Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Will having my ATP help or hurt me? >

Will having my ATP help or hurt me?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Will having my ATP help or hurt me?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-11-2024, 10:04 AM
  #51  
Reserve Without End
 
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Posts: 147
Default

Originally Posted by 121noob
Yes I am a SIC, but have a full type rating, and the plane does require 2 crew.

Also I hired a professional app review company, one that was highly recommended on here, and they said absolutely nothing about PIC time not counting towords anything.



The regs --

FAR 61.51:
"A ..commercial, or airline transport pilot may log pilot in command flight time for flights-...

(1)(i)when the pilot is the sole manipulator of the controls of an aircraft for which the pilot is rated"



https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-1.../section-61.51
I have a PIC type on every jet I’ve flown. In the eyes of every company, I have been a SIC. I therefore have logged my time accordingly.

I think we have found the problem with your application and why you aren’t hearing back. The airlines are viewing your time as inappropriately logged.

An app review company isn’t going to question your time. They will simply help you format it. You desperately need a reality check on what the merits of PIC time are. It’s an immediate red flag to almost any carrier when they see a sub 1500 hour pilot logging Jet PIC.
AlikesitR is offline  
Old 05-11-2024, 12:19 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2020
Posts: 249
Default

Originally Posted by 121noob
Yes I am a SIC, but have a full type rating, and the plane does require 2 crew.

Also I hired a professional app review company, one that was highly recommended on here, and they said absolutely nothing about PIC time not counting towords anything.



The regs --

FAR 61.51:
"A ..commercial, or airline transport pilot may log pilot in command flight time for flights-...

(1)(i)when the pilot is the sole manipulator of the controls of an aircraft for which the pilot is rated"



https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-1.../section-61.51
I hope you’re not logging any 135 legs as PIC (14 CFR 135.243). And as others have said, I wouldn’t be putting sole manipulator PIC time on a 121 application. That will raise red flags and also create some awkward moments should you get an interview. You’ll also most likely not be selected for said job either, especially as hiring tightens back up.
OscarRomeo is offline  
Old 05-11-2024, 12:54 PM
  #53  
Reserve Without End
 
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Posts: 147
Default

It's a good news bad news situation for part 121 noob.

The good:

We now know why he is not getting any traction in his job hunt. The saga has spanned many forums but ends here. His resume is strong enough to generate at least an interview. Unfortunately the airlines are seeing too many red flags with his logbook.

The bad:

He's been fraudulently (even if only mistaken) logging 135 PIC time under a part 61 rule. It could be difficult to explain.
AlikesitR is offline  
Old 05-11-2024, 01:12 PM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2021
Posts: 366
Default

Originally Posted by AlikesitR
It's a good news bad news situation for part 121 noob.

The good:

We now know why he is not getting any traction in his job hunt. The saga has spanned many forums but ends here. His resume is strong enough to generate at least an interview. Unfortunately the airlines are seeing too many red flags with his logbook.

The bad:

He's been fraudulently (even if only mistaken) logging 135 PIC time under a part 61 rule. It could be difficult to explain.
His logbook is all kinds of jacked up, yet he refuses to see his error. Even after being corrected multiple times, he continues to double down and insists that he’s correct and ‘in the right,’ yet nobody is calling him. He thinks he’s ’overqualified’ and has some kind of special talents and skills as an aviator just because he flies a small corporate jet as SIC while ‘logging’ it as PIC. He’s a special kind of entitled little shxx that doesn’t belong in a 121 cockpit until he makes a serious attitude adjustment/course correction, and fixes whatever the hell needs fixing in his disaster of a logbook that he has. I bet he can’t do it. I bet he will continue to bury his head deeper.
Cleared4appch is offline  
Old 05-11-2024, 05:45 PM
  #55  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,260
Default

Originally Posted by AlikesitR
It's a good news bad news situation for part 121 noob.

The good:

We now know why he is not getting any traction in his job hunt. The saga has spanned many forums but ends here. His resume is strong enough to generate at least an interview. Unfortunately the airlines are seeing too many red flags with his logbook.

The bad:

He's been fraudulently (even if only mistaken) logging 135 PIC time under a part 61 rule. It could be difficult to explain.
It's not fraudulent. If 121Noob has logged pilot-in-command time as sole manipulator of the controls in an aircraft for which he is rated, he has logged in accordance with the regulation. This does NOT violate the regulation.

There is a difference between logging pilot in command time, and acting as pilot in command. One may log PIC time while not the acting PIC. There are cases in which two pilots may simultaneously log PIC in an airplane. There are cases in which neither pilot can log PIC. Logging is a separate issue from acting as PIC, and while multiple pilots can log PIC at the same time under certain conditions, only one may be the acting PIC.

In this case, 121Noob was not the pilot in command. He's stated clearly that he's a second in command under Part 135, that he's type rated, and that there is no possibility of an upgrade with his employer. It's clear that at no point here has 121Noob been the pilot in command with is employer. This does not prevent him from logging the time as PIC.

When we speak of how it's viewed in the industry, we must recognize that the industry at large does not concern itself necessarily with whether that sole-manipulator time is legal (it is), but instead focuses on an industry-wide assumption that one SHOULD not log PIC on a 121 or 135 flight, if one was NOT the assigned pilot in command of record. This is not regulatory, but cultural. Never the less, if one hopes to get ahead, one must understand the industry norms, and act accordingly. One who logs PIC under Part 135, when one is not the acting PIC, has not violated the regulation, but has demonstrated a poor understanding of industry expectations. If one tries to break through that based on one's own standards and interpretations, it's an uphill battle with little to gain.
JohnBurke is offline  
Old 05-11-2024, 09:18 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2019
Position: 757/767 CA
Posts: 275
Default

Originally Posted by JohnBurke
It's not fraudulent. If 121Noob has logged pilot-in-command time as sole manipulator of the controls in an aircraft for which he is rated, he has logged in accordance with the regulation. This does NOT violate the regulation.

There is a difference between logging pilot in command time, and acting as pilot in command. One may log PIC time while not the acting PIC. There are cases in which two pilots may simultaneously log PIC in an airplane. There are cases in which neither pilot can log PIC. Logging is a separate issue from acting as PIC, and while multiple pilots can log PIC at the same time under certain conditions, only one may be the acting PIC.

In this case, 121Noob was not the pilot in command. He's stated clearly that he's a second in command under Part 135, that he's type rated, and that there is no possibility of an upgrade with his employer. It's clear that at no point here has 121Noob been the pilot in command with is employer. This does not prevent him from logging the time as PIC.

When we speak of how it's viewed in the industry, we must recognize that the industry at large does not concern itself necessarily with whether that sole-manipulator time is legal (it is), but instead focuses on an industry-wide assumption that one SHOULD not log PIC on a 121 or 135 flight, if one was NOT the assigned pilot in command of record. This is not regulatory, but cultural. Never the less, if one hopes to get ahead, one must understand the industry norms, and act accordingly. One who logs PIC under Part 135, when one is not the acting PIC, has not violated the regulation, but has demonstrated a poor understanding of industry expectations. If one tries to break through that based on one's own standards and interpretations, it's an uphill battle with little to gain.
Well said… Still doesn’t address the issue of avoiding shaving one’s beard to hide the fact that one may be considering leaving one’s current employer.
HostileCombover is offline  
Old 05-12-2024, 01:40 AM
  #57  
Disinterested Third Party
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,260
Default

Perhaps put another way, what 121Noob needs to learn to do, and thus far has shown himself wholly incapable of doing, is to read the room.
JohnBurke is offline  
Old 05-12-2024, 09:02 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2018
Posts: 226
Default

Originally Posted by 121noob
I guess the concern is that if a regional sees me already having an ATP they might think I'm likely to leave them at first opportunity thus they are less likely to hire me. Maybe I am over thinking it?
Are you serious? You know when you go into training at a Regional they get you your ATP, right? So either way when you are done with training you will have your ATP. If the company has some sort of training contract, having your ATP going in does not get you out of that training contract.
followingdreams is offline  
Old 05-12-2024, 04:25 PM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2023
Position: 135 SIC
Posts: 200
Default

Originally Posted by HostileCombover
Well said… Still doesn’t address the issue of avoiding shaving one’s beard to hide the fact that one may be considering leaving one’s current employer.
I shaved months ago, don't listen to JB, half the time he is full of it.
121noob is offline  
Old 05-12-2024, 04:28 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2023
Position: 135 SIC
Posts: 200
Default

Originally Posted by followingdreams
Are you serious? You know when you go into training at a Regional they get you your ATP, right? So either way when you are done with training you will have your ATP. If the company has some sort of training contract, having your ATP going in does not get you out of that training contract.
The only regional requiring a training contract at the moment is Republic, right?
121noob is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Joliet
Regional
67
10-18-2014 09:58 PM
andycfi
Part 91 and Low Time
19
09-30-2014 06:14 AM
flyguy727
Aviation Law
3
09-25-2014 02:09 PM
Bumper
Flight Schools and Training
7
01-21-2014 10:06 AM
jdr7225
Flight Schools and Training
22
09-13-2011 08:29 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices