Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Mesaba new hires

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-18-2009, 06:54 AM
  #6471  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lighteningspeed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: G550 Captain
Posts: 1,206
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
Yes, technically you could get hired outside of the flow. However, it is unlikely due to the fact that, say a class of 30 pilots comes through, they are already filled with at least 9 mesaba and 20 pilots from compass. If the class size is larger than that, the better your chances. I asked this question to some of the people I know at NWA/Delta who deal with pilot hiring, they said to get hired outside of the flow would require passing the interview, being approved by upper management for the added training expense, and have union approval to accept more pilots from the wholly owned vs say the military. In other words, to get on outside the flow you're going to have to know a lot of people or be a minority....

Edit: Or you can quit mesaba, go work somewhere else then apply. This is the best option in my opinion.....
I agree with you except this is a moot issue because I asked a friend of mine over at DAL to track down this hiring rumor and he said according to DAL HR, DAL has no plans to hire in 2010. If anything DAL is still overstaffed and furlough in 2010 has not been ruled out.

As for getting hired outside the flow thru for XJ and Compass pilots, you are spot on. If DAL resumes hiring, you would have a better chance of getting on with DAL if you are not at XJ or Compass unless you are at the top of the seniority list.
Lighteningspeed is offline  
Old 11-18-2009, 07:09 AM
  #6472  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PinnacleFO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: CRJ Captain
Posts: 1,406
Default

Does anyone think this flow is going to last? Mesaba's is pretty good because its only 9 pilots but 20 pilots per month at compass - think about it. Delta has to train 20 pilots at mainline and then pay to train 20 pilots at compass - over and over again because delta owns compass so they are paying for training there too. Not trying to "flame" but just asking what people think.
PinnacleFO is offline  
Old 11-18-2009, 07:19 AM
  #6473  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tinpusher007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 330 B
Posts: 1,627
Default

My question is how the following scenario would play out at XJ. With the return of the entire Saab fleet soon coming, many current captains will be displaced to F/O, making 200 and 900 captain postions very senior as they already are. Most guys in those seats have indicated that they are not interested in the flow-through. One of the requirments for being able to flow is being a captain. So my question is...is it plausible that we cold get into a situation where we don't have anyone qualified to even take flow simply because they're not captains and the current ones prefer to stay at XJ? Of course this all assumes no replacement for the Saabs which is debatable but so far has not been announced or even hinted at.
Tinpusher007 is offline  
Old 11-18-2009, 07:19 AM
  #6474  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lighteningspeed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: G550 Captain
Posts: 1,206
Default

Originally Posted by PinnacleFO
Does anyone think this flow is going to last? Mesaba's is pretty good because its only 9 pilots but 20 pilots per month at compass - think about it. Delta has to train 20 pilots at mainline and then pay to train 20 pilots at compass - over and over again because delta owns compass so they are paying for training there too. Not trying to "flame" but just asking what people think.
That's actually a very good question. I think I have to agree with you that DAL management is probably thinking ways of getting rid of it, especially if the furlough has not been ruled out in 2010. Some say that DAL pilots have a contract that will deter DAL management from cancelling the flowthru program. I don't know. It's been my experience, DAL legal team will always come up with a way if they want something.

I am not too concerned with this flowthru issue because it would only benefit the guys at the top of the seniority list at XJ who can flow in less than 10 months. For the rest of us at XJ it would not work because it would take at least 5 to 6 years for us to flowthru and DAL hiring is not going to last that long. At any case, I do not think DAL will be hiring in 2010, and my friend at DAL said barring a dramatic economic recovery and massive early retirements in 2010, furlough has not been ruled out by DAL in 2010. This being the case, you can be assured DAL management is looking into this very issue as we speak.
Lighteningspeed is offline  
Old 11-18-2009, 07:30 AM
  #6475  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lighteningspeed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: G550 Captain
Posts: 1,206
Default

