Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
The Wall Street Journal is on to us... >

The Wall Street Journal is on to us...

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

The Wall Street Journal is on to us...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-21-2007, 09:32 PM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: E170 FO
Posts: 686
Default

You can't compared isolated examples here. There are always going to be 300 hour wonder pilots who are naturals and 2000+ hour stooges who have no business in a jet. You have to look at that statistical norm. Its a reality that generally the 1500+ crowd performs and transitions better than the 300 hour noobs. There will always be exceptions to any rule, but you can't formulate a hiring plan around them.
cbire880 is offline  
Old 12-22-2007, 03:16 AM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Flaps50's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: B777 FO FDX, C130 ANG
Posts: 538
Default

Originally Posted by cbire880
You can't compared isolated examples here. There are always going to be 300 hour wonder pilots who are naturals and 2000+ hour stooges who have no business in a jet. You have to look at that statistical norm. Its a reality that generally the 1500+ crowd performs and transitions better than the 300 hour noobs. There will always be exceptions to any rule, but you can't formulate a hiring plan around them.
The article on TSA says it all when they talk about the "fact" that more people wash out today with the experience they are getting than years ago when they were getting a more experienced candidate. It's a fact, but there will always be the guys that can learn the test the first time too.
Flaps50 is offline  
Old 12-22-2007, 08:58 AM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DAL4EVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: 88B - Loud Pipes Save Lives
Posts: 1,597
Default

[QUOTE=ImperialxRat;284938]I have to say that I don't agree with what your saying. I have been drinking tonight, I'm not gonna lie. But come on...

Now that cracked me up. It's a damn shame that a perfectly good regional pilot should be driven to drinking.
DAL4EVER is offline  
Old 12-22-2007, 09:23 AM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tinpusher007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 330 B
Posts: 1,627
Default

Originally Posted by Flaps50
The article on TSA says it all when they talk about the "fact" that more people wash out today with the experience they are getting than years ago when they were getting a more experienced candidate. It's a fact, but there will always be the guys that can learn the test the first time too.
Whats the deal with TSA's training program anyway? Supoosedly it has a reputation for being very tough with a high wash-out rate. The recruiter I spoke to even mentioned this to me. She said mjors would love me because they know of the training program at TSA.
Tinpusher007 is offline  
Old 12-22-2007, 10:38 AM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 170 babysitter
Posts: 417
Default

NTSB accident reports are riddled with deceased pilots, former CFI's, who had thousands upon thousands of hours. I know, I flew with one. CFI makes you a better decision-maker, not a better pilot so to speak.
Joeshmoe is offline  
Old 12-22-2007, 12:20 PM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Flaps50's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: B777 FO FDX, C130 ANG
Posts: 538
Default

Originally Posted by Joeshmoe
NTSB accident reports are riddled with deceased pilots, former CFI's, who had thousands upon thousands of hours. I know, I flew with one. CFI makes you a better decision-maker, not a better pilot so to speak.
A better decision maker is probably a better pilot.
Flaps50 is offline  
Old 12-22-2007, 12:50 PM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tinpusher007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 330 B
Posts: 1,627
Default

Originally Posted by Flaps50
A better decision maker is probably a better pilot.
I think he means stick and rudder skillz!
Tinpusher007 is offline  
Old 12-22-2007, 03:31 PM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Flaps50's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: B777 FO FDX, C130 ANG
Posts: 538
Default

Originally Posted by Tinpusher007
I think he means stick and rudder skillz!
Stick and Rudder is the easy part, the decision making part of it is the meat and potatoes of this profession.
Flaps50 is offline  
Old 12-22-2007, 03:35 PM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tinpusher007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 330 B
Posts: 1,627
Default

Originally Posted by Flaps50
Stick and Rudder is the easy part, the decision making part of it is the meat and potatoes of this profession.
It's easy if you stay proficient. It's very easy to get rusty as an instructor. Though it sharpens mental acuity, you very rarely manipulate the controls while teaching, especially if you teach inst-CFI.
Tinpusher007 is offline  
Old 12-22-2007, 04:17 PM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mccube5's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 722
Default

Originally Posted by Tinpusher007
It's easy if you stay proficient. It's very easy to get rusty as an instructor. Though it sharpens mental acuity, you very rarely manipulate the controls while teaching, especially if you teach inst-CFI.
while you obviously dont fly nearly as much as an instructor you still get enough hands on time to stay fresh. unless you are working strictly with inst. students you should be fine. with private guys you demonstrate some technique on all maneuvers and with comm. guys you are showing the new maneuvers and once again demonstrating some technique to go along with them.
mccube5 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedGuy
Regional
49
04-29-2008 02:03 PM
cfii2007
Regional
10
11-08-2007 01:35 PM
verticalspeed
Hangar Talk
2
07-24-2007 06:01 AM
madfoxjay
Regional
12
07-07-2007 03:48 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
06-28-2005 05:59 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices