PSA or TSA
12-16-2014, 08:56 AM
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Position: CL65
Posts: 955
Aren't they all bottom feeders? Every one of them has negative qualities that can be pointed out easily.
Pick the one that has what is important to you. Commuting to work, especially on reserve, can cost thousands of dollars a year. For me, I chose somewhere that I could live in base. That alone makes up for another one paying a few more nickels an hour in pay.
QoL, schedule, work rules, and domicile/commuting all mean much more to me than the differences in pay. If the differences in pay were substantial, it would be different, but they aren't.
Pick the one that has what is important to you. Commuting to work, especially on reserve, can cost thousands of dollars a year. For me, I chose somewhere that I could live in base. That alone makes up for another one paying a few more nickels an hour in pay.
QoL, schedule, work rules, and domicile/commuting all mean much more to me than the differences in pay. If the differences in pay were substantial, it would be different, but they aren't.
12-16-2014, 09:25 AM
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Left
Posts: 1,809
What a useful, thought-out, intelligent, helpful addition....
Do you have specific reasons, with sources to site?
Do you have an alternate suggestion for him? With specific, factual reasons why your suggestion might be better?
Have you worked at either one? Perhaps you could share your first hand experiences.
Do you have any idea, at all, what you are talking about?
Do you have specific reasons, with sources to site?
Do you have an alternate suggestion for him? With specific, factual reasons why your suggestion might be better?
Have you worked at either one? Perhaps you could share your first hand experiences.
Do you have any idea, at all, what you are talking about?
12-16-2014, 09:33 AM
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 593
Last time I checked Holdings hadn't decided which subsidiary those MRJ's or EJet V2's were going too, if they even get them. Ide hate for someone to make career decision on something that may never come to fruition....
12-16-2014, 09:44 AM
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
12-16-2014, 10:51 AM
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: CRJ
Posts: 358
Quote:
Originally Posted by djrogs03
Last time I checked Holdings hadn't decided which subsidiary those MRJ's or EJet V2's were going too, if they even get them. Ide hate for someone to make career decision on something that may never come to fruition....
Trans States get the first 10 MRJs.
Originally Posted by djrogs03
Last time I checked Holdings hadn't decided which subsidiary those MRJ's or EJet V2's were going too, if they even get them. Ide hate for someone to make career decision on something that may never come to fruition....
Trans States get the first 10 MRJs.
12-16-2014, 10:54 AM
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,011
It takes time and money to get a new airplane added to your certificate. It's not like scalping baseball tickets out on the corner of Carnegie and Ontario. I'm sure some thought went into acquiring these airplanes.
12-16-2014, 12:00 PM
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
Not what we've heard lately. Company reps have been back and forth to Japan since the rollout. Planes are definetely coming to TSA, they have a way to solve the weight issue, and they are hoping to beat the current deliversy schedule by six months.
12-16-2014, 12:48 PM
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Seat 0B
Posts: 2,300
Nope. They are all subcontractors, but not all bottom feeders. A bottom feeder outfit will keep lowering the bar until it's so low you can step right over it. Undercut after undercut, to get new shiny jets and the ones who hold the line & refuse to take concessions get the short end of the stick. Look at the big picture boys.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
