Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
The Wall Street Journal is on to us... >

The Wall Street Journal is on to us...

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

The Wall Street Journal is on to us...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-20-2007, 05:42 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DAL4EVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: 88B - Loud Pipes Save Lives
Posts: 1,597
Default

Originally Posted by de727ups
"DAL4EVER has hit it right on the nose. De727UPS, take note. This guy has been in the industry for a while and flies widebodies like you. He knows what he is talking about. Please read and let it soak in"

Yeah...whatever....
I read your bio and I'm trying to figure out where you think we disagree?

BTW, I flight instructed, flew night freight, ferried aircraft, Captain at a regional, all before DAL. So I don't think we're to far off in philosophy or background.
DAL4EVER is offline  
Old 12-20-2007, 06:50 AM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tinpusher007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 330 B
Posts: 1,627
Default

Originally Posted by ImperialxRat
I've only gone through one 121 training program, and for the PC type ride it was a requirement to fly raw data approaches.

Your argument definitely needs to be more on keeping proficiency, rather than your first part of the quote above.
And again, Im pretty sure most of us learned our instrument skills on probably a POS C152/172 or PA28 and probably never even heard of a flight director, much less an autopilot way back then. So, I don't see this as being an issue. However, I don't know of too many guys on the line who are going to turn off the A/P and the FD to hand fly an apporach in actual just so they can thump their chest about raw data. Further more, thats not the way the company would have you do it anyway.
Tinpusher007 is offline  
Old 12-20-2007, 06:58 AM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DAL4EVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: 88B - Loud Pipes Save Lives
Posts: 1,597
Default

Originally Posted by Tinpusher007
And again, Im pretty sure most of us learned our instrument skills on probably a POS C152/172 or PA28 and probably never even heard of a flight director, much less an autopilot way back then. So, I don't see this as being an issue. However, I don't know of too many guys on the line who are going to turn off the A/P and the FD to hand fly an apporach in actual just so they can thump their chest about it. Further more, thats not the way the company would have you do it anyway.
You guys are right and missing the point. The automation is a tool not crutch. The flight director is reactionary. It reacts to constantly changing attitude, configuration, temperature, turbulence, thrust settings, etc., to compute guidance. I have seen pilots who had to rely on the FD to fly constantly chase it and in so doing produced their own oscillations. I know in the 757/767 it takes 18-20 degrees NU pitch to maintain V2+20 to 1000, 12 degrees to accelerate to flaps up speed, and 10 degrees to maintain 250. I don't need a FD to tell me that. So guess what, that's what I pitch to and lo and behold the FD follows me and locks on to that to tell me I've got good guidance. I don't merely chase it up and down and hope I do what its guiding me to. That leads to an uncomfortable ride for all. And knowledge of this leads mastery to the airplane.

BTW for an RJ, its 12-15 degrees NU for V2+20 to 1000, 10 degrees for 200 knots, 7 1/2 degrees for 250 and 2 1/2 to 3 degrees for 290 enroute climb. Try locking those pitch attitudes and you will find the FD follows you like an obedient dog.
DAL4EVER is offline  
Old 12-20-2007, 07:05 AM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tinpusher007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 330 B
Posts: 1,627
Default

The thing is, they really don't teach that in the sim. This is my first time flying anything with a FD and I was taught to simply follow it. Then when I was getting sloppy on my single engine hand flown apporaches and I was chasing it, then I was told basically what you just said...it reacts when I needed to be more proactive. It just seemed like conflicting info from one time to another. I wish alot of it had been said up front. But I learned my lesson. Now if they will just get me to IOE I can develop some more skills.
Tinpusher007 is offline  
Old 12-20-2007, 07:06 AM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lighteningspeed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: G550 Captain
Posts: 1,206
Default

Originally Posted by DAL4EVER
You guys are right and missing the point. The automation is a tool not crutch. The flight director is reactionary. It reacts to constantly changing attitude, configuration, temperature, turbulence, thrust settings, etc., to compute guidance. I have seen pilots who had to rely on the FD to fly constantly chase it and in so doing produced their own oscillations. I know in the 757/767 it takes 18-20 degrees NU pitch to maintain V2+20 to 1000, 12 degrees to accelerate to flaps up speed, and 10 degrees to maintain 250. I don't need a FD to tell me that. So guess what, that's what I pitch to and lo and behold the FD follows me and locks on to that to tell me I've got good guidance. I don't merely chase it up and down and hope I do what its guiding me to. That leads to an uncomfortable ride for all. And knowledge of this leads mastery to the airplane.

BTW for an RJ, its 12-15 degrees NU for V2+20 to 1000, 10 degrees for 200 knots, 7 1/2 degrees for 250 and 2 1/2 to 3 degrees for 290 enroute climb. Try locking those pitch attitudes and you will find the FD follows you like an obedient dog.
This is a really good point. This something all good flight instructors try to teach their students. The FD on ILS short final can and have lagged behind and have given erroneous lateral direction guide. Only thing that will save the situation is your eyeball on the center of the runway and your knowledge of the correct angle of attack required to maintain the correct airspeed for the given situation.
Lighteningspeed is offline  
Old 12-20-2007, 07:31 AM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flaps 9's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Position: 737 F/O
Posts: 500
Default

Originally Posted by PiperDriver
I think they do not like us, young pilots and trainee pilots, because we are much younger than them. We accomplished in very short time what they have to do in life time. For example a new trainee now from the first class can fly a Cessna 172 with class cockpit; on the other hand some of them still flying some of the older DC series or 37-200 were the never seen a glass cockpit unless they are commuting or something like this. Also they don’t like seeing someone who is younger than there kids, flying left seat while they want to stay on there right seat so they can do couple turns a week or hold the perfect line.
Actually we just like those who use proper grammar and sentence structure.
flaps 9 is offline  
Old 12-20-2007, 08:18 AM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
texaspilot76's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Right Seat
Posts: 1,458
Default

Originally Posted by boilerpilot
Some people are just incredible, don't you think 727? Like trying to pit Mommy against Daddy.
That was not my intention. I am just trying to make a point with de727ups. He feels that if you spend 1500 hours instructing before going to a regional, you will be safer and more skilled, and are OK in his book. I totally disagree. I spent two years instructing prior to my regional job. Spending all the time in the traffic pattern in a C172 and on short cross country hops in VFR did nothing to prepare me for flying a jet in all sorts of conditions. I can say it may have helped with my knowledge and getting through ground school, but as far as operating and learning flight profiles and operations, it was a very difficult transition and was not in any way like any type of flying I had done before.

DAL4EVER couldn't have said it better. We had guys that instructed for 1500 hours not make it through training, while some of the 300 hour wonder boys aced the training. I rode the jumpseat on company and there was a guy that was in my class that had about 1700 hours prior to hire. Even after a month on the line, he had trouble handling high workloads. Our lower hour guys seem to be having an easier time. Not every case is that way, but it goes to show that flight hours are not a sole measure of skill or what makes a pilot. When I instructed, the old farts that had thousands of hours and years of experience are the ones that scared me the most!
texaspilot76 is offline  
Old 12-20-2007, 09:12 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
de727ups's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: UPS 757/767 Capt ONT
Posts: 4,357
Default

"I read your bio and I'm trying to figure out where you think we disagree?"

I'm not saying we disagree on anything. I'm not even sure what the question is. Might be a subject for a new thread.

My comment was simply a response to Texasflyer looking for someone, anyone, seemingly for months, even, to back up his position. Whatever works for him...
de727ups is offline  
Old 12-20-2007, 09:15 AM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
de727ups's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: UPS 757/767 Capt ONT
Posts: 4,357
Default

"He feels that if you spend 1500 hours instructing before going to a regional, you will be safer and more skilled, and are OK in his book."

Now, show me where I said that?

I do believe having the CFI and working as a CFI for a time makes you more qualified to be in the right seat of an airline jet. I also think those going through programs, and taking RJ courses, to get into the right seat of a jet at 300 hours don't belong.
de727ups is offline  
Old 12-20-2007, 09:35 AM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: 757/767
Posts: 890
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
That was not my intention. I am just trying to make a point with de727ups. He feels that if you spend 1500 hours instructing before going to a regional, you will be safer and more skilled, and are OK in his book. I totally disagree. I spent two years instructing prior to my regional job. Spending all the time in the traffic pattern in a C172 and on short cross country hops in VFR did nothing to prepare me for flying a jet in all sorts of conditions. I can say it may have helped with my knowledge and getting through ground school, but as far as operating and learning flight profiles and operations, it was a very difficult transition and was not in any way like any type of flying I had done before.

DAL4EVER couldn't have said it better. We had guys that instructed for 1500 hours not make it through training, while some of the 300 hour wonder boys aced the training. I rode the jumpseat on company and there was a guy that was in my class that had about 1700 hours prior to hire. Even after a month on the line, he had trouble handling high workloads. Our lower hour guys seem to be having an easier time. Not every case is that way, but it goes to show that flight hours are not a sole measure of skill or what makes a pilot. When I instructed, the old farts that had thousands of hours and years of experience are the ones that scared me the most!
I found my 1000+ hours as a flight instructor to be the most formative in my career. Light bulbs were constantly coming on as learning reached the correlation level watching others make mistakes as I analyzed how to correct them. I will say however that there is much more to be gained from CFII instruction than sitting in the pattern with private pilot students. (although that has tremendous value as well) The things you do teaching instruments are the same things you will do for the rest of your career as professional pilot so you might as well master them. Just the other day in the maddog sim I had to hand fly a raw data full NDB approach. I hadn't done that in a little over a decade yet it went great. I'm willing to bet that it had something to do with the hundreds of hours I spent teaching someone else to do it. Like anything in life however, you get out what you put in. So if you are going to spend 1000 hrs in the pattern, hating every minute of it, pouting, and wishing you were somewhere else then do us all a favor and don't become a CFI.

Lots of people argue that they don't have time to instruct, but for the young guys who are stuck in college for 4 years anyway, do yourself a favor and get your CFI/CFII/MEI as soon as possible and graduate with 1500+ hours and 200+ multi. It will serve you well. As I've said before your goal should be to get hired s soon as possible not with as little experience as possible.
Deez340 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedGuy
Regional
49
04-29-2008 02:03 PM
cfii2007
Regional
10
11-08-2007 01:35 PM
verticalspeed
Hangar Talk
2
07-24-2007 06:01 AM
madfoxjay
Regional
12
07-07-2007 03:48 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
06-28-2005 05:59 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices