Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Cost Per Seat Mile

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-25-2007, 04:44 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
RedBaron007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: E-190 Leftist
Posts: 300
Default Cost Per Seat Mile

Lately I've been searching for a place where I could find the cost per seat mile of aircraft (just out of sheer curiosity). I've heard a lot of arguments that RJs are a lot less cost effective than larger jets or turboprops. I don't have reason to doubt these arguments wrong, but I was just wondering if there were any hard numbers out there to get. If anyone knows of a website/source, my curiosity would be much obliged. Thanks!
RedBaron007 is offline  
Old 03-25-2007, 04:55 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 260
Default

Originally Posted by RedBaron007
Lately I've been searching for a place where I could find the cost per seat mile of aircraft (just out of sheer curiosity). I've heard a lot of arguments that RJs are a lot less cost effective than larger jets or turboprops. I don't have reason to doubt these arguments wrong, but I was just wondering if there were any hard numbers out there to get. If anyone knows of a website/source, my curiosity would be much obliged. Thanks!
http://www.bombardier.com/en/0_0/0_0...ay_16_2006.pdf

That's a start. Publicly traded airlines report their CASM (cost per available seat mile)..... The cost is directly related to the companies operational efficiency...as opposed to just the cost of gas, oil, maintenance, and underpaid crews.
Quagmire is offline  
Old 03-25-2007, 05:00 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
RedBaron007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: E-190 Leftist
Posts: 300
Default

Originally Posted by Quagmire
http://www.bombardier.com/en/0_0/0_0...ay_16_2006.pdf

That's a start. Publicly traded airlines report their CASM (cost per available seat mile)..... The cost is directly related to the companies operational efficiency...as opposed to just the cost of gas, oil, maintenance, and underpaid crews.
Thanks. I've checked out airline quarterly reports, but I've found that they're good for a system-wide analysis, but its hard/impossible to break them down as to aircraft type (unless the company only operates one type). I'll definitely check out the bombardier link, though.
RedBaron007 is offline  
Old 03-25-2007, 05:01 PM
  #4  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,091
Default

Aviation Week seems to publish this annually, but it's a subscription site.

I know off the top of my head that SWA CASM is less than $0.09, while RJ's are typically $0.11+

Other mainline airplanes vary from $ 0.09 - $0.14+, IIRC.

Keep in mind that RJ CASMs are artificially low due to slave-labor wages...and SWA still has them beat.

Bigger airplanes inherently are more effecient (economy of scale), but there are lots of variables other than size...age, Mx, type of operation, labor cost, etc. A high CASM might still be profitable if nobody else wants to bother with the route in question, and you can charge accordingly.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-25-2007, 07:23 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HotMamaPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: FO - 757/767
Posts: 1,228
Default

Originally Posted by RedBaron007
Lately I've been searching for a place where I could find the cost per seat mile of aircraft (just out of sheer curiosity). I've heard a lot of arguments that RJs are a lot less cost effective than larger jets or turboprops. I don't have reason to doubt these arguments wrong, but I was just wondering if there were any hard numbers out there to get. If anyone knows of a website/source, my curiosity would be much obliged. Thanks!
only on a small amount of routes. they are plenty cost effective, especially when you only pay a crew burger king wages
HotMamaPilot is offline  
Old 03-25-2007, 09:02 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
RedBaron007's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: E-190 Leftist
Posts: 300
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Aviation Week seems to publish this annually, but it's a subscription site.

I know off the top of my head that SWA CASM is less than $0.09, while RJ's are typically $0.11+

Other mainline airplanes vary from $ 0.09 - $0.14+, IIRC.

Keep in mind that RJ CASMs are artificially low due to slave-labor wages...and SWA still has them beat.

Bigger airplanes inherently are more effecient (economy of scale), but there are lots of variables other than size...age, Mx, type of operation, labor cost, etc. A high CASM might still be profitable if nobody else wants to bother with the route in question, and you can charge accordingly.
I never thought of Aviation Week. My dad just renewed his subscription...I'll have to look out for that yearly issue. Thanks for reminding me of that, and I appreciate that other info (as well as everyone else's).
RedBaron007 is offline  
Old 03-25-2007, 09:03 PM
  #7  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

http://www.icao.int/icao/en/ro/allpi...g4/wp28app.pdf

737-800 for teh win!
ToiletDuck is offline  
Old 03-26-2007, 08:00 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 737 Left
Posts: 828
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck

Take those numbers with a grain of salt....As of SUMMER 2000
DMEarc is offline  
Old 03-26-2007, 08:01 AM
  #9  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

Originally Posted by DMEarc
Take those numbers with a grain of salt....As of SUMMER 2000
The year might have changed and the numbers might have changed but if it burned the least then it's still burning the least now.
ToiletDuck is offline  
Old 03-26-2007, 08:06 AM
  #10  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,091
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
The year might have changed and the numbers might have changed but if it burned the least then it's still burning the least now.
Those numbers are HOURLY cost, not cost per seat-mile. Obviously bigger airplanes cost more to operate, but they also have more seats and longer range...ie more revenue! By your logic a C-152 is the ideal airliner (lowest block hour cost with no regard for revenue generating capacity)

I'm certain that the 777 or A330 would have the lowest CASM.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
38
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
stanrhintx
Regional
76
11-10-2006 09:56 AM
Dune
Foreign
7
06-30-2006 07:18 AM
Delta102
Hangar Talk
1
11-18-2005 08:30 AM
SWAjet
Major
1
09-21-2005 12:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices