
 
Superpilot92's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Guppy Commander
Posts: 4,412
Default

None. Why close them just to let some LLC come in and snatch up flying when both carriers have full flights? Also there is NO way the DOJ would allow AA to merge with anyone. AA has already done its merging.
Superpilot92 is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 05:21 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: FO
Posts: 3,044
Default

Originally Posted by naley70b
I personally can't understand why airlines don't place more value on SLC. Its a decent sized city and growing fast, its closer to skiing than any other major airport, its got one of the best on time performance records and deals with snow better than any other airport.

And on top of that the people around SLC are just so friendly. Delta is growing it, but it doesn't seem like it gets the attention it deserves IMHO.
The problem with SLC, is that more and more emphasis is being put on international routes and SLC doesn't have the greatest location for that. SLC is good for the ski traffic, relatively short flight to ASE, EGE, and the like. LAX is a better choice to grow for an international presence on the west coast
BlueMoon is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 05:45 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 845
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
CAL can't merge without NWAs approval. The only way around that is if NWA itself merges. I doubt NWA would want them to merge unless with them.
We can merge or buy, the problem is we have to pay a large amount of money for that golden share. Cal would be a lot better off if the mergers did not happen and we were allowed to grow on our own at our own pace. The problem is that right now we are not large enough to compete against a combined DAL/NWA.
jdt30 is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 06:29 PM
  #17  
La Familia Delta
 
ghilis101's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B-717 FO / C-17 AC
Posts: 2,467
Default

Originally Posted by naley70b
I personally can't understand why airlines don't place more value on SLC. Its a decent sized city and growing fast, its closer to skiing than any other major airport, its got one of the best on time performance records and deals with snow better than any other airport.

And on top of that the people around SLC are just so friendly. Delta is growing it, but it doesn't seem like it gets the attention it deserves IMHO.
In airline terms, SLC is the MEM of the west, minus beal street.
ghilis101 is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 06:31 PM
  #18  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

I hate to say it, but MEM and DTW are not going to fair well in a merger. MEM is too close to ATL and DTW is a dying economy.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 06:35 PM
  #19  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

Originally Posted by jdt30
We can merge or buy, the problem is we have to pay a large amount of money for that golden share. Cal would be a lot better off if the mergers did not happen and we were allowed to grow on our own at our own pace. The problem is that right now we are not large enough to compete against a combined DAL/NWA.
From what I've been reading in the USA Today, New York Times, Financial Week, and Yahoo finance CAL can't merge regardless of how much money it has. The only way CAL can merge is if NWA allows it, or merges itself. Acutally NWA doesn't even have to merge they simply have to start a merger. If the merger fails CAL is still free to do what it wants.

CAL could go to NWA with a pile of money and try to buy that ticket from them, but if NWA says no there's nothing they can do. This has been a common practice in corps. and goverments since the 1980s. It's effective and can't be circumvented. That one share, the golden share, has the authority to overide all the other shares. If the shareholders want to merge, and NWA says no, that one share makes their voice official.

Typically, the nominal shares grant the owners the right to outvote all other shares in specified circumstances. In Northwest’s case, its golden share enabled the company to block Continental from merging with another airline.

If Northwest enters into a merger agreement before Continental, however, Continental is entitled to redeem the golden share for $100. That’s true, even if an announced Northwest merger does not ultimately take place.

Calyon Securities analyst Raymond Neidl, however, believes that Northwest will be the first to move. “We anticipate the process will be led off by Delta and Northwest proposing a combination,” he said.

In that case, Continental would be free to hook up with another airline. Mr. Neidl predicts that the carrier will attempt to partner with United Airlines.
ToiletDuck is offline  
Old 02-18-2008, 07:51 PM
  #20  
No Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 362
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
DTW is a dying economy.
Still is NWA's biggest and most profitable hub
norskman2 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
yyzhead
Foreign
0
02-07-2008 05:46 PM
27 driver
Major
12
01-31-2008 03:24 PM
rolling thunder
Cargo
80
11-03-2007 05:38 PM
46Pilot
Regional
13
02-17-2006 07:18 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices