Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
SKW CEO warns pilot shortage could lead... >

SKW CEO warns pilot shortage could lead...

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

SKW CEO warns pilot shortage could lead...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-2017, 08:16 AM
  #151  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 92
Default

Originally Posted by sweetholyjesus
From your post history, looks like you're at Envoy. Their highest FO rate is $43/hr. Your guarantee is only 72 hrs for lineholders. So, your guaranteed salary is only $37,000.

Now if you add your bonuses (which run out after year 3), you will make $59000 year 1, $49000 year 2, and $49000 year 3. After year 3 you are back down to $37,000 unless you are fortunate enough to upgrade (and how close was American to closing Envoy when they voted no?).

If you aren't finished paying off that loan by then, things could start getting tight, I imagine. Most people can't pay a $70,000 loan in 3 years....Do you understand now why I'm saying that the bonuses aren't guaranteed/salary? And that's even with the assumption that the company will actually pay it.
I absolutely would prefer the retention bonuses get rolled in to pay raises. And if airlines start taking away retention bonuses (Envoy, Endeavor, etc.) prior to upgrades, yep -- that'll be a problem. I'm no fortune teller, but if they do pull them away, I think management would see FOs start to trickle out. Only time will tell.

But I think your approx numbers prove my point -- clearing 60k as an FO, disregarding any BS "sign on" bonuses -- is absolutely possible -- and I do it myself. You can 1) bid for credit lines WELL above 72 hours; 2) bid 72 hours with more days off and pick up OT when it goes to critical coverage; 3) save your per diem as a personal choice to boost your take home pay a bit. I really don't feel like I work myself to death, at all, to get to that number either. It was my target amount going into this game, and without much effort I make that amount happen.

That said, I don't disagree -- if Envoy, or anyone else, starts yanking continued-payout "bonuses," the math doesn't work as well for getting to 60k. That'll be a discussion to have in a few years, assuming they aren't negotiated into pay raises by then...
271c is offline  
Old 03-10-2017, 08:21 AM
  #152  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 92
Default

Originally Posted by DirkDiggler
Sorry for the reposts, but this is too important to get buried in pages of chatter.

We have to beat them at their own game. Crying on the forum only goes so far. Time to take action. Main feedback email: [email protected] and the general email is [email protected]
Email sent.
271c is offline  
Old 03-10-2017, 08:21 AM
  #153  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2016
Posts: 443
Default

Originally Posted by 271c
I absolutely would prefer the retention bonuses get rolled in to pay raises. And if airlines start taking away retention bonuses (Envoy, Endeavor, etc.) prior to upgrades, yep -- that'll be a problem. I'm no fortune teller, but if they do pull them away, I think management would see FOs start to trickle out. Only time will tell.

But I think your approx numbers prove my point -- clearing 60k as an FO, disregarding any BS "sign on" bonuses -- is absolutely possible -- and I do it myself. You can 1) bid for credit lines WELL above 72 hours; 2) bid 72 hours with more days off and pick up OT when it goes to critical coverage; 3) save your per diem as a personal choice to boost your take home pay a bit. I really don't feel like I work myself to death, at all, to get to that number either. It was my target amount going into this game, and without much effort I make that amount happen.

That said, I don't disagree -- if Envoy, or anyone else, starts yanking continued-payout "bonuses," the math doesn't work as well for getting to 60k. That'll be a discussion to have in a few years, assuming they aren't negotiated into pay raises by then...
Until it's locked into an hourly rate via contract, you would be foolish to assume these bonuses will not go away.
RemoveB4Flight is offline  
Old 03-10-2017, 08:23 AM
  #154  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 92
Default

Originally Posted by RemoveB4Flight
Until it's locked into an hourly rate via contract, you would be foolish to assume these bonuses will not go away.
Not assuming that. If they go away, I'll have a decision to make. A budget to re-adjust, as anyone would if their income went down 10k without a captain upgrade in sight.

The airline could disappear.

9/11 could happen again.

I could lose my medical (and have before!).

I'm ready for any and all possibilities, to include an end to the bonus.
271c is offline  
Old 03-10-2017, 08:27 AM
  #155  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 857
Default

Originally Posted by 271c
I absolutely would prefer the retention bonuses get rolled in to pay raises. And if airlines start taking away retention bonuses (Envoy, Endeavor, etc.) prior to upgrades, yep -- that'll be a problem. I'm no fortune teller, but if they do pull them away, I think management would see FOs start to trickle out. Only time will tell.

But I think your approx numbers prove my point -- clearing 60k as an FO, disregarding any BS "sign on" bonuses -- is absolutely possible -- and I do it myself. You can 1) bid for credit lines WELL above 72 hours; 2) bid 72 hours with more days off and pick up OT when it goes to critical coverage; 3) save your per diem as a personal choice to boost your take home pay a bit. I really don't feel like I work myself to death, at all, to get to that number either. It was my target amount going into this game, and without much effort I make that amount happen.

That said, I don't disagree -- if Envoy, or anyone else, starts yanking continued-payout "bonuses," the math doesn't work as well for getting to 60k. That'll be a discussion to have in a few years, assuming they aren't negotiated into pay raises by then...
This post doesn't make any sense. I actually included the bonuses into those calculations, so without them the pay is all the way down to $33000 year 1, and $37000 thereafter.
(I did have to go back and lower the numbers a bit since you guys don't actually make $43/hr first year, you make closer to $38/hr.)

Again, per diem is not compensation, whether you choose to "save it" or not. And you shouldn't have to work overtime to make a salary that's appropriate for the work you do. Also, you are never guaranteed to be able to credit more than min guarantee each month. Ask the AWAC captains about that...
sweetholyjesus is offline  
Old 03-10-2017, 08:40 AM
  #156  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 92
Default

Originally Posted by sweetholyjesus
This post doesn't make any sense. I actually included the bonuses into those calculations, so without them the pay is all the way down to $33000 year 1, and $37000 thereafter. (I did, however, have to go back and lower the numbers a bit since you guys don't actually make $43/hr first year, you make closer to $38/hr.)

Again, per diem is not compensation, whether you choose to "save it" or not. And you shouldn't have to work overtime to make a salary that's appropriate for the work you do. Also, you are never guaranteed to be able to credit more than min guarantee each month. Ask the AWAC captains about that...
I know you included the bonuses. My point was that even if you disregard the sign-on bonus that you included in first-year pay (because that has been... a moving target) and only include line values, retention bonuses (which most FOs on property are getting, though recent guys aren't getting them till after year 1), per diem, and an occasional OT trip, 60k is VERY do-able. You say that nothing is guaranteed -- when did I say an FO is guaranteed 60k? I said it is possible. And that I attain that number, along with several of my friends. Line values might go back to minimum. OT might disappear -- and yes, it'd be great if I didn't have to pick up any OT. But I do it when I want to, here and there, to make sure I clear the 60k hurdle.

That said -- we can disregard per diem for the sake of argument. In that case, clearing 55k as an FO is extremely easy. And in that case, your meals on the road are covered by per diem :-)

And again, there are MANY contractual improvements needed. I promise -- I'm a normal guy who wants a better life for all of us. And yes, more money too...
271c is offline  
Old 03-10-2017, 08:45 AM
  #157  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 857
Default

Originally Posted by 271c
when did I say an FO is guaranteed 60k? I said it is possible. And that I attain that number, along with several of my friends. Line values might go back to minimum. OT might disappear -- and yes, it'd be great if I didn't have to pick up any OT. But I do it when I want to, here and there, to make sure I clear the 60k hurdle.
When did I say that you said 60k as an FO is guaranteed???

I think the mistake you are making is calling these variables "salary". A bonus is not part of your salary, by definition. Per-diem is definitely not part of your "salary", but you keep calling it that. Nothing besides your SALARY is guaranteed to fill your wallet.
sweetholyjesus is offline  
Old 03-10-2017, 08:54 AM
  #158  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 591
Default

Ever buy a house before? They call your employer to verify your income. You know what number they are going to give?

(hourly rate) x (monthly guarantee) x 12

That is your annual salary. Bonuses and perdiem and overtime are not included. End of story.
squib is offline  
Old 03-10-2017, 09:13 AM
  #159  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 175
Default

Per-diem is given to us because food and other services aren't as cheap on the road. It's that simple, it's a reimbursement for people in the travel industry that don't have the luxury to have a car every day to shop at the most competitive grocery store. We're stuck at airports and hotels. You are limited to what you can buy.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Tring is offline  
Old 03-10-2017, 09:16 AM
  #160  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Posts: 857
Default

Originally Posted by Tring
Per-diem is given to us because food and other services aren't as cheap on the road. It's that simple, it's a reimbursement for people in the travel industry that don't have the luxury to have a car every day to shop at the most competitive grocery store. We're stuck at airports and hotels. You are limited to what you can buy.
That is correct, from a legal standpoint. You can't argue that it's salary just because you will pocket it and pack tuna sandwiches to eat instead. Other professionals aren't bothered with that type of thing when they are on the road.
sweetholyjesus is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fly4hire
Major
128
01-26-2009 05:28 PM
shackone
Mergers and Acquisitions
151
02-26-2008 06:35 PM
vagabond
Major
2
04-16-2007 07:00 AM
RockBottom
Major
0
03-27-2005 07:09 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
03-07-2005 10:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices