Gojets & Gulfstream
#21
Line Holder
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 40
I'm still trying to understand the whole GoJet issue. A few years ago there was hostility floating around when TSA started flying as American Connection. A friend of mine was an F.O. for Eagle and had a "No Alter-Eagle" sticker and TSA pilots now have the no "Alter EGo" stickers. My friend told me that TSA undercut the American Eagle pilot group and as a result Eagle lost flying and he was a 6 year F.O. on the 145. I understand a lot of things happened in that time frame that effected the industry, but he was happy blaming TSA for his misfortune. As a result of the American flying, TSA is flying with a scope clause in place that doesn't allow them to fly anything larger than 50 seats. When United approached TSA with the offer to fly 70 seaters (ERJ-170 or CRJ-700) TSA was bound by the scope clause and was unable without starting a new airline. GoJet was founded and the TSA pilots were offered the flying 3 times and a single seniority list, they rejected this offer 3 times. I understand the pay was below standard and the TSA pilots rejected the flying in an appreciable attempt to gain a better pay scale but were not successful. GoJet hired their own pilots and began operation. ALPA (Who has not negotiated a new contract for TSA in years) offered to represent GoJet and GoJet rejected that offer by selecting Teamsters. No where in this whole situation was there ever a picket line or a strike. I'm not trying to start a flame war, but I have never seen the non-biased, non-emotional truth written about this.
#22
I'm still trying to understand the whole GoJet issue. A few years ago there was hostility floating around when TSA started flying as American Connection. A friend of mine was an F.O. for Eagle and had a "No Alter-Eagle" sticker and TSA pilots now have the no "Alter EGo" stickers. My friend told me that TSA undercut the American Eagle pilot group and as a result Eagle lost flying and he was a 6 year F.O. on the 145. I understand a lot of things happened in that time frame that effected the industry, but he was happy blaming TSA for his misfortune. As a result of the American flying, TSA is flying with a scope clause in place that doesn't allow them to fly anything larger than 50 seats. When United approached TSA with the offer to fly 70 seaters (ERJ-170 or CRJ-700) TSA was bound by the scope clause and was unable without starting a new airline. GoJet was founded and the TSA pilots were offered the flying 3 times and a single seniority list, they rejected this offer 3 times. I understand the pay was below standard and the TSA pilots rejected the flying in an appreciable attempt to gain a better pay scale but were not successful. GoJet hired their own pilots and began operation. ALPA (Who has not negotiated a new contract for TSA in years) offered to represent GoJet and GoJet rejected that offer by selecting Teamsters. No where in this whole situation was there ever a picket line or a strike. I'm not trying to start a flame war, but I have never seen the non-biased, non-emotional truth written about this.
Some of the concessions that management gave the waterskiers included massive paycuts, loss of block or better and cuts to bennefits (which already suck).
ALPA has been in negotiations for quite a while now. Management at TSA is dragging their feet as much as they can per the RLA. The only thing that's happening is that DH and his lawyer buddies are getting rich and Hulas is going to owe a ton of retro pay. The old contract was pretty standard fare for the time that it was signed. The MEC is working hard to improve it, but management is cheap.
As far as GJ being teamsters, they aren't a member of local 747, the airline branch. A number of carriers from 747 wrote very passionate letters to national to oppose their inclusion. Instead they joined local 618. Then they preceeded to sign a CBA that was FAR below any CRJ-700 payscales in the industry. Block isn't everything. Havning worked for TSA I know their other bennies suck.
To throw the Eagle arguement into it is BS. Pilots don't make that choice. The comair strike a few years back taught the legacies that they can't rely on one regional provider. The whipsaw is happening everywhere and the only way to stop it is to not accept below average contracts. That's exactly what the GJ pilots did. As a result, it's harder for TSA, Pinnacle, RAH and every other pilot group in negotations to raise the bar.
