Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
SJS - The Career Killer (tv spot) >

SJS - The Career Killer (tv spot)

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

SJS - The Career Killer (tv spot)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-06-2006, 06:40 AM
  #21  
Self Employed.
 
SkyHigh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Corporate Pilot
Posts: 7,119
Default automation

Originally Posted by supercell86
Heres what confuses the hell out of me....I know someone who went throught Mesa's training program. He got onto a CRJ with alittle over 250TT and very little ME. Now he probably has never been through a real cloud before.....but how on earth do people like that go throught airline indoc, and sim training...and yet some pilots with 1000TT from a small FBO still are asked to leave? Is it skill or who you have connections and training with?? Or is it luck? I mean my feeling USED TO BE that as long as you went throguht sim training and all that your good to go. But is this true? And if it's not, my question is why the hell are people flying CRJ's who have no experience in IMC.
In the automation world experience means nothing.

SkyHigh
SkyHigh is offline  
Old 01-06-2006, 07:04 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JustAMushroom's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Capt
Posts: 611
Default

Having flown with many hew hires in recent months I can say there is not a real relationship between total time and ability. Howerver, new hire CFI's and/or rich kids who flew their mommies bonanza around are usually way behind and (even if they are not behind) thinking about something other than their immediate job. FO's who have life experience AND flying experience usually think ahead, anticipate, and are more involved..and therefor SAFER!

It's common sense, but experience means everything!
JustAMushroom is offline  
Old 01-06-2006, 07:10 AM
  #23  
done, gone skiing
 
dckozak's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Rocking chair
Posts: 1,602
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by SkyHigh
In the automation world experience means nothing.

SkyHigh
You had better hope (when you are onboard) a computer can "learn" how to do a x-wind landing, or correct and adjust when sliding sidways on a slick runway; or ever better, decide not to land when conditions warrent a divert. There is no substitution for experience. Maybe it will take a major accident to convice (you?) but safety cannot be bought or programmed into a computer!!
dckozak is offline  
Old 01-06-2006, 07:50 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fireman0174's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired 121 pilot
Posts: 1,033
Default

Originally Posted by SkyHigh
In the automation world experience means nothing.
SkyHigh
I hope you're kidding, because if you are not then you really don't have a grasp of the real world of flying.
fireman0174 is offline  
Old 01-06-2006, 08:11 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Eric Stratton's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Default

Mike I know your post was a joke but how do you feel about pilots that give up some of their scope so that they can get more pay?
Eric Stratton is offline  
Old 01-07-2006, 11:39 AM
  #26  
New boss = Old boss
Thread Starter
 
mike734's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: Ca B737
Posts: 2,762
Default

Originally Posted by Eric Stratton
Mike I know your post was a joke but how do you feel about pilots that give up some of their scope so that they can get more pay?
My opinion on this matter is pretty meaningless of course but I'll give it a shot.

Some say scope language is virtually unenforceable so why not go without it for more pay (or less of a cut). Some say scope is the most important thing in a contract. I say the only thing that matters is the intent of the management running the airline.

ALPA contracts are virtually unenforceable anyway. When you hear someone say, "They can't do that!" you know you are listening to a naive person. The bottom line is that management can do anything they want, anytime they want, for as long as they want or until an arbitrator, and ultimately a judge, say so.

It is one of the worst parts of the Railway Labor Act. The act is designed to keep the trains rolling (airliner flying). Any minor (read most) disputes must be handled for an arbitrator. Anyone who has been through an arbitration readily understands why people often say arbitration is arbitrary. Only major disputes will be looked at by a judge. This can take a year or more. So really, an airline can do what they want. The only other way to enforce the contract is by pilots making their dissatisfaction know. For example, if the company said, "From today forward all pilots will be required to stand by at the airport on reserve," they could do it and terminate anyone who did not comply. The pilots would object, of course, and create havoc. It would not be a very good way to run a business but they could do it.

Scope is important but I don't think it is very easy to write language that would slow a company down if they were intent on violating the language if they really wanted to. Mesa and J. Ornstein is an example of a company and leader with no regard for pilots or contractual language. He just does what he wants. If you have ever been subject to one of his temper tantrums you know what I mean. (Boy I keep digressing from the question)

Bottom line: Keep the pay and give up work rules is always the best course of action on the short term. It is easier to get work rules back.
mike734 is offline  
Old 01-07-2006, 04:57 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 170 babysitter
Posts: 417
Default

I'm with you Punkpilot. I'm a captain with more hours than most of these babies on here and I DON'T blame it all on the new guys. Funny how these 40 and 50 year old guys/gals on here blame the kids who were still wearing diapers while they watched pay cut after pay cut and did nothing about it. If you experienced a pay cut and got out, good for you. If you didn't you have NO room to cry now because you made your bed. You could easily have left back then. I stayed and yes I hate the pay cuts but I take responsibility for not leaving, not placing vicious blame on the news guys. Taking responsibility for some of it seems like a taboo topic with some of you guys.
Then again there's GOT to be something wrong with you if all these "newbies" pi$$ you off yet you still linger on these boards complaining. (shaking head).
Joeshmoe is offline  
Old 01-07-2006, 05:03 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Punkpilot48's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Jungle Jet
Posts: 364
Default

thanks sometimes it gets lonley when you put your opinion up on here
Punkpilot48 is offline  
Old 01-08-2006, 06:09 PM
  #29  
On Reserve
 
TSA-emb145-f/o's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: EMB-145 F/O
Posts: 10
Default "new guys"

you guys are right when it comes to experience in the a/c and abillities to make discisions, but do you really think us "new guys" passed our checkrides with luck? I know of several washout cfi guys who just "didnt" happen to make it, I was 19 at the time of interview, hired to fly the 145... I acually feel more respect than hostillity for the abilities I have and for the abilities I have expressed to get this far... I thought If I could bypass cfi than I would. You can only gain so much experience from doing pattern work all day..... My way of gaining experience is Sittin right where I am.... ......
TSA-emb145-f/o is offline  
Old 01-08-2006, 07:52 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Punkpilot48's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Jungle Jet
Posts: 364
Default

thats my point exactly
Punkpilot48 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jtaugher
Hangar Talk
4
04-30-2007 12:42 PM
sss_1981
Flight Schools and Training
5
06-12-2006 10:50 AM
deadstick
Flight Schools and Training
15
04-28-2006 05:02 PM
ryane946
Major
47
03-26-2006 09:00 AM
ryane946
Regional
15
02-16-2006 05:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices