Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Airlines requiring part 117 extensions >

Airlines requiring part 117 extensions

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Airlines requiring part 117 extensions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-24-2019, 09:01 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Posts: 382
Default

Originally Posted by DarkSideMoon
FAA reports to Congress, Congress reports to lobbyists. Our friendly aviation authority is between a bit of a rock and a hard place.
ALPA-PAC - ALPA
BrewCity is offline  
Old 07-24-2019, 09:20 AM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,490
Default

At Envoy, yes, you must fatigue to avoid extension which involves filing a fatigue report. Depending on what is said in the report, you may or may not get paid. I have not had to fatigue but apparently they are looking for documentation on details to prove why you are fatigued (noisy hotel... what time did you call to complain at the front desk/did you file a complaint with the company for the noise, etc).

ALSO, I have heard that depending on what is in your fatigue report and what you say on the recorded line when you call in fatigue, your fatigue call may be turned into a sick call or even a missed assignment. Again, not from personal experience. I hope those are just crew room stories with a "there's more to the story" caveat, but I don't know.
highfarfast is offline  
Old 07-24-2019, 09:24 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,607
Default

Originally Posted by trip
It's a done deal, the FAA completely caved to industry pressure. To add insult to injury they claim disciplinary action or pay issues are between the company and the employee.
Fatigued is the only option unless you have other union/company agreements in place.
This is incorrect. The FAA told Delta that their policy was not acceptable and at Delta you now must accept a extension. They also said the 2 hour flight extension should be used infrequently and only under unusual circumstances.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 07-24-2019, 09:26 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 411
Default

Originally Posted by TheRaven
Maybe I’m incorrect, but I thought Extension of the FDP under FAR 117 required the consent of the pilot.....unlimited extensions of 30 minutes or less, and no more extensions until the pilot receives a 30hr break if an extension is more than 30 minutes. I’ll have to reread the regulation...perhaps I’m mistaken
This is a common misconception. 117 states the pilot must concur the extension is legal, not concur to the extension itself.
Random Task is offline  
Old 07-24-2019, 09:35 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 1,130
Default

Originally Posted by DarkSideMoon
FAA reports to Congress, Congress reports to lobbyists. Our friendly aviation authority is between a bit of a rock and a hard place.
Faa does not report to Congress.
Congress could invite or subpoena the FAA.
captive apple is offline  
Old 07-24-2019, 10:49 AM
  #36  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 408
Default

The whole point is that the extension can be used for “unforeseen OPERATIONAL circumstances” if need be, such as delays, re-position, etc. If one chooses not to accept this and the company makes you call fatigue, that’s completely acceptable because there is no other valid excuse. Why are you fatigued? Because I’m exceeding my normal duty time and I’m exhausted...clear cut. If the company takes punitive action (lost pay, discipline, etc.) this is 100 percent completely UNacceptable because now they’re making the pilot choose between accepting punitive damages OR operating an aircraft under a fatigued mindset. 117 was created as a proactive measure, NOT a reactionary measure.
stabapch is offline  
Old 07-24-2019, 10:50 AM
  #37  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2019
Posts: 408
Default

Originally Posted by Random Task
This is a common misconception. 117 states the pilot must concur the extension is legal, not concur to the extension itself.
If you’re fatigued, you’re not legal. No other questions should be asked.
stabapch is offline  
Old 07-24-2019, 11:08 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 162
Default

Search:

"FDP Extensions under 117 and your responsibilities under the law"
Xjrstreetcar is offline  
Old 07-24-2019, 11:21 AM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,729
Default

Originally Posted by stabapch
If you’re fatigued, you’re not legal. No other questions should be asked.
Yah except at least at Envoy the company later determines whether you were actually fatigued or not and which determines whether to pay you or not.
havick206 is offline  
Old 07-24-2019, 11:23 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Position: ERJ-170
Posts: 528
Default

Excellent read, thanks for posting!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Web265 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
iFlyRC
Mesa Airlines
6895
10-23-2020 04:15 AM
FutureJetPilot
Regional
0
01-04-2014 06:46 AM
skylover
Aviation Law
482
11-14-2013 08:20 PM
Sir James
Major
1
07-17-2005 08:47 PM
WatchThis!
Major
0
07-10-2005 03:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices