Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Aborting T/O after v1...question? >

Aborting T/O after v1...question?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Aborting T/O after v1...question?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-2008, 11:47 AM
  #1  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 19
Default Aborting T/O after v1...question?

Alright guys, my friend and I had an experience in the sim the other day that caused a little debate. The scenaro took place on a 14,500 foot runway in a saab 340. We received the engine fire notification the second we hit v1. I am a F/O that was playing captain. i decided to abort and we came to a stop safely on the runway. Because it was a fire indication, i decided to stay on the ground. My flight partner said he would have continued the takeoff. We want to hear what you have to say on the matter....what if it was a 7000 foot runway???
softener is offline  
Old 02-13-2008, 11:54 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
olympic's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 747
Posts: 731
Default

There is nothing to debate. V1 is your takeoff decision speed. Looking at performance books or even charts V1 is made with a buffer knowing that the pilot will need to retard throttles, apply brakes etc. etc.
olympic is offline  
Old 02-13-2008, 11:55 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
surreal1221's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 903
Default

The aircraft are designed to fly on one engine. . .climb, secure, return to land.

But, that's what the book tells me to do if I have a failure at or after V1.

But, of course, if it occurs BEFORE V1, I'm staying on the ground.
surreal1221 is offline  
Old 02-13-2008, 11:56 AM
  #4  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Default

Originally Posted by softener
Alright guys, my friend and I had an experience in the sim the other day that caused a little debate. The scenaro took place on a 14,500 foot runway in a saab 340. We received the engine fire notification the second we hit v1. I am a F/O that was playing captain. i decided to abort and we came to a stop safely on the runway. Because it was a fire indication, i decided to stay on the ground. My flight partner said he would have continued the takeoff. We want to hear what you have to say on the matter....what if it was a 7000 foot runway???
Well, V1 is V1 for a reason.............. 14,500ft RWY is excessive, but any other rwy, in reality you are going, unless a wing falls of, then I would rather have a controlled crash then try to fly, but V1 is V1.


Although as much as I like the SAAB I remember some days out of LGA in the summer, if one of those G/E went, I was ready to go for a swim...........
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Old 02-13-2008, 11:57 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JetJock16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SkyWest Capt.
Posts: 2,963
Default

Originally Posted by softener
Alright guys, my friend and I had an experience in the sim the other day that caused a little debate. The scenaro took place on a 14,500 foot runway in a saab 340. We received the engine fire notification the second we hit v1. I am a F/O that was playing captain. i decided to abort and we came to a stop safely on the runway. Because it was a fire indication, i decided to stay on the ground. My flight partner said he would have continued the takeoff. We want to hear what you have to say on the matter....what if it was a 7000 foot runway???
I understand your argument but the real question is: what if you aborted the TO just after V1 on that 14K runway but ended up damaging the plane somehow? I know you think that nothing can go wrong but what if? If you had damaged the a/c then how would you explain your actions seeing that performance and research has proven that you can take-off and returned safely? This is a question that could end up costing your more than you’re willing to pay. We have rules that were written in blood and 99.9% of then should be followed to the "T," the other .09% is the grey area and this is not a grey area.

Like I said I understand your argument but it’s best to know when to follow the book and when not too. In this case I would have continued the TO because an abort is a compete guess regardless of the length of the runway where a TO has been proven.
JetJock16 is offline  
Old 02-13-2008, 11:58 AM
  #6  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,013
Default

V1 exists for one reason only: To mark the point at which you no longer have enough runway to guarantee stopping safely.

PRIOR to V1, you abort for serious problems, such as an engine or control failure (other abort criteria are aircraft specific).

AT or AFTER V1, you continue and fix the problem airborne.

If the runway is so long that you still have plenty left under all conditions, then V1 doesn't really exist, but for consistency it is considered to occur at the same time as Vr. You say "V1-rotate" in one breath, and after that you are also going flying.

You can always debate unlikely catastrophic control failures and whether it would better to stay on the ground and go off the end of the runway, but for training/sim purposes, if you hear "V1" you are going flying. Period.

You would have failed any airline checkride.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-13-2008, 12:00 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
olympic's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 747
Posts: 731
Default

Just to get a little technical, there is a 1 second (recognition time interval) between Vef and V1
olympic is offline  
Old 02-13-2008, 12:02 PM
  #8  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 5
Default

After V1 we are going flying. End of story.
WAflya is offline  
Old 02-13-2008, 12:05 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: CRJ
Posts: 2,356
Default

i agree with most of the posts on here. before v1 you stop it on the ground. after v1 you take it in the air. there are some very rare circumstances where you would stop on the runway if you could, even after v1. like the crj that had the gld deploy just after v1. i would have done the same thing they did and get it stopped on the ground. there would be no way in hell i would try and take a crj into they air with all the spoilers and gld deployed.. you would crash before you made it 50 ft up. this however is the exception. i know a few captains who will only abort for a few things once they get to 120kts, even if that is less than v1. the speeds are there for a reason, but keep in mind the situation. engine fires are no big deal, you go.
Airsupport is offline  
Old 02-13-2008, 12:05 PM
  #10  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 19
Default

i agree with what everyone is saying so far. however, an engine fire light could mean anything. i do not know how serious the fire is. if it is a fuel fire, my extinquishers may not work. if i go airborne, i may not get back down. Obviously, on a shorter runway, it is a different story. i would not have stayed on the ground for anything else....just the fire light.
softener is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
XJGuy
Cargo
14
10-22-2007 10:40 PM
multipilot
Career Questions
5
09-13-2007 07:35 PM
cargo hopeful
Cargo
21
03-05-2006 06:12 AM
Cjp21
Major
6
02-28-2006 06:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices