Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
U CRJ900/emb175 people..... >

U CRJ900/emb175 people.....

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

U CRJ900/emb175 people.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-10-2007, 06:14 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
402DRVR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: A320 Right Seat
Posts: 309
Default

You know a lot of people on this forum tend to blame the 250-500 hour wonder pilot for the woes of the industry. At least in part. However how many of those low timers have ever come onto the property with the ability to vote in or out a contract? At the two ALPA carriers I have flown for I sure didn't. Not within the first probationary year.

How can someone seriously blame some low time kid for taking the job that is the very most likely one to adance his or her career? i.e. glass cockpit 121 jet time vice steam guage 152 instructor time. Obviously it would be nice if more experienced pilots were joining the ranks but do you really think an ATP rated pilot with a couple thousand hours is going to work at a pilot group which allows such low wages?

Management is vastly to blame for this but so are the pilots who vote in the LOAs. Point the finger where it belongs at not just at the low timers.
402DRVR is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 07:26 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 7ERA
Posts: 1,231
Default

Originally Posted by 402DRVR
Management is vastly to blame for this but so are the pilots who vote in the LOAs. Point the finger where it belongs at not just at the low timers.

In my humble opinion, and I say this as a pilot at a major, the blame lies entirely with the pilots at major airline who continually vote to allow more outsourcing of their jobs. Not only are they sending airplanes like an E-175 or CRJ-900 out to be flown by regional pilots, but they take away the ability of the regional pilots to negotiate higher wages by not specifying who will get that flying. The Delta pilots for example, allow 76 seat jets to be outsourced, but no mention is made as to who will fly these jets. If our contract specified all 76 seat jets have to be flown by CMR (or ASA, or SKYW, whoever) then those pilots would be able to use that exclusivity to achieve higher wages. And in the end, higher wages anywhere helps all pilots.
Xray678 is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 07:38 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AV8ER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: ERJ 145
Posts: 363
Default

Originally Posted by Xray678
In my humble opinion, and I say this as a pilot at a major, the blame lies entirely with the pilots at major airline who continually vote to allow more outsourcing of their jobs. Not only are they sending airplanes like an E-175 or CRJ-900 out to be flown by regional pilots, but they take away the ability of the regional pilots to negotiate higher wages by not specifying who will get that flying. The Delta pilots for example, allow 76 seat jets to be outsourced, but no mention is made as to who will fly these jets. If our contract specified all 76 seat jets have to be flown by CMR (or ASA, or SKYW, whoever) then those pilots would be able to use that exclusivity to achieve higher wages. And in the end, higher wages anywhere helps all pilots.
I concur.....
AV8ER is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 07:50 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: rear GV
Posts: 294
Default

Originally Posted by Xray678
In my humble opinion, and I say this as a pilot at a major, the blame lies entirely with the pilots at major airline who continually vote to allow more outsourcing of their jobs. Not only are they sending airplanes like an E-175 or CRJ-900 out to be flown by regional pilots, but they take away the ability of the regional pilots to negotiate higher wages by not specifying who will get that flying. The Delta pilots for example, allow 76 seat jets to be outsourced, but no mention is made as to who will fly these jets. If our contract specified all 76 seat jets have to be flown by CMR (or ASA, or SKYW, whoever) then those pilots would be able to use that exclusivity to achieve higher wages. And in the end, higher wages anywhere helps all pilots.
great point and well said.
DLAJ77 is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 10:47 AM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Blkflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: Cessna 152 Captain
Posts: 695
Default

Originally Posted by Xray678
In my humble opinion, and I say this as a pilot at a major, the blame lies entirely with the pilots at major airline who continually vote to allow more outsourcing of their jobs. Not only are they sending airplanes like an E-175 or CRJ-900 out to be flown by regional pilots, but they take away the ability of the regional pilots to negotiate higher wages by not specifying who will get that flying. The Delta pilots for example, allow 76 seat jets to be outsourced, but no mention is made as to who will fly these jets. If our contract specified all 76 seat jets have to be flown by CMR (or ASA, or SKYW, whoever) then those pilots would be able to use that exclusivity to achieve higher wages. And in the end, higher wages anywhere helps all pilots.
You hit the nail right on the Head
Blkflyer is offline  
Old 09-10-2007, 12:36 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
de727ups's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: UPS 757/767 Capt ONT
Posts: 4,357
Default

Regional forum peeps. You need to learn to make your point without the insults. Well over half the moderation at this site is at the regional forums. Some of you need to grow up or go somewhere else.
de727ups is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
edik
Flight Schools and Training
320
07-25-2011 04:58 PM
Tech Maven
Hangar Talk
10
08-26-2007 10:34 PM
944Turbo
Major
3
07-19-2007 02:55 AM
cloudkicker1981
Hiring News
27
10-22-2006 12:35 PM
Delta102
Hangar Talk
1
11-22-2005 12:07 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices