Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Mandatory Age 65 Retirements for Regionals? >

Mandatory Age 65 Retirements for Regionals?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Mandatory Age 65 Retirements for Regionals?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-04-2017, 07:53 AM
  #11  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,090
Default

Originally Posted by Flyjustin
lets hope not.... I wouldnt even understand the turkey that wants to work until 67......

Several people who I know would, these are age 64 1/2 people. And honestly they seem fine, none of the FO's complain about them.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 05-04-2017, 08:46 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 840
Default

Originally Posted by Flyjustin
lets hope not.... I wouldnt even understand the turkey that wants to work until 67......
Until you become that turkey! It's kinda like the guys who were against the age 60 rule changing until they got there themselves.
CaptYoda is offline  
Old 05-04-2017, 09:59 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: 145
Posts: 219
Default

There's going to be several each year at Trans States. It's nowhere near the attrition that we are getting of people moving on to majors and LCCs, and all signs are pointing to that increasing.

But lord help us if age 67 happens. We know how that will go. A few will medical out, a few will just be ready, but a majority (at least at the majors) will be there for two more years. All the regional pilots need is more stagnation at the majors
Celeste is offline  
Old 05-04-2017, 05:35 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 274
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
I suspect it will become 67 before too long, at least for domestic ops. Japan already did it.
Any idea on some kind of time frame for 67? Year or two maybe?
New Guy 007 is offline  
Old 05-04-2017, 10:17 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: 145
Posts: 219
Default

Originally Posted by New Guy 007
Any idea on some kind of time frame for 67? Year or two maybe?

As soon as the American people and Congress give enough $h*ts to do something about it.... and what's the quickest bandaid fix??? Age 67. (Closely followed by repeal of the 1500 hour rule )

When cold this happen? Six months? 6 years? I'd place money on this happening before the major's retirements go into full swing.
Celeste is offline  
Old 05-04-2017, 10:24 PM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 79
Default

Originally Posted by Flyjustin
lets hope not.... I wouldnt even understand the turkey that wants to work until 67......
That's because your young is my guess. Your ideas will change with age. Some of use enjoy flying as much as golf or fishing.
aa010175 is offline  
Old 05-05-2017, 06:10 AM
  #17  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,090
Default

Originally Posted by New Guy 007
Any idea on some kind of time frame for 67? Year or two maybe?

I think a little longer, perhaps five years.

The FAA will almost certainly not make a change with safety ramifications unilaterally, they'll have to be told by congress (if age 65 is law, as opposed to just a reg, then only congress can change it anyway which I think is the case).

But once the pressure's on, age 67 will be a LOT more politically palatable than going up against the colgan families to roll back the ATP law. Better to let the older guys fly a little longer, than let inexperienced young punks get their OJT with 70 pax in the back.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 05-05-2017, 07:09 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Posts: 273
Default

I don't think legacy carriers will have a shortage. And an extra two years really won't do anything. Only a small percentage of guys would work past 65 anyway. Regionals will have to continue to add pay and benefits to attract pilots in the next 5 yrs.

1500 hour rule is viewed as a safety thing and was made after Colgan so good luck getting that reversed. 1500 rule has helped to increase pay, it's a good thing.
BeechPilot33 is offline  
Old 05-05-2017, 09:03 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: 145
Posts: 219
Default

Originally Posted by BeechPilot33
I don't think legacy carriers will have a shortage. And an extra two years really won't do anything. Only a small percentage of guys would work past 65 anyway. Regionals will have to continue to add pay and benefits to attract pilots in the next 5 yrs.

1500 hour rule is viewed as a safety thing and was made after Colgan so good luck getting that reversed. 1500 rule has helped to increase pay, it's a good thing.
I'm not saying there's a shortage at the majors, or that there will ever be a true shortage. However, 50% of legacy flights are on regionals, and the shortage is definitely hitting there. The majority of the flying public doesn't really understand what it means to be flying American Eagle vs AA, or United Express vs United. When flights start to really cancel due to lack of crew and routes from small- medium airports go away, that's when the American public and media will push Congress to do something. Age 67 is an easy, but very temporary fix. There would be enough geezers staying at the legacies, that between military hires and the lull in retirements, the majors would not have hire very many regional pilots. It would give them two years where regional pilots would be stuck in place, thus protecting their feed for a while.
Celeste is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aapilotguy
Hangar Talk
20
05-31-2017 08:02 AM
FailOperational
Major
33
11-08-2012 09:23 PM
eFDeeeX
Cargo
59
01-31-2008 01:30 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices