Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Mesaba new hires

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-07-2008, 07:08 PM
  #3621  
Gear handle manipulator
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: B-737 First officer
Posts: 246
Default

Who knows man I've heard it all................
SmoothLanderJ is offline  
Old 09-07-2008, 07:41 PM
  #3622  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Seat warmer
Posts: 80
Default

We all will hold our breath and wait.
Aileron is offline  
Old 09-07-2008, 08:11 PM
  #3623  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 737 Right
Posts: 121
Default

So I've been pondering the fact why after took 30+ FO's from the Saab over to the 900 that they're putting 30 or so new hires onto the saab... I'm certainly not complaining but I'm just wondering what the thoughts of crew planning are after sending a bunch of us through training again.

Last edited by flythemuppets; 09-07-2008 at 08:18 PM.
flythemuppets is offline  
Old 09-08-2008, 04:48 AM
  #3624  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: FO
Posts: 105
Default

Originally Posted by flythemuppets
So I've been pondering the fact why after took 30+ FO's from the Saab over to the 900 that they're putting 30 or so new hires onto the saab... I'm certainly not complaining but I'm just wondering what the thoughts of crew planning are after sending a bunch of us through training again.
I think it is all about timing. Most of the saab fo's who went to the 900 are on the line now. The new hires just going into the saab will not be online until November sometime. Instead of leaving the saabs overstaffed for 8 months, they started to even things out. These new saab fo's must be starting for a reason whether it is a flow, more flying, or more aircraft. Does this realignment really save any money? You would have to have all the costs for that one.
stobelma is offline  
Old 09-08-2008, 05:08 AM
  #3625  
Line Holder
 
405PA's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 46
Default

Originally Posted by bored
RORWIZARD -

The idea is NOT to have a balance between FOs and CAs. There is usually always more CA positions than there are FO positions. That's why it's roughly 5 CAs and 4 FOs per plane. CA's get more vacation time and go to training twice a year, therefore requiring the need for more of them.

Something BIG is happening kids... something BIGGER than we ever imagined. NOPE! Something Mesaba has never seen before. Hold on folks, you thought the last 1.5 years was a ride? Strap in and get ready for this one.
You are either bad at math or reading comprehension.

Present Staffing: CA FO CA/plane FO/plane
MSP SF3---90----91----4.5---------4.55
DTW SF3---84----99-----4.2--------4.95
MEM SF3---53----55----5.88--------6.11
MSP CR9---75----68------6.25-------5.66
DTW CR9---82----77----4.55*----4.27*
MEM CR9---32----32------5.33--------5.33
MSP CRJ---94--84----5.53-----4.95
* Based on the the 18 total planes that are going to be based there.
510 CA/506 FO Currently
Proposed Staffing: CA FO
MSP SF3 92 91
DTW SF3 90 99
MEM SF3 53 55
MSP CR9 75 68
DTW CR9 82 77
MEM CR9 32 32
MSP CRJ 96 94

The only thing big that is going on here are RUMORS! Ones that pilots keep making up. These are below rumors. This is a bunch of made up BS by people on a message board every time a vacancy comes out.

Last edited by 405PA; 09-08-2008 at 05:16 AM.
405PA is offline  
Old 09-08-2008, 05:23 AM
  #3626  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: FO
Posts: 105
Default

Originally Posted by 405PA
You are either bad at math or reading comprehension.

Present Staffing: CA FO CA/plane FO/plane
MSP SF3---90----91----4.5---------4.55
DTW SF3---84----99-----4.2--------4.95
MEM SF3---53----55----5.88--------6.11
MSP CR9---75----68------6.25-------5.66
DTW CR9---82----77----4.55*----4.27*
MEM CR9---32----32------5.33--------5.33
MSP CRJ---94--84----5.53-----4.95
* Based on the the 18 total planes that are going to be based there.
510 CA/506 FO Currently
Proposed Staffing: CA FO
MSP SF3 92 91
DTW SF3 90 99
MEM SF3 53 55
MSP CR9 75 68
DTW CR9 82 77
MEM CR9 32 32
MSP CRJ 96 94

The only thing big that is going on here are RUMORS! Ones that pilots keep making up. These are below rumors. This is a bunch of made up BS by people on a message board every time a vacancy comes out.
So are you saying this is normal staffing and hiring?
stobelma is offline  
Old 09-08-2008, 06:45 AM
  #3627  
Gets Weekends Off
 
submachXJ's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: CRJ -200
Posts: 131
Default

Corrected below

Last edited by submachXJ; 09-08-2008 at 06:48 AM. Reason: Reposted
submachXJ is offline  
Old 09-08-2008, 06:47 AM
  #3628  
Gets Weekends Off
 
submachXJ's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: CRJ -200
Posts: 131
Default

Originally Posted by stobelma
So are you saying this is normal staffing and hiring?

Yep makes sense. You need to be bulked up on FO's your going to be upgrading and the most senior FO's are on the Saab. The 900 and 200 guys started a few months after the Initial ones in 2007 and just about all FO's where forced into the saab before 2007. If you look at the crj 200 and 900 FO numbers it is staffed as stated but I am sure if there is something coming that will be bulked up too. Also numbers will start to skew because pilots are in training more now.
submachXJ is offline  
Old 09-08-2008, 07:12 AM
  #3629  
Line Holder
 
405PA's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 46
Default

Originally Posted by stobelma
So are you saying this is normal staffing and hiring?
Once again reading comprehension. Go back read the quote in my original post. Look at the bold in the quote that I am refering to. According to Bored's logic he was saying we have 20% more CA's than FO's(5 ca's/4 fo's). As you can see from the bold in my post(below the quote in my original post) that is not the case. I don't think there is a magical formula how ever it's looking like an industry average of about 11 pilots per plane is what is shaking out.

17 + 36 + 49 = 102 total airframes x 11 ~1122 pilots. Which we haven't quite got to yet. No silly rumors just simple math.
405PA is offline  
Old 09-08-2008, 07:46 AM
  #3630  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bored's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 493
Default

405 -

Ok - you're refuting my claim that we traditionally staff heavier on Captains than FOs. The numbers don't seem to add up in my favor, but we've always had more CAs than FOs. Could it be the average longevity at the airline is dramatically lower than has been tradition? Perhaps. Or the fact we've just DOUBLED our size in the most unprecedented growth Mesaba has seen in its long history.

Do you honestly believe though, that what is going on right now, as in this latest buzz is normal ops? Come on man, I don't know how long you've been at XJ, but pull your head out of the sand and look at the facts. I don't claim to know EXACTLY what is going on, as in the number of planes and which kind. But I do know how to read and comprehend numbers. They're adding up and equaling MORE GROWTH.

- Dramatic increased hiring in pilots
- Hiring ground and sim instructors
- Hiring LCAs for all fleets
- Increased FA staffing numbers - beyond the normal revolving door staffing

These sorts of things don't happen to an airline that is coming to the tail end of growth and virtually zero attrition. So again... something big is happening. Until it's announced all we can do is look at the facts and get ready to ride the wave.

BTW - we have 17 200s of which all are delivered, not 18. Also, the FO numbers on the last 2 vacancies are increased to prepare for backfilling as FOs go to upgrade. It's really not that complicated.

Last edited by bored; 09-08-2008 at 08:02 AM.
bored is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
copcar1988
Regional
17
10-24-2006 05:34 PM
Ellen
Regional
5
10-22-2006 07:24 PM
joel payne
Regional
0
09-25-2006 08:54 AM
fireman0174
Regional
10
04-25-2006 07:56 PM
CRM1337
Regional
2
10-14-2005 05:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices