Originally Posted by apachetype
(Post 2930574)
I’d be curious to know if they completed both the Airline App (and appropriately set the target to Aviate) and the application at
https://ual-pro.taleo.net/careersect...ob=DEN00003779 On one of the conference calls the United rep said the intention is to interview all who apply. Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk |
I can't help but think that this is a bit snobbish on Uniteds part. The job itself is nothing special.
|
Originally Posted by No Land 3
(Post 2930707)
I can't help but think that this is a bit snobbish on Uniteds part. The job itself is nothing special.
I know somebody will say “because they won’t cannibalize their own regionals”. Okay, well guess what..those pilots they turn down can and just might go to one of United’s competitors who doesn’t give a ******* about United’s regional staffing. Instead of gaining a qualified pilot who is already familiar with United’s system, now they’ve potentially lost that pilot to a competitor. Sounds pretty bass ackwards to me. |
Originally Posted by backtoregionals
(Post 2930715)
Why is a captain for a regional flying United owned planes with United ticketed passengers not qualified to fly for United?
|
Originally Posted by drywhitetoast
(Post 2930739)
You guys really need to get over this thinking whether right or wrong. I used to think that way and had a bit of that attitude during my first interview in 2016 with the CPP program. I believe HR can pick up on that and may be one of the reasons I got the TBNT my first go around. I reassessed my thinking for the second go and prepared as though it was an off the street interview and lost the "I deserve to be here because I already fly you pax around attitude".
However, after the fact, If you got a TBNT, and you ARE flying their passengers, on their airplanes, it IS stupid and valid for some one to vent some steam on a forum. |
Originally Posted by drywhitetoast
(Post 2930739)
You guys really need to get over this thinking whether right or wrong. I used to think that way and had a bit of that attitude during my first interview in 2016 with the CPP program. I believe HR can pick up on that and may be one of the reasons I got the TBNT my first go around. I reassessed my thinking for the second go and prepared as though it was an off the street interview and lost the "I deserve to be here because I already fly you pax around attitude".
|
Originally Posted by No Land 3
(Post 2930707)
I can't help but think that this is a bit snobbish on Uniteds part. The job itself is nothing special.
|
Originally Posted by backtoregionals
(Post 2930793)
I didn’t go in their with that attitude. It’s just frustrating how they turn down fully qualified pilots who already fly their metal. Chill.
|
Originally Posted by PhantomHawk
(Post 2930850)
Then why are so many people so upset about not getting it?
You already knew that though right? |
Originally Posted by John Carr
(Post 2930344)
Whether it's labeled the "CPP" or "AVIATE", that's all it ever was.
While you beat this drum constantly, it was amazing to watch how many that didn't at all conform to being a good employee at the regional made it though. Multiple training failures, often due to attitude. Terrible attendance record, again due to attitude and not family, FMLA, or whatever other issues. And there's been more than a few from the CPP (pre AVAITE) as well that were complete head scratchers. It's not a one size fits all, BY ANY MEANS. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:35 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands