Public demand for more experienced pilots
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 7ER B...whatever that means.
Posts: 3,982
There are other 135s that do it. It appears Mesa does not, and in my feverish and hasty attempt to rebut, they were included. I withdraw the Mesa "pay to play" argument.
I can only hope that those who feel my post was "flamebait" are low-timers themselves and when they gain a few thousand hours realize they are more qualified than when they first started. Otherwise they should be happy to be replaced by the 190 hour guy who will work for 1/4 his wage.
If my original idea is not the way to get better work rules and pay, then what is?
I can only hope that those who feel my post was "flamebait" are low-timers themselves and when they gain a few thousand hours realize they are more qualified than when they first started. Otherwise they should be happy to be replaced by the 190 hour guy who will work for 1/4 his wage.
If my original idea is not the way to get better work rules and pay, then what is?
I'm not going to tell you not to write your op-ed and send it in to your local paper. By all means, do it. But the way to get better work rules and pay is to stay away from places that do not value your skills and contributions to the company's success (like Mesa) and to stand united as a pilot group when managements try to grab too much from the table.
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 150 left seat if I'm lucky
Posts: 172
I'm not going to tell you not to write your op-ed and send it in to your local paper. By all means, do it. But the way to get better work rules and pay is to stay away from places that do not value your skills and contributions to the company's success (like Mesa) and to stand united as a pilot group when managements try to grab too much from the table.
But do YOU feel you were a better pilot than you were when you were at 1/2 the time? 1/8th the time? If not, then how can you ask for more pay?
I'll make you a deal. If you can convince me I will be just as good at 200 hours as I would be at 1200 with CFII hours and Multi time under my belt, I'll take Mesa's pace program for 14k when I hit 200 for their guaranteed interview.
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Student Pilot
Posts: 849
Don't some of the overseas airlines have a program where they bring in zero time candidates,select the best ones, get them a commercial license and then stick them in the right seat of a Boeing/Airbus? You would think that's an accident waiting to happen but it never happens. Scares the bejeeezus out of me.
It's completely different in those countries in terms of how things work, so it's not a fair comparison at all.
I'm familiar with the recruiting/training practices of a few overseas airlines, and they pick the few BRIGHTEST, most intelligent students... I mean like the top 1% or something like that. In Europe, flying is extremely expensive so there isn't much of a GA market like there is in the US... in Asia, there are hardly any flight schools... so pilot slots in both regions are rare and competitive. It's like not the US where literally anyone with $$$ or a cosigner can become a pilot. So you MUST be the best.
(I'm not trying to argue that you have to be a genius to fly an airplane... but that is one of the reasons why those overseas cadet programs work... because they pick the best candidates to begin with... smart and motivated.)
And training is wholly different too. I have a friend who instructs at IFTA, which trains newhires for ANA, EVA, etc. From day one, the students are trained to think, act and perform like airline pilots. It's all about procedures... One minor example, he told me that if you're taxiing and you deviate from the taxiway centerline even for one second you have to announce it (in specific terms, which I forgot.) All in all, it's pretty strict and rigorous. Many of us regular joes would not survive such training!
BTW, these cadet programs don't cram the training in 90 days, like some of the pilot programs we have here in the US... the airlines that I know of spend 2-3 years training their cadets.
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 150 left seat if I'm lucky
Posts: 172
#36
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 170 babysitter
Posts: 417
If you could run an airline based solely on the fact that you'd have much higher prices based on the fact that your crew was advertised to have higher than the average flight hours then you'd leave the rest of the airlines in the dust. Speaking of dust you might want to see if you can get your hands on some fairy dust to help bring this idea to fruition.
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 7ER B...whatever that means.
Posts: 3,982
But do YOU feel you were a better pilot than you were when you were at 1/2 the time? 1/8th the time? If not, then how can you ask for more pay?
I'll make you a deal. If you can convince me I will be just as good at 200 hours as I would be at 1200 with CFII hours and Multi time under my belt, I'll take Mesa's pace program for 14k when I hit 200 for their guaranteed interview.
Heres a tip you might want to take to heart (assuming you aren't some numbnut flame baiter who wandered over from flightinfo): don't go shooting your mouth off to a bunch of guys and girls who have been there and done that. You will find as you move through the aviation world that most pilots are humble among their peers and those that aren't probably should be.
Last edited by freezingflyboy; 03-05-2007 at 05:29 PM.
#39
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 150 left seat if I'm lucky
Posts: 172
Heres a tip you might want to take to heart (assuming you aren't some numbnut flame baiter who wandered over from flightinfo): don't go shooting your mouth off to a bunch of guys and girls who have been there and done that. You will find as you move through the aviation world that most pilots are humble among their peers and those that aren't, should be.
I'm hardly shooting my mouth off. I still believe my original point is valid. I've called no one any names, even though I've been baited by several, including you. And I have the utmost respect for pilots with more experience than I.
As far as respect for people with more FORUM experience than I, well sorry, no, that hardly matters.
#40
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 170 babysitter
Posts: 417
I'm hardly shooting my mouth off. I still believe my original point is valid. I've called no one any names, even though I've been baited by several, including you. And I have the utmost respect for pilots with more experience than I.
As far as respect for people with more FORUM experience than I, well sorry, no, that hardly matters.
As far as respect for people with more FORUM experience than I, well sorry, no, that hardly matters.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post