#23
Line Holder
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: Temporarily-Undowngraded-CA
Posts: 88
There is a simple reason why people are angry. Pilots at TSA worked hard to make money for the company for years. The company then used this money to start a new airline to pick up 70 seat flying. These pilots stood up for a higher pay rate that was deserved. Instead, other non-union pilots were hired to fly for a lower rate. The new higher paying jobs, in the newer jets that these pilots had in essence worked to get, are now flown by external pilots. Thats the whole reason people at TSA were angry.
It was the GoJet pilots that chose to go work for cheaper rates than a union was in the process of negotiating. If no pilots had been willing to go, the TSA pilots would have gotten to keep the flying they helped pay for.
It was the GoJet pilots that chose to go work for cheaper rates than a union was in the process of negotiating. If no pilots had been willing to go, the TSA pilots would have gotten to keep the flying they helped pay for.
#24
I'm still trying to understand the whole GoJet issue. A few years ago there was hostility floating around when TSA started flying as American Connection. A friend of mine was an F.O. for Eagle and had a "No Alter-Eagle" sticker and TSA pilots now have the no "Alter EGo" stickers. My friend told me that TSA undercut the American Eagle pilot group and as a result Eagle lost flying and he was a 6 year F.O. on the 145. I understand a lot of things happened in that time frame that effected the industry, but he was happy blaming TSA for his misfortune. As a result of the American flying, TSA is flying with a scope clause in place that doesn't allow them to fly anything larger than 50 seats. When United approached TSA with the offer to fly 70 seaters (ERJ-170 or CRJ-700) TSA was bound by the scope clause and was unable without starting a new airline. GoJet was founded and the TSA pilots were offered the flying 3 times and a single seniority list, they rejected this offer 3 times. I understand the pay was below standard and the TSA pilots rejected the flying in an appreciable attempt to gain a better pay scale but were not successful. GoJet hired their own pilots and began operation. ALPA (Who has not negotiated a new contract for TSA in years) offered to represent GoJet and GoJet rejected that offer by selecting Teamsters. No where in this whole situation was there ever a picket line or a strike. I'm not trying to start a flame war, but I have never seen the non-biased, non-emotional truth written about this.
#25
...As a result of the American flying, TSA is flying with a scope clause in place that doesn't allow them to fly anything larger than 50 seats. When United approached TSA with the offer to fly 70 seaters (ERJ-170 or CRJ-700) TSA was bound by the scope clause and was unable without starting a new airline. GoJet was founded and the TSA pilots were offered the flying 3 times and a single seniority list, they rejected this offer 3 times...
#27
These answers are why I started the post... searching through the other forums found more of emotional vents... THANK YOU!
#28
Line Holder
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 40
It seems like pilots are their own worst enemies. Hopefully the inevitable mergers will make the industry better for pilots.
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 439
And to make matters worse, since I have been there they have gotten a 50 seat payscale into their "contract"
Which I believe will be hung over our heads later down the road.
the first fight and ill will against go jet may have eased some in the industry, but a I think a new and bigger one could be around the corner.
Which I believe will be hung over our heads later down the road.
the first fight and ill will against go jet may have eased some in the industry, but a I think a new and bigger one could be around the corner.
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: MD80
Posts: 1,111
TreverW, I don't know if you're a pilot or whatever. That Eagle VS AAConnection carriers is totally different than Gojet. Gojet is a scab operation, if you choose to go to Gojets you will be blacklisted by ALPA and other pilots, good luck finding a job. Gojet pilots are supporting an operation which was started against union approval, they undermined the bettering of TSA pilot contract, and regional airline pilots, and the whole industry in general. Those CRJ7s that you see are supposed to be TSA airplanes and crews, that is why pilots who go there will be treated accordingly. If you like flying with no dignity, avoiding other's and would like hiding your badge at the airport go ahead and fly for Gojets. Most of the guys that go there are foreign nationals and guys you wouldn't want to share a cockpit anyways.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post