Originally Posted by Tinpusher007
My question is how the following scenario would play out at XJ. With the return of the entire Saab fleet soon coming, many current captains will be displaced to F/O, making 200 and 900 captain postions very senior as they already are. Most guys in those seats have indicated that they are not interested in the flow-through. One of the requirments for being able to flow is being a captain. So my question is...is it plausible that we cold get into a situation where we don't have anyone qualified to even take flow simply because they're not captains and the current ones prefer to stay at XJ? Of course this all assumes no replacement for the Saabs which is debatable but so far has not been announced or even hinted at.
Actually, last time I checked the flowthru bidding result, there are many guys at the seniority list between 150 to 300 who said they will flow, so I do not see there wil be any shortage of XJ pilots wanting to flowthru to DAL. Do you really think DAL will be hiring anytime soon? I am just asking because that is not what I am hearing from people I know over at DAL who can ask directly their HR about this rumor.

As for all Saabs being parked, I have to agree that in the next couple of years, all Saabs at XJ will be parked. I don't know about CRJ200s but DAL did announce they plan to park 100 CRJ200s from DCIs in 2010, so I don't know if XJ is also going to lose 17 CRJ200s in 2010.
Lighteningspeed is offline  
Old 11-18-2009, 07:42 AM
  #6476  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Tinpusher007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 330 B
Posts: 1,627
Default

Originally Posted by Lighteningspeed
Actually, last time I checked the flowthru bidding result, there are many guys at the seniority list between 150 to 300 who said they will flow, so I do not see there wil be any shortage of XJ pilots wanting to flowthru to DAL. Do you really think DAL will be hiring anytime soon? I am just asking because that is not what I am hearing from people I know over at DAL who can ask directly their HR about this rumor.

As for all Saabs being parked, I have to agree that in the next couple of years, all Saabs at XJ will be parked. I don't know about CRJ200s but DAL did announce they plan to park 100 CRJ200s from DCIs in 2010, so I don't know if XJ is also going to lose 17 CRJ200s in 2010.
Anytime soon as in 2010...no probably not. I think there is potential in 2011 and 2012 beyond. I do think if we get down to fleet of just 41 CR9's, the guys in the left seat would be the very most senior in the company who would not leave. I realize Im probably over-thinking things. As usual...time will tell.
Tinpusher007 is offline  
Old 11-18-2009, 08:24 AM
  #6477  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by Tinpusher007
Anytime soon as in 2010...no probably not. I think there is potential in 2011 and 2012 beyond. I do think if we get down to fleet of just 41 CR9's, the guys in the left seat would be the very most senior in the company who would not leave. I realize Im probably over-thinking things. As usual...time will tell.
This is my greatest fear here at mesaba, if we become a 41 crj fleet most of the captains will be lifers and we will go nowhere on the bottom of the list. That's why the second you can get a chance to get out of here, take it. If your main goal is to get on with DAL, worry about that later.

I've pretty much written DAL off at this point, I just hope I have enough left seat time to impress another airline such as ups, fedex, or southwest.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 11-18-2009, 08:30 AM
  #6478  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lighteningspeed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: G550 Captain
Posts: 1,206
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
This is my greatest fear here at mesaba, if we become a 41 crj fleet most of the captains will be lifers and we will go nowhere on the bottom of the list. That's why the second you can get a chance to get out of here, take it. If your main goal is to get on with DAL, worry about that later.

I've pretty much written DAL off at this point, I just hope I have enough left seat time to impress another airline such as ups, fedex, or southwest.
I am with you there. I have also written off DAL. Way too many junior guys on top of you even if you get hired today. It would take too many years to upgrade at DAL that is if you don't get furloughed. Besides, there are too many aviation analysts who are smarter than we are in predicting airline business trends who predict shrinkage of pilot roster at major airlines like DAL via utilizing joint alliance concept.
Lighteningspeed is offline  
Old 11-18-2009, 04:44 PM
  #6479  
Gets Weekends Off
 
gbntpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: FDX B757 FO
Posts: 116
Default

Originally Posted by Lighteningspeed
I don't know about CRJ200s but DAL did announce they plan to park 100 CRJ200s from DCIs in 2010, so I don't know if XJ is also going to lose 17 CRJ200s in 2010.
IMHO, there's no chance of it.

First of all, I'm 99% sure that announcement said they were going to reduce the fleets by 100 50-seaters, not specifically CRJ-200s. I can't find that announcemnt right now, so if someone has the time to look it up, please correct me if I'm wrong. Don't interchange the two terms. In this case, 50-seaters could (and probably will) include those 22 Freedom ERJs at CVG.

Secondly, I don't doubt that Delta would love to park a huge majority of the 200s, and only use the remaining ones for shorter flights to smaller stations. But, I don't think there's any possibility of Mesaba losing our 200s, at least in the reduction you're referring to, before 2011. The leases on those are too long for a return to be economically beneficial to Delta. They can only be reallocated, and I see no reason for them to move them to Comair (as the operating cost would go up, by comparison to Mesaba).

Also, with the current lease return timetable, we will have 86 planes (41 CRJ 900, 19 CRJ 200, and 26 SF-340) in December 2010. If we lose so many as to drop below 79 aircraft, the pilot contract becomes ammendable. Not to trivialize the possibility of an additional 70 furloughs, but we can only lose 7 more planes without some expensive consequences for Delta.
"If the Company’s fleet (consisting of all of the aircraft operated
by the Company in revenue service, including any aircraft that
are used or that could be used as a maintenance or operational
spare(s) consists of 79 or more aircraft on December 1, 2010,
this Letter of Agreement will not be subject to amendment until
June 1, 2012. If the amendable date of this Letter of
Agreement is deferred in accordance with the terms of this
paragraph, this Letter of Agreement will continue in full force
and effect until June 1, 2012, and shall renew itself without
change until each succeeding June 1 thereafter, unless written
notice of intended change is served in accordance with Section
6, Title I of the Railway Labor Act, as amended, at least ninety
(90) days but not more than one hundred eighty (180) days
prior to June 1, 2012, or any June 1 thereafter."
That would be a huge cost for Delta. They're not going to give us the opportunity to get anything more contractually than what we have now. For example, right now our FO payrates are based on the 2004 rate when our fleet was primarily turboprops. Current payrates for "jet" airlines are reasonably higher, especially considering our work rules (100% cancellation pay, 150% pay for open time, minimum day, etc.). Management's favorite term in any negotiation seems to be "industry average", which for this example, works against them.

Last edited by gbntpilot; 11-18-2009 at 05:03 PM.
gbntpilot is offline  
Old 11-18-2009, 05:11 PM
  #6480  
Gets Weekends Off
 
gbntpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: FDX B757 FO
Posts: 116
Default

Originally Posted by Tinpusher007
...many current captains will be displaced to F/O, making 200 and 900 captain postions very senior as they already are. Most guys in those seats have indicated that they are not interested in the flow-through.
Yes and no. There was a call by a number of pilots to ALPA shortly after the merger to restart the flow line from the top of the list again. Evidently, some of the guys who have opted out the flow regretted it after the details of the new NWA/DAL pilot contract were made available. It's just a better contract now with higher pay rates. To my knowledge, this issue hasn't come up as a real discussion yet because we haven't been in a flow situation since the merger. As far as I know, ALPA heard the argument, but didn't put any time and resources into it because it simply doesn't matter right now. But, when it becomes relevant again, I would bet you'll not only see a discussion of restarting the flow from the top, but also an increase in the number of pilots taking the flow.
gbntpilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
copcar1988
Regional
17
10-24-2006 05:34 PM
Ellen
Regional
5
10-22-2006 07:24 PM
joel payne
Regional
0
09-25-2006 08:54 AM
fireman0174
Regional
10
04-25-2006 07:56 PM
CRM1337
Regional
2
10-14-2005 05:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices