Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Glass Time

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-01-2007, 01:28 PM
  #11  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,091
Default

At the entry level, get lots of steam experience...there are many entry level jobs flying airplanes with steam gauges, and if you think going from steam to glass is hard, trying going from glass to steam with little overall steam time

You are unlikely to fail a training event because you are new to glass, but if you have to do a steam training event without those basic skills, you will be toast.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 04-01-2007, 03:11 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HotMamaPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FO - 757/767
Posts: 1,228
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
It only takes probably 10 hours to get used to a new presentation on electronic displays...
you must use the autopliot a lot. i myself prefer to handfly through 28k
HotMamaPilot is offline  
Old 04-01-2007, 03:14 PM
  #13  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Default

Originally Posted by HotMamaPilot
you must use the autopliot a lot. i myself prefer to handfly through 28k
Damn...............you get sexier by the minute hahaha,
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Old 04-01-2007, 03:28 PM
  #14  
Gets EVERY weekend off
 
flynavyj's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: SIC
Posts: 1,367
Default

i myself didn't find the transition from steam to glass difficult, as i didn't have any "glass" time , and all my instrument time had to do w/ a real scan, not the glass scan. when i was hired on for the jet, i bought the program of the plane for flight sim, sat in the chair, did approach after approach, with the intention of developing a scan, by the time i got to the actual sim, i had a "mediocre" scan, and was able to pass right along.
flynavyj is offline  
Old 04-01-2007, 03:30 PM
  #15  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,611
Default

Originally Posted by HotMamaPilot
you must use the autopliot a lot. i myself prefer to handfly through 28k
And that has to do with getting used to the presentation of information on the displays how?

I fly the Collins ProLine 4 in the CRJ and when I flew a ProLine21 King Air a few months back it took me a while to get used to how the information was displayed differently. The ADI/HSI presentation was *basically* the same but the location and presentation of other information on the PFD and MFD was different. I can only imgaine switching between the Collins and Honeywell...
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 04-01-2007, 03:55 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HotMamaPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FO - 757/767
Posts: 1,228
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
And that has to do with getting used to the presentation of information on the displays how?
I fly the Collins ProLine 4 in the CRJ and when I flew a ProLine21 King Air a few months back it took me a while to get used to how the information was displayed differently. The ADI/HSI presentation was *basically* the same but the location and presentation of other information on the PFD and MFD was different. I can only imgaine switching between the Collins and Honeywell...
meaning that if it only took you 10 hours to learn glass, you probably aren't using it properly(e.g. overuse of autopilot). comprende?
HotMamaPilot is offline  
Old 04-01-2007, 03:57 PM
  #17  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,611
Default

Originally Posted by HotMamaPilot
meaning that if it only took you 10 hours to learn glass, you probably aren't using it properly(e.g. overuse of autopilot). comprende?
It ain't exactly rocket science...guess I'm an overachiever then...
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 04-01-2007, 04:06 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
saab2000's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,750
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
It ain't exactly rocket science...guess I'm an overachiever then...
Well, we only hire the bright ones at AWAC, right???

Don't worry if you don't fly by hand to FL280. It doesn't take some super skill to do that.

There is not much difference between interpreting data on mechanical altimeters and airspeed indicators and interpreting data on a screen with altitude and speed 'tape' indicators.

You are right, it ain't rocket science....
saab2000 is offline  
Old 04-01-2007, 04:18 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: EMB 145 FO
Posts: 425
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
It ain't exactly rocket science...guess I'm an overachiever then...


HAHAHAHAHAHA finally well put. G1000=even retards can fly "glass"
mking84 is offline  
Old 04-01-2007, 06:05 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HotMamaPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FO - 757/767
Posts: 1,228
Default

Originally Posted by saab2000
Well, we only hire the bright ones at AWAC, right???

Don't worry if you don't fly by hand to FL280. It doesn't take some super skill to do that.

There is not much difference between interpreting data on mechanical altimeters and airspeed indicators and interpreting data on a screen with altitude and speed 'tape' indicators.

You are right, it ain't rocket science....
must have been a lil more difficult for you saab...you know, with the metric system and all.
HotMamaPilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
38
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
Islandhopper
Hiring News
22
08-05-2007 06:36 PM
DON*T HATE ERAU
Regional
12
01-08-2007 06:13 AM
iahflyr
Flight Schools and Training
10
10-03-2006 03:36 PM
TipTip35
Cargo
13
01-22-2006 03:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices