Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
The Wall Street Journal is on to us... >

The Wall Street Journal is on to us...

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

The Wall Street Journal is on to us...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-20-2007, 10:47 AM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
the King's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: JS32 FO
Posts: 848
Default

Originally Posted by Deez340
I found my 1000+ hours as a flight instructor to be the most formative in my career. Light bulbs were constantly coming on as learning reached the correlation level watching others make mistakes as I analyzed how to correct them. I will say however that there is much more to be gained from CFII instruction than sitting in the pattern with private pilot students. (although that has tremendous value as well) The things you do teaching instruments are the same things you will do for the rest of your career as professional pilot so you might as well master them. Just the other day in the maddog sim I had to hand fly a raw data full NDB approach. I hadn't done that in a little over a decade yet it went great. I'm willing to bet that it had something to do with the hundreds of hours I spent teaching someone else to do it. Like anything in life however, you get out what you put in. So if you are going to spend 1000 hrs in the pattern, hating every minute of it, pouting, and wishing you were somewhere else then do us all a favor and don't become a CFI.

Lots of people argue that they don't have time to instruct, but for the young guys who are stuck in college for 4 years anyway, do yourself a favor and get your CFI/CFII/MEI as soon as possible and graduate with 1500+ hours and 200+ multi. It will serve you well. As I've said before your goal should be to get hired s soon as possible not with as little experience as possible.
Bingo! That's exactly what it's about. If you spent all your CFI time in the pattern in a Cessna, that's your own fault. Right now, schools have a hard time filling CFI slots and are having trouble keeping CFII's and MEI's because that is the kind of experience airlines want. Every instructor should spend some time teaching primary students, since it teaches you how to anticipate problems and keeps you on your toes. But if you want to go to the airlines Instrument and multiengine training is what you want to do.
the King is offline  
Old 12-20-2007, 10:52 AM
  #72  
On Reserve
 
jedi pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 20
Default

I would have to agree that teaching someone anything makes you better at it. Most of my life has been in sales. I would have to say that I have always been a fairly good salesman, but I did not REALLY become great until I was a trainer. I know this is a bit different but showing someone their mistakes will always help you to make less of them yourself.
jedi pilot is offline  
Old 12-21-2007, 07:16 AM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
texaspilot76's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Right Seat
Posts: 1,458
Default

I was a CFII as well. Yes, it kept me fresh with my intrument knowledge, but flying in day VFR with your student under the hood does not give you instrument operating experience.

I know you will all say "you should teach them in actual." Well, not all flight schools allow it, plus DFW airspace is congested, and if they are very busy with IFR, they do not like to accomodate practice approaches.
texaspilot76 is offline  
Old 12-21-2007, 07:24 AM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,814
Default

I more than made up for not instructing in my first three months of 121. I am a CFI/II/MEI, and I had instructed for a few weeks (even signed off 4 students) exclusively in the Seminole in the soup, but if you are any bit sharp, you will pick up what you need to very quickly, not burdening your Captains for years on end like some on APC say. Was CFI'ing a good experience for me? Absolutely, but so was getting thrown in a Jet with 500 hours.
ExperimentalAB is offline  
Old 12-21-2007, 10:37 AM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 757/767
Posts: 890
Default

Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB
I more than made up for not instructing in my first three months of 121. I am a CFI/II/MEI, and I had instructed for a few weeks (even signed off 4 students) exclusively in the Seminole in the soup, but if you are any bit sharp, you will pick up what you need to very quickly, not burdening your Captains for years on end like some on APC say. Was CFI'ing a good experience for me? Absolutely, but so was getting thrown in a Jet with 500 hours.
No offense, and I really mean that, but you can't speak intelligently about the value of providing hundreds of hours of advanced instruction unless you've provided hundreds of hours of advanced instruction. Else, how would you know? Secondly, you can't speak intelligently about the degree of burden brought on by an inexperienced FO unless you've been a Captain and flown with lots of them. Believe me, yes the instruction makes for a better more developed pilot with a deeper core of knowledge and inexperienced FO's sometimes make for a busy and dangerous cockpit. There are exceptions to both of these statements of course, but if I wanted an informed opinion about the merits of flight instruction and the perils of low time/low experience FO's the last person's council I would seek out on the subject would be a low time FO who didn't instruct.

As such I avoid making statements about the merits of military flight training because I've never experienced it. I have flown with hundreds of military pilots over the years as Captains, FOs, students, and instructors. So I can speak to the experience of flying with them but not the training they received. While we're on the subject I've found them to be just like anyone else. Some are awesome and some I wouldn't let taxi me across the ramp.

Last edited by Deez340; 12-21-2007 at 03:56 PM.
Deez340 is offline  
Old 12-21-2007, 11:49 AM
  #76  
Day puke
 
FlyJSH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Out.
Posts: 3,865
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
I was a CFII as well. Yes, it kept me fresh with my intrument knowledge, but flying in day VFR with your student under the hood does not give you instrument operating experience.
Just what PERCENTAGE of your time in jets is spent in actual IMC?

On the other hand, what Percentage of time in jets is flown under instrument REGULATIONS?

All the time one flies with students (either under IFR or while emulating IFR on a VFR flight), the instructor is able to see every mistake, note common pitfalls, and a zillion other gotchas..... just because he/she was able to OBVSERVE another pilot flying the airplane. I got to see/fly more full appraoches and holds in 100 hours of instrument instruction than I have flown in the last 3 or 4000 hours.

We encouraged students to backseat as often as possible for the same reason: they got to watch other folks mistakes



But for those of you who didn't instruct much nor hauled checks, trying to tell you why that time is good experience is a waste of time. It is kinda like oral sex: those who don't do it will never know what they are missing.
FlyJSH is offline  
Old 12-21-2007, 05:06 PM
  #77  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 60
Default

lern 2 spel
PCNUTT is offline  
Old 12-21-2007, 05:12 PM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 757/767
Posts: 890
Default

Originally Posted by PCNUTT
lern 2 spel
Learn to post substantive comments regarding the subject-matter being discussed.
Deez340 is offline  
Old 12-21-2007, 06:20 PM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Flaps50's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: B777 FO FDX, C130 ANG
Posts: 538
Default

Originally Posted by spartanpilot
I know American Eagle was looking at the school, I worked at, to pay for someones school if they signed a 5 yr. contract with them or something. It is getting to that time where airlines are looking to pay for training for day one as long as they can own their soul for as long as they want to in the regionals.
I would never sign a training contract of this magnitude with a regional airline. If you are willing to be an indentured servant to a crummy little company for many years while you will be bound to turn down good quality jobs later on down the road or risk owing the crummy company a lot of $$ for training years ago, you will truly learn what it is like to be trapped.

A better alternative would be the military for sure, where you would make a very good livable wage for 10 years or more; or paying for your training yourself with loans so you have flexibility in your career. I think an extended contract with a regional lasting many years would be a big mistake for most people. Try negotiating a contract with a regional when the majority of pilots owe a long training contract anyway, good luck with that.

I flew for the regionals for many years as well, and know that any program where they pay for a portion (I can guarantee it will be a shared cost program too) of your initial training will come with many strings that will not be evident to young college kids until it is to late. Regional airline managements for sure can not be trusted as far as you can throw them.
Flaps50 is offline  
Old 12-21-2007, 08:59 PM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,286
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
That was not my intention. I am just trying to make a point with de727ups. He feels that if you spend 1500 hours instructing before going to a regional, you will be safer and more skilled, and are OK in his book. I totally disagree. I spent two years instructing prior to my regional job. Spending all the time in the traffic pattern in a C172 and on short cross country hops in VFR did nothing to prepare me for flying a jet in all sorts of conditions. I can say it may have helped with my knowledge and getting through ground school, but as far as operating and learning flight profiles and operations, it was a very difficult transition and was not in any way like any type of flying I had done before.

DAL4EVER couldn't have said it better. We had guys that instructed for 1500 hours not make it through training, while some of the 300 hour wonder boys aced the training. I rode the jumpseat on company and there was a guy that was in my class that had about 1700 hours prior to hire. Even after a month on the line, he had trouble handling high workloads. Our lower hour guys seem to be having an easier time. Not every case is that way, but it goes to show that flight hours are not a sole measure of skill or what makes a pilot. When I instructed, the old farts that had thousands of hours and years of experience are the ones that scared me the most!
I have to say that I don't agree with what your saying. I have been drinking tonight, I'm not gonna lie. But come on... you instructed for two years, and don't see how it helped you with profile planning, operations, and especially operating the aircraft?!

I find it hard to believe that you instructed for two years. You sound more like a guy who got his CFI / CFII and went straight to a regional after 3 months.

I agree 100% with de727ups.

Where did you do your instructing at?...just curious.
ImperialxRat is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedGuy
Regional
49
04-29-2008 02:03 PM
cfii2007
Regional
10
11-08-2007 01:35 PM
verticalspeed
Hangar Talk
2
07-24-2007 06:01 AM
madfoxjay
Regional
12
07-07-2007 03:48 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
06-28-2005 05:59 